A Critical Review of Official Public Apologies: Aims, Pitfalls, and a Staircase Model of Effectiveness

Social Issues and Policy Review

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 70-100

  Wohl, Michael J A ^a   Hornsey, Matthew J ^b   Philpot, Catherine R ^b  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 83655197857     PISSN: 17512395     EISSN: 17512409     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-2409.2011.01026.x     Document Type: Review

References (105)

1. Adorno, Th. W. (1975). Schuld und Abwehr: Eine qualitative Analyse zum Gruppenexperiment. In Th.W. Adorno (Ed.), Gesammelte Schriften (Vol. 9.2, pp. 121-324). Frankfurt Suhrkamp.
2. Adorno, Th. W. (1999). What is meant by the working through the past? In H. W. Pickford (Trans.) Critical models: Interventions and catchwords (pp. 89-104). New York Columbia University Press. (Reprinted from Eingriffe. Neun kritische Modelle, by T. W. Adorno, 1963, Frankfurt Suhrkamp)
3. Augoustinos, M. & Le Couteur, A. J. (2004). On whether to apologize to indigenous Australians: The denial of white guilt. In N. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 236-261). New York Cambridge University Press.
4. Auerbach, Y. (2005). Forgiveness and reconciliation: The religious dimension. Terrorism and Political Violence, 17, 469-485.
5. Barkan, E. (2000). The guilt of nations: Restitution and negotiating historical injustices. New York W. W. Norton.
6. Bar-Tal, D., & Bennink, G. H. (2004). The nature of reconciliation as an outcome and as a process. In Y. Bar-Siman-Tov (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 11-38). New York, NY Oxford University Press.
7. Barkan, E., & Karn, A. (2006). Group apology as an ethical imperative. In E. Barkan & A. Karn (Eds.), Taking wrongs seriously: Apologies and reconciliation (pp. 3-32). Palo Alto, CA Stanford University Press.
8. Bergmann, W., & Erb, R. (1991). Antisemitismus in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Ergebnisse der empirischen Forschung 1946-1989. Opladen Leske & Budrich.
9. Blatz, C. W., & Philpot, C. (2010). On the outcomes of intergroup apologies: A review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 995-1007.
10. Blatz, C. W., Schumann, K., & Ross, M. (2009) Government apologies for historical injustices. Political Psychology, 30, 219-241.
11. Bottom, W. P., Gibson, K., Daniels, S., & Murnighan, J. K. (2002). When talk is not cheap: Substantive penance and expressions of intent in the reestablishment of cooperation. Organizational Science, 13, 497-513.
12. Branscombe, N. R. (2004). A social psychological process perspective on collective guilt. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 320-334). New York Cambridge University Press.
13. Branscombe, N. R., & Cronin, T. (2010). Confronting the past to create a better future: The antecedents and benefits of intergroup forgiveness. In A. Azzi, X. Chryssochoou, B. Klandermans, & B. Simon (Eds.), Identity and participation in culturally diverse societies (pp. 338-358). New York Wiley-Blackwell.
14. Branscombe, N. R., Doosje, B., & McGarty, C. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of collective guilt. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 49-66). Philadelphia Psychology Press.
15. Brooks, R. L. (Ed.). (1999). When sorry isn't enough: The controversy over apologies and reparations for human injustice. New York New York University Press.
16. Brown, R. P. & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
17. Brown, R. P., Wohl, M. J. A., & Exline, J. J. (2008). Taking up offenses: Secondhand forgiveness and group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1406-1419.
18. Chapman, A. R. (2007). Truth commissions and intergroup forgiveness: The case of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 13, 51-69.
19. Corntassel, J. & Holder, C. (2008). Who's sorry now? Government apologies, truth commissions, and indigenous self-determination in Australia, Canada, Guatemala, and Peru. Human Rights Review, 9, 465-489.
20. Couch, L. L., Jones, W. H., & Moore, D. S. (1999). Buffering the effects of betrayal: The role of apology, forgiveness, and commitment. In J. M. Adams & H. Warren (Eds.). Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability. Perspecitves on individual differences (pp. 451-469). Dordrecht, Netherlands Kluwer Academic Publishers.
