Prioritization of data quality dimensions and skills requirements in genome annotation work

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 195-207

  Huang, Hong ^a   Stvilia, Besiki ^b   Jörgensen, Corinne ^b   Bass, Hank W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTEXT-SENSITIVE; DATA AND INFORMATION; DATA CURATORS; DATA QUALITY; GENOME ANNOTATION; GENOMICS; PRIORITIZATION; SCIENTIFIC DATA; TRAINING COURSE;

CURRICULA; GENES; QUALITY ASSURANCE;

DATA REDUCTION;

EID: 83655201334     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21652     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Bartlett, J.C., &, Toms, E.G., (2005). Developing a protocol for bioinformatics analysis: An integrated information behavior and task analysis approach: Research Articles. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 56 (5), 469-482.
2. Bragge, J., Merisalo-Rantanen, H., &, Hallikainen, P., (2005). Gathering innovative end-user feedback for continuous development of information systems: A repeatable and transferable e-collaboration process. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48 (1), 55-67.
3. Brenner, S., (1999). Errors in genome annotation. Trends in Genetics, 15, 132-133.
4. Burkhardt, K., Schneider, B., &, Ory, J., (2006). A biocurator perspective: Annotation at the Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank. PLoS Computational Biology, 2, e99.
5. Carroll, J.M., (1997). Scenario-based design. In, M. Helander, &, T.K. Landauer, (Eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (2nd ed., pp. 383-406). Amsterdam: North Holland.
6. Chung, W., Fisher, C., &, Wang, R., (2002, November). What skills matter in data quality ? Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Information Quality (ICIQ-02), Boston, MA.
7. Colosimo, M.E., Morgan, A.A., Yeh, A.S., &, Colombe, J.B., (2005). Data preparation and interannotator agreement: BioCreAtIvE. BMC Bioinformatics, 6, S12.
8. Crick, H.F., (1958). One protein synthesis. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, 12, 138-163.
9. Curry, E., Freitas, A., &, O'Riáin, S., (2010). The role of community-driven data curation for enterprises. In, D. Wood, (Ed.), Linking enterprise data (pp. 25-47). New York: Springer.
10. Devos, D., &, Valencia, A., (2001). Intrinsic errors in genome annotation. Trends in Genetics, 17, 429-431.
11. Diaper, D., (2004). Understanding task analysis in human computer interaction. In, D. Diaper, &, N. Stanton, (Eds.), The handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction (pp. 117-133). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Emmersen, J., Rudd, S., Mewes, H., &, Tetko, I., (2007). Separation of sequences from host-pathogen interface using triplet nucleotide frequencies. Fungal Genetics and Biology, 44 (4), 231-241.
13. Evans, J.R., &, Lindsay, W.M., (2005). The management and control of quality (6th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western, Thomson Learning.
14. Frické, M., &, Fallis, D., (2004). Indicators of accuracy for answers to ready reference questions on the internet. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55 (3), 238-245.
15. Frohlich, H., Speer, N., Poustka, A., &, Beissbarth, T., (2007). GOSim-an R-package for computation of information theoretic GO similarities between terms and gene products. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 166.
16. Ge, M., &, Helfert, M., (2007, November). A review of information quality research-develop a research agenda. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Quality 2007, Cambridge, MA.
17. Go, K., &, Carroll, J., (2004). Scenario-based task analysis. In, D. Diaper, &, N. Stanton, (Eds.), The handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction (pp. 117-133). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Hair, J., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R., &, Tatham, R., (2005). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19. Hermann, D., (2007). Are you a good data steward ? Healthcare Purchasing News, 31 (1), 58.
20. Hsiang, T., &, Goodwin, P., (2003). Distinguishing plant and fungal sequences in ESTs from infected plant tissues. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 54, 339-351.
21. Huss, J., Orozco, C., Goodale, J., Wu, C., Batalov, S., Vickers, T.,, Su, A., (2008). A gene wiki for community annotation of gene function. PLoS Biology, 6 (7), e175.
22. Jones, C., Brown, A., &, Baumann, U., (2007). Estimating the annotation error rate of curated GO database sequence annotations. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 170-174.
23. Kim, C., &, Falkow, S., (2003). Significance analysis of lexical bias in microarray data. BMC Bioinformatics, 4, 12-15.
24. Kolesov, G., Mewes, H., &, Frishman, D., (2001). SNAPping up functionally related genes based on context information: A colinearity-free approach. Journal of Molecular Biology, 311, 639-656.
25. Kunin, V., Copeland, A., Lapidus, A., Mavromatis, K., &, Hugenholtz, P., (2008). A bioinformatician's guide to metagenomics. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 72 (4), 557-578.
26. Lankes, D.R., (2008). Credibility on the internet: Shifting from authority to reliability. Journal of Documentation, 64 (5), 667-686.
