A scalar analysis of landscape connectivity

Oikos

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 433-439

  Brooks, C P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; CONNECTIVITY; HABITAT STRUCTURE; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0041911289     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0579.2003.11511.x     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Andreassen, H. P., Halle, S. and Ims, R. A. 1996a. Optimal design of movement corridors in root voles - not too wide and not too narrow. - J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 63-70.
2. Andreassen, H. P., Ims, R. A. and Steinset, O. K. 1996b. Discontinuous habitat corridors: the effects on male root vole movements. - J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 555-560.
3. Andreassen, H. P., Hetrzberg, K. and Ims, R. A. 1998. Space use responses to habitat fragmentation and connectivity in the root vole Microtus oeconomus. - Ecology 79: 123-135.
4. Andrén, H. 1994. Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. - Oikos 71: 355-366.
5. Belichon, S., Clobert, J. and Massot, M. 1996. What differences in fitness components between philopatric and dispersing individuals? - Acta Oecol. 16: 503-517.
6. Boulinier, T. 1996. On breeding performance, colony growth and habitat selection in buffnecked ibis (Theristicus caudatus). - Condor 98: 440-441.
7. Boulinier, T. and Lemel, J.-Y. 1996. Spatial and temporal variations of factors affecting breeding habitat quality in colonial birds: some consequences for dispersal and habitat selection. - Acta Oecol. 17: 531-552.
8. Bunn, A. G., Urban, D. L. and Keitt, T. H. 2000. Landscape connectivity: a conservation application of graph theory. - J. Environ. Manage. 59: 265-278.
9. Burger, J. 1982. The role of reproductive success in colony-site selection and abandonment in black skimmers (Rynchops niger). - Auk 99: 109-115.
10. Chung, M. Y. and Chung, M. G. 1999a. Notes on spatial genetic structure in populations of Cymbidium goeringii (Orchidaceae). - Ann. Bot. Fenn. 36: 161-164.
11. Chung, M. G. and Chung, M. Y. 1999b. Spatial genetic structure of clonal and sexual reproduction in a population of Abeliophyllum distichum (Oleaceae), an endangered monotypic genus. - Genes Genet. 74: 9-14.
12. Chung, M. G. and Park, C. W. 2000. Notes on spatial genetic structure in a hybrid population between Aconitum japonicum ssp. napiforme and A. jaluense (Ranunculaceae). - Ann. Bot. Fenn. 37: 243-247.
13. Chung, M. G., Chung, J. M., Chung, M. Y. and Epperson, B. K. 2000. Spatial distribution of allozyme polymorphisms following clonal and sexual reproduction in populations of Rhus javanica (Anacardiaceae). - Heredity 84: 178-185.
14. Conroy, M. J., Cohen, Y., James, F. C. et al. 1995. Parameter estimation, reliability, and model improvement for spatially explicit models of animal populations. - Ecol. Appl. 5: 3-11.
15. deVries, H. H., den Boer, P. J. and van Dijk, Th. S. 1996. Ground beetle species in heathland fragments in relation to survival, dispersal, and habitat preference. - Oecologia 107: 332-342.
16. Davidson, C. 1998. Issues in measuring landscape fragmentation. - Wildlife Soc. Bull. 26: 32-37.
17. Demaynadier, P. G. and Hunter, M. L. 1998. Effects of silvicultural edges on the distribution and abundance of amphibians in Maine. - Conserv. Biol. 12: 340-352.
18. Doak, D. F., Marino, P. C. and Karieva, P. M. 1992. Spatial scale mediates the influence of habitat fragmentation on dispersal success: implications for conservation. - Theor. Popul. Biol. 41: 315-336.
19. Fahrig, L. and Paloheimo, J. 1988. Determinants of local population size in patchy habitats. - Theor. Popul. Biol. 34: 129-212.
20. Fretwell, S. D. and Lucas, H. J. 1970. On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. - Acta Biotheor. 19: 16-36.
21. Gardner, R. H. and O'Neill, R. V. 1991. Pattern, process and predictability: the use of neutral models for landscape analysis. - In: Turner, M. G. and Gardner, R. H. (eds), Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. Springer-Verlag, pp. 289-307.
