Simulation of overlapping design activities in concurrent engineering

Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

Volumn 137, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 950-957

  Bogus, S M ^a   Diekmann, J E ^b   Molenaar, K R ^b   Harper, C ^b   Patil, S ^b,c   Lee, J S ^d  

^a MSC01 1070   (United States)

^b University of Colorado at Boulder   (United States)

^c MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Dongguk University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Concurrent engineering; Costs; Design; Scheduling; Simulation

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION MODEL; DELIVERY TIME; HIGHLY SENSITIVE; OVERALL COSTS; OVERLAPPING DESIGN; POTENTIAL RISKS; PROJECT DELIVERY; SIMULATION; SIMULATION MODEL; SIMULATIONS AND MODELING;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; COSTS; DESIGN; ENGINEERING; RISKS; SCHEDULING;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

EID: 83755207712     PISSN: 07339364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000363     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Blacud, N. A., Bogus, S. M., Molenaar, K. R., and Diekmann, J. E. (2009). Construction sensitivity under design uncertainty. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 135 (3), 199-206. 0733-9364 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2009)135:3(199)
2. Bogus, S. M. (2004). Concurrent engineering strategies for reducing design delivery time. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
3. Bogus, S. M., Molenaar, K. R., and Diekmann, J. E. (2005). Concurrent engineering approach to reducing delivery time. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 131 (11), 1179-1185. 0733-9364 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:11(1179) (Pubitemid 41596025)
4. Bogus, S. M., Molenaar, K. R., and Diekmann, J. E. (2006). Strategies for overlapping dependent design activities. Constr. Manage. Econ., 24 (8), 829-837. 0742-597X 10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1994)10:3(46) (Pubitemid 44314572)
5. Eldin, N. N. (1997). Concurrent engineering: A schedule reduction tool. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 123 (3), 354-362. 0733-9364 10.1061/(ASCE)0733- 9364(1997)123:3(354) (Pubitemid 127590577)
6. Jaafari, A. (1997). Concurrent construction and life cycle project management. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 123 (4), 427-436. 0733-9364 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1997)123:4(427) (Pubitemid 127590585)
7. Krishnan, V., Eppinger, S. D., and Whitney, D. E. (1995). Accelerating product development by the exchange of preliminary product design information. J. Mech. Des. 1050-0472, 117 (4), 491-498. 10.1115/1.2826709
8. Krishnan, V., Eppinger, S. D., and Whitney, D. E. (1997). A model-based framework to overlap product development activities. Manage. Sci., 43 (4), 437-451. 0025-1909 10.1287/mnsc.43.4.437 (Pubitemid 127569849)
9. Loch, C., and Terwiesch, C. (1998). Communication and uncertainty in concurrent engineering. Manage. Sci., 44 (8), 1032. 0025-1909 10.1287/mnsc.44.8.1032
10. Onwubiko, C. (2000). Introduction to engineering design optimization, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
11. Pena-Mora, F., and Li, M. (2001). Dynamic planning and control methodology for design/build fast-track construction projects. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 127 (1), 1-17. 0733-9364 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2001)127:1(1) (Pubitemid 32158954)
12. Prasad, B. (1996). Concurrent engineering fundamentals: Integrated product and process organization, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
13. Roemer, T. A., Ahmadi, R., and Wang, R. H. (2000). Time-cost tradeoffs in overlapped product development. Oper. Res., 48 (6), 858-865. 0030-364X 10.1287/opre.48.6.858.12396 (Pubitemid 32189518)