27. Lee, Y., Pipino, L., Funk, J., &, Wang, R., (2006). Journey to data quality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Lee, Y., &, Strong, D., (2003). Knowing-why about data processes and data quality. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20 (3), 13-39.
29. Leontiev, A., (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30. Lord, P., &, Macdonald, A., (2003). E-Science curation report: Data curation for e-Science in the UK: An audit to establish requirements for future curation and provision. Bristol, UK: The JISC Committee for the Support of Research. Retrieved from
31. MacMullen, W.J., (2006). Contextual analysis of variation and quality in human-curated gene ontology annotations (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
32. Marco, D., (2006). Understanding data governance and stewardship, Part 2. DM Review, 16 (10), 17.
33. McGilvray, D., (2008). Executing data quality projects: Ten steps to quality data and trusted information. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
34. McGuire, A., Diaz, C., Wang, T., &, Hilsenbeck, S., (2009). Social networkers' attitudes towards direct-to-consumer personal genome testing. American Journal of Bioethics, 9 (6-7), 3-10.
35. McNeil, L.K., Reich, C., Aziz, R.K., Bartels, D., Cohoon, M., Disz, T.,, Stevens, R., (2007). The national microbial pathogen database resource (NMPDR): A genomics platform based on subsystem annotation. Nucleic Acids Research, 35 (suppl 1): D347-D353. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkl947
36. Mikkelsen, T., Galagan, J., &, Mesirov, J., (2005). Improving genome annotations using phylogenetic profile anomaly detection. Bioinformatics, 21 (4), 464-470.
37. Mons, B., Ashburner, M., Chichester, C., van Mulligen, E., Weeber, M., den Dunnen, J.,, Bairoch, A., (2008). Calling on a million minds for community annotation in WikiProteins. Genome Biology, 9, R89.
38. Müller, F., &, Freytag, J., (2003). Data quality in genome databases. In Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Information Quality (ICIQ03). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Nardi, B., (1996). Activity theory and human-computer interaction. In, B.A. Nardi, (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 69-103). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Ouyang, S., Zhu, W., Hamilton, J., Lin, H., Campbell, M., Childs, K.,, Buell, C., (2007). The TIGR Rice Genome Annotation Resource: Improvements and new features. Nucleic Acids Research, 35, D883-D887.
41. Pruitt, K., Tatusova, T., &, Maglott, D., (2007). NCBI reference sequences (RefSeq): A curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins. Nucleic Acids Research, 35, D61-65.
42. Reed, J., Famili, I., Thiele, I., &, Palsson, B., (2006). Towards multidimensional genome annotation. Nature Reviews Genetics, 7 (2), 130-141.
43. Rieh, S., (2002). Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (2), 145-161.
44. Salzberg, S., (2007). Genome re-annotation: A wiki solution ? Genome Biology, 8, 102-102.
45. Samuel, V., Gussman, A., &, Klumke, W., (2008). Toward an online repository of standard operating procedures (SOPs) for (meta)genomic annotation. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, 12 (2), 137-141.
46. Schlueter, S.D., Wilkerson, M.D., Huala, E., Rhee, S.Y., &, Brendel, V., (2005). Community-based gene structure annotation. Trends in Plant Science, 10 (1), 9-14.
47. Shindyalov, I., &, Bourne, P., (1998). Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. Protein Engineering, 11 (9), 739-747.
48. Stein, L., (2001). Genome annotation: From sequence to biology. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2, 493-503.
49. Stevens, R., Gobe, C., Baker, P., &, Brass, A., (2001). A classification of tasks in bioinformatics. Bioinformatics, 17, 180-188.
50. Strong, D., Lee, Y., &, Wang, R., (1997). Data quality in context. Communication of the ACM, 40 (5), 103-110.
51. Stvilia, B., (2006). Measuring information quality (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana.
52. Stvilia, B., &, Gasser, L., (2008). An activity theoretic model for information quality change. First Monday, 13 (4).
53. Stvilia, B., Gasser, L., Twidale, M., &, Smith, L., (2007). A framework for information quality assessment. Journal of American Society of Information Science and Technology, 58 (12), 1720-1733.
54. Stvilia, B., Mon, L., &, Yi, Y., (2009). A model for online consumer health information quality. Journal of American Society of Information Science and Technology, 60 (9), 1781-1791.
55. Stvilia, B., Twidale, M., Smith, L.C., &, Gasser, L., (2008). Information quality work organization in Wikipedia. Journal of American Society of Information Science and Technology, 59 (6), 983-1001.
56. Vygotsky, L., (1981). The development of higher forms of attention in childhood. In, J.V. Wertsch, (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
57. Wand, Y., &, Wang, R., (1996). Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations. Communications of the ACM, 39 (11), 86-92.
58. Wang, R., Pierce, E., Madnick, S., &, Zwass, V., (2005). Information quality (Advances in management information systems). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
59. Wang, R., &, Strong, D., (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12 (4), 5-35.