21. Cunningham, M. (1999). Saying sorry: The politics of apology. Political Quarterly, 70, 285-293.
22. Darby, B. W., & Schlenker, B. R. (1982). Children's reactions to apologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 742-753.
23. De Grieff, P. (2008). The role of apologies in national reconciliation processes: On making trustworthy institutions trusted. In M. Gibney, R. E. Howard-Hasmann, J.-M. Coicaud, & N. Steiner (Eds.), The age of apology: Facing up to the past. (pp. 120-134). Philadelphia University of Pennsylvania Press.
24. Digeser, P. E. (2001). Political forgiveness. London Cornell University Press.
25. Exline, J. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000) Expressing forgiveness and repentance: Benefits and barriers. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 133-155). New York, NY Guilford Press.
26. Exline, J. J., Baumeister, R. F., Bushman, B. J., Campbell, W. K. & Finkel, E. J.(2004). Too proud to let go: Narcissistic entitlement as a barrier to forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 894-912.
27. Frantz, C. M., & Bennigson, C. (2005). Better late than early: The influence of timing on apology effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 201-207.
28. Firth R. (1929). Primitive economics of the New Zealand Maori. Florence, KY Taylor & Francis/Routledge.
29. Gibson, J. (2004). Does truth lead to reconciliation? Testing the causal assumptions of the South African truth and reconciliation process. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 201-217.
30. Gilbert, P. (2003). Evolution, social roles, and the difference in shame and guilt. Social Research, 70, 1205-1230.
31. Giner-Sorolla, R., Castano, E., Espinosa, P., & Brown, R. (2008) Shame expressions reduce the recipient's insult from outgroup reparations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 519-526.
32. Goboda-Madikizela, P. (2002). Remorse, forgiveness and rehumanization: Stories from South Africa. The Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 42, 7-32.
33. Gobodo-Madikizela, P. (2008). Transforming trauma in the aftermath of gross human rights abuses: Making public spaces intimate through the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. In A. Nadler, T. E. Malloy, & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 77-96). New York Oxford University Press.
34. Gold, G. J., & Weiner, B. (2000). Remorse, confession, group identity, and expectancies about repeating a transgression. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 291-300.
35. Gonzales, M. H. (1992). A thousand pardons: The effectiveness of verbal remedial tactics during account episodes. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 11, 133-151.
36. Govier, T. & Verwoerd, W. (2002). The promise and pitfalls of apology. Journal of Social Philosophy, 33, 67-82.
37. Habermas, J. (1988). Concerning the public use of memory. New German Critique, 44, 40-50.
38. Harper, S. (2008). Indian Residential Schools Statement of Apology. Retrieved February 3, 2011 from .
39. Harth, N., Hornsey, M. J., & Barlow, F. (2011). Emotional responses to rejection of gestures of intergroup reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 815-829.
40. Hastie, B. (2009). 'Excusing the inexcusable': Justifying injustice in Nelson's sorry speech. Discourse & Society, 20, 705-725.
41. Hodgins, H. S., & Liebeskind, E. (2003). Apology versus defense: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 297-316.
42. Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., Voci, A., McLernon, F., Niens, U., & Noor, M. (2004). Intergroup forgiveness and guilt in Northern Ireland: Social psychological dimensions of "The Troubles". In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doojse (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 193-215). Cambridge Cambridge University Press.
43. Imhoff, R., Wohl, M. J. A., & Erb, H. P. (2011). Just a matter of history? Collective narcissist and the need for historical closure on the past attenuates collective guilt. Manuscript submitted for publication.
44. Insko, C. A., Hoyle, R. H., Pinkley, R. L., Hong, G., Slim, R., Dalton, G., et al (1988). Individual-group discontinuity: The role of a consensus rule. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 505-519.
45. Insko, C. A., Schopler, J., Gaertner, L., Wildschut, T., Kozar, R., Pinter, B., et al (2001). Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity reduction through anticipation of future interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 95-111.
46. Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965) From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in social psychology. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219-266), New York Academic Press.
47. Katz, R., Kegeles, S., Kressin, N., Green, L., James, S., Wang, M. Q., et al (2008). Awareness of the Tuskegee Syphilis study and the US presidential apology and their influence on minority participation in biomedical research. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 1137-1144.