22. Gardner, R. H., Milne, B. T., Turner, M. G. and O'Neill, R. V. 1987. Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. - Landscape Ecol. 1: 19-28.
23. Gibbs, J. P. 1998a. Distribution of woodland amphibians along a forest fragmentation gradient. - Landscape Ecol. 13: 263-268.
24. Gibbs, J. P. 1998b. Amphibian movements in response to forest edges, roads, and streambeds in southern New England. - J. Wildlife Manage. 62: 584-589.
25. Giles, B. E. and Goudet, J. 1997. A case study of genetic structure in a plant metapopulation. - In: Gilpin, M. and Hanski, I. (eds), Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics and evolution. Academic Press, pp. 429-454.
26. Golden, D. M. and Crist, T. O. 2000. Experimental effects of habitat fragmentation on rove beetles and ants: patch area or edge. - Oikos 90: 525-538.
27. Gross, J. and Yellen, J. 1999. Graph theory and its applications. - CRC Press.
28. Haddad, N. M. 1999a. Corridor and distance effects on inter-patch movements: a landscape experiment with butterflies. - Ecol. Appl. 9: 612-622.
29. Haddad, N. M. 1999b. Corridor use predicted from behaviors at habitat boundaries. - Am. Nat. 153: 215-227.
30. Haddad, N. M. and Baum, K. A. 1999. An experimental test of corridor effects on butterfly densities. - Ecol. Appl. 9: 623-633.
31. Haddad, N. M., Rosenberg, D. K. and Noon, B. R. 2000. On experimentation and the study of corridors: response to Beir and Noss. - Conserv. Biol. 14: 1543-1545.
32. Harary, F. 1969. Graph theory. - Addison Wesley.
33. Heinen, K. and Merriam, G. 1990. The elements of connectivity where corridor quality is variable. - Landscape Ecol. 4: 157-170.
34. Hjermann, D. O. and Ims, R. A. 1996. Landscape ecology of the wart-biter Decticus verrucivorus in a patchy landscape. - J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 768-780.
35. Ims, R. A. and Andreassen, H. P. 1999. Effects of experimental habitat fragmentation and connectivity on root vole demography. - J. Anim. Ecol. 68: 839-852.
36. Jaeger, J. A. G. 2000. Landscape division, splitting index, and effective mesh size: new measures of landscape fragmentation. - Landscape Ecol. 15: 115-130.
37. Johnson, M. L. and Gaines, M. S. 1990. Evolution of dispersal: theoretical models and empirical tests using birds and mammals. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21: 449-480.
38. Keitt, T. H., Urban, D. L. and Milne, B. T. 1997. Detecting critical scales in fragmented landscapes. - Conserv. Ecol. 1http://www.consecol.org/Journal/vol1/iss1/art4/.
39. Korona, R. 1991. Genetic basis of behavioral strategies. Dispersal of female flour beetles, Tribolium confusion, in a laboratory system. - Oikos 62: 265-270.
40. Kuno, E. 1981. Dispersal and persistence of populations in unstable habitats: a theoretical note. - Oecologia 49: 123-126.
41. Legendre, P. and Fortin, M.-J. 1989. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. - Vegetatio 80: 107-138.
42. Lemel, J.-Y., Belichon, S., Clobert, J. and Hochberg, M. E. 1997. The evolution of dispersal in a two-patch system: some consequences of differences between migrants and residents. - Evol. Ecol. 11: 613-629.
43. Lehmkuhl, J. F. and Ruggiero, L. F. 1991. Forest fragmentation in the Pacific Northwest and its potential effects on wildlife. - In: Ruggiero, L. F., Aubry, K. B., Carey, A. B. and Huff, M. H. (eds), Wildlife and vegetation of unmanaged douglas-fir forests. GTR-PNW-285. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, pp. 34-36.
44. Levin, S. A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. - Ecology 73: 1943-1967.
45. Lidicker, W. Z. and Stenseth, N. C. 1992. To disperse or not to disperse: who does it and why? - In: Steneseth, N. C. and Lidicker, W. Z. (eds), Animal dispersal. Chapman & Hall, pp. 21-34.
46. Ludwig, J. A., Wiens, J. A. and Tongway, D. J. 2000. A scaling rule for landscape patches and how it applies to conserving soil resources in savannas. - Ecosystems 3: 84-97.