48. Kelman, H. C. (2008). Reconciliation from a social-psychological perspective. In A. Nadler, T. E. Malloy, & J. D. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 15-32). New York Oxford University Press.
49. Kellerman, B. (2006) When should a leader apologize and when not? Harvard Business Review, 84, 72-81.
50. Kim, P. H., Ferrin, D. L., Cooper, C. D., & Dirks, K. T. (2004). Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 104-118.
51. Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity. A. Lingus (Trans). Pittsburgh Duquesne University Press.
52. Lazare, A. (2004). On apology. Oxford, UK Oxford University Press.
53. Leyens, J. P., Paladino, P. M., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez-Perez, A., et al (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Osychology Review, 4, 186-197.
54. Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602-616.
55. McCullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiveness in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586-1603.
56. McCullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321-336.
57. Mellor, D., Bretherton, D., & Firth, L. (2007). Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australia: The dilemma of apologies, forgiveness, and reconciliation. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 13(1), 11-36.
58. Michman, D. (Ed.). (2002). Remembering the Holocaust in Germany 1945 - 2000: German strategies and Jewish responses. New York Peter Lang Publishing.
59. Mills, N. (2001). The new culture of apology. Dissent, 48, 113-116
60. Minow, M. (1998). Between vengeance and forgiveness. Boston, MA Beacon.
61. Minow, M. (2002). Breaking the cycles of hatred: Memory, law, and repair. Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press.
62. Mullet, E. & Neto, F. (2009). Lay people's view on intergroup forgiveness. Peace Review, 21, 457-463.
63. Nadler, A., & Liviatan, I. (2006). Intergroup reconciliation: Effects of adversary's expressions of empathy, responsibility, and recipients' trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 459-470.
64. Nadler, A., & Saguy, T. (2004). Reconciliation between nations: Overcoming emotional deterrents to ending conflicts between groups. In H. J. Langholtz & C. E. Stout (Eds.). The psychology of diplomacy: Psychological dimensions to war and peace (pp. 29-46). Westport, CT Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group.
65. Nietzsche, F.W. (1887). The genealogy of morals. London S.P.C.K.
66. Niven, B. (2001). Facing the Nazi past: Unified Germany and the legacy of the Third Reich. London Routledge.
67. Ohbuchi, K., Kameda, M., & Agarie, N. (1989). Apology as aggression control: Its role in mediating appraisal of and response to harm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 219-227.
68. Oliner, S. P. (2008). Altruism, intergroup apology, forgiveness and reconciliation. St. Paul, MN Paragon House.
69. O'Malley, M. N. & Greenberg, J. (1983). Sex differences in restoring justice: The down payment effect. Journal of Research in Personality, 17, 174-185.
70. Pennebaker, J. W., Páez, D., & Rimé, B. (1997). Collective memory of political events: Social psychological perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
71. Philpot, C. R., Balvin, N., Mellor, D., & Bretherton, D. (2011) Exploring the benefits and limits of collective apologies: The case of Australia's apology to its Indigenous people. Unpublished manuscript.
72. Philpot, C. R., & Hornsey, M. J. (2008). What happens when groups say sorry: The effect of intergroup apologies on their recipients. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 474-487.
73. Philpot, C. R., & Hornsey, M. J. (2011). Memory for intergroup apologies and its relationship with forgiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 96-106.
74. Powell, A. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Schmitt, M. T. (2005). Inequality as ingroup privilege or outgroup disadvantage: The impact of group focus in collective guilt and interracial attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 508-521.
75. Rauer, V. (2006). Symbols in action: Willy Brandt's kneefall at the Warsaw Memorial. In J. C. Alexander, B. Giesen, & J. L. Mast (Eds.), Social performance (pp. 257-282). New York Cambridge University Press.
76. Reconciliation Australia. (2009, February 7). Australian Reconciliation barometer: Indigenous sample results. Retrieved February 1, 2011 from .
77. Rensmann, L. (2004). Collective guilt, national identity and political processes in contemporary Germany. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.). Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 169-190). New York Cambridge University Press.