47. McPeek, M. A. and Holt, R. D. 1992. The evolution of dispersal in spatially and temporally varying environments. - Am. Nat. 140: 1010-1027.
48. Metzger, J.-P. and Decamps, H. 1997. The structural connectivity threshold: an hypothesis in conservation biology at the landscape scale. - Acta Oecologica 18: 1-12.
49. Mizyazaki, Y. and Isagi, Y. 2000. Pollen flow and the intrapopulation genetic structure of Heloniopsis prientalis on the forest floor as determined using microsatellite markers. - Theor. Appl. Genet. 101: 718-723.
50. Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. - Am. Nat. 106: 283-292.
51. Nekola, J. C. and White, P. S. 1999. The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. - J. Biogeogr. 26: 867-878.
52. O'Neill, R. V., Krummel, J. R., Gardner, R. H. et al. 1988. Indices of landscape pattern. - Landscape Ecol. 1: 153-162.
53. Paradis, E. 1998. Interactions between spatial and temporal scales in the evolution of dispersal rate. - Evol. Ecol. 12: 235-244.
54. Saunders, D. A., Hobbs, R. J. and Margules, C. R. 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. - Conserv. Biol. 5: 18-32.
55. Schumaker, N. H. 1996. Using landscape indices to predict habitat connectivity. - Ecology 77: 1210-1225.
56. Sokal, R. R. and Rolf, F. J. 1994. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. - W. H. Freeman & Co.
57. Stamps, J. A., Buechner, M. and Krishnan, V. V. 1987. The effects of edge permeability and habitat geometry on emigration from patches of habitat. - Am. Nat. 129: 533-552.
58. Stauffer, D. and Aharony, A. 1985. Introduction to percolation theory. - Taylor and Francis.
59. Taylor, P. D., Fahrig, L., Henein, K. and Merriam, G. 1993. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. - Oikos 68: 571-573.
60. Tischendorf, L. and Fahrig, L. 2000a. On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. - Oikos 90: 7-19.
61. Tischendorf, L. and Fahrig, L. 2000b. How should we measure landscape connectivity? - Landscape Ecol. 15: 633-641.
62. Travis, J. M. J. and Dytham, C. 1998. The evolution of dispersal in a metapopulation: a spatially explicit, individual-based model. - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265: 17-23.
63. Turner, M. G. 1989. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 171-197.
64. Turner, S. J., O'Neill, R. V., Conley, W. et al. 1991. Pattern and scale: statistics for landscape ecology. - In: Turner, M. G. and Gardner, R. H. (eds), Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. Springer-Verlag, pp. 17-49.
65. Watt, A. S. 1947. Pattern and process in the plant community. - J. Ecol. 35: 1-22.
66. Whitcomb, R. F., Lynch, J. F., Klimkiewwicz, M. K. et al. 1981. Effects of forest fragmentation on avifauna of the eastern deciduous forest. - In: Burgess, R. L. and Sharpe, D. M. (eds), Forest island dynamics in man-dominated landscapes. Springer-Verlag, pp. 125-205.
67. Wiens, J. A. 1997. Metapopulation dynamics and landscape ecology. - In: Gilpin, M. and Hanski, I. (eds), Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics and evolution. Academic Press, pp. 43-62.
68. Wiens, J. A., Schooley, R. L. and Weeks, R. D. 1997. Patchy landscapes and animal movements: do beetles percolate? - Oikos 78: 257-264.
69. With, K. A. 1997. The application of neutral landscape models in conservation biology. - Conserv. Biol. 11: 1069-1080.
70. With, K. A. and Crist, T. O. 1995. Critical thresholds in species' responses to landscape structure. - Ecology 76: 2446-2459.
71. With, K. A. and Crist, T. O. 1996. Translating across scales: simulating species distributions as the aggregate response of individuals to heterogeneity. - Ecol. Modelling. 93: 125-137.
72. With, K. A. and King, A. W. 1997. The use and misuse of neutral landscape models in ecology. - Oikos 79: 219-229.
73. With, K. A. and King, A. W. 1999. Extinction thresholds for species in fractal landscapes. - Conserv. Biol. 13: 314-326.