78. Rudd, K. (2009). Transcript of address at the apology to the Forgotten Australians and former child migrants. Retrieved February 17, 2011 from .
79. Sahdra, B., & Ross, M. (2007). Group identification and historical memory. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 384-395.
80. Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., & Brehm, J. W. (2004). Gender inequality and the intensity of men's collective guilt. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 75-92). New York Cambridge University Press.
81. Shnabel, N., & Nadler, A. (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 116-132.
82. Skarlicki, D. P., Folger, R., & Gee, J (2004). When social accounts backfire: Effects of a polite message or an apology on reactions to an unfair outcome. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 322-341.
83. Smith, E. R. (1999). Affective and cognitive implications of group membership becoming part of the self: New models of prejudice and of the self-concept. In D. Abrams & M. Hogg (Eds.). Social identity and social cognition (pp. 183-196). Oxford Blackwell Publishers.
84. Smith, N. (2008). I was wrong: The meanings of apologies. New York Cambridge University Press.
85. Staub, E. (2003). The psychology of good and evil: Why children, adults, and groups help and harm others. New York Cambridge University Press.
86. Staub, E. (2004). Reconciliation after genocide, mass killing or intractable conflict: Healing, understanding the roots of violence and the prevention of new violence. Unpublished manuscript, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
87. Staub, E. (2006). Reconciliation after genocide, mass killing, or intractable conflict: Understanding the roots of violence, psychological recovery, and steps toward a general theory. Political Psychology, 27, 867-894.
88. Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.). Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago Nelson Hall.
89. Takaku, S. (2001). The effects of apology and perspective taking on interpersonal forgiveness: A dissonance-attribution model of interpersonal forgiveness. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141, 494-508.
90. Tavuchis, N. (1991). Mea Culpa: A society of apology and reconciliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
91. Tomlinson, E. C., Dineen, B. R., & Lewicki, R. J. (2004). The road to reconciliation: Antecedents of victim willingness to reconcile following a broken promise. Journal of Management, 30, 165-187.
92. Tutu, D. (1999). No future without forgiveness. London Random House.
93. Viles, P. (2002, March 27). Suit seeks billions in reparations. Cable News Network (CNN). Retrieved February 7, 2011 from .
94. Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 151-176.
95. Weiner, B., Graham, S., Peter, O., & Zmuidinas, M. (1991). Public confession and forgiveness. Journal of Personality, 59, 281-312.
96. Witvliet, C. V. O. (2001). Forgiveness and health: Review and reflections on a matter of faith, feelings, and physiology. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 29, 212-224.
97. Wohl, M. J. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2005). Forgiveness and collective guilt assignment to historical perpetrator groups depend on level of social category inclusiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 288-303.
98. Wohl, M. J. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2008). Collective angst: How threats to the future vitality of the ingroup shape intergroup emotion. In H. Wayment & J. Bauer (Eds.), Transcending self-interest: Psychological explorations of the quiet ego (pp. 171-181). Washington, DC American Psychological Association.
99. Wohl, M. J. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (in press). Guilt: Personal and collective. In D. J. Christie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of peace psychology. New York Wiley-Blackwell.
100. Wohl, M. J. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Klar, Y. (2006a). Collective guilt: An emotional response to perceived ingroup misdeeds. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 1-37.
101. Wohl, M. J. A., Hornsey, M. J., & Bennett, S. H. (2011). Why group apologies succeed and fail: Intergroup forgiveness and the role of primary and secondary emotions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
102. Wohl, M. J. A., Kuiken, D., & Noels, K. A. (2006b). Three ways to forgive: A numerically aided phenomenological study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 547-561.
103. Wohl, M. J. A., & McGrath, A. L. (2007). The perception of time heals all wounds: Temporal distance affects willingness to forgive following an interpersonal transgression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1023-1035.
104. Wohl, M. J. A., Matheson, K., Branscombe, N. R., & Anisman, H. (2008). An apology on the national stage: The moderating role of collective guilt in both victim and perpetrator responses to the Canadian Government's apology for the head tax placed on Chinese immigrants. Unpublished raw data.
105. Wohl, M. J. A., & Squires, E. C. (2010). Timing is everything: The time at which an apology is given affects willingness to forgive. Unpublished raw data.