Repeatability and reproducibility of biometry and keratometry measurements using a noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer and keratometer

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 153, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Shammas, H John ^a,c   Hoffer, Kenneth J ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b JULES STEIN EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c Shammas Eye Medical Center   (United States)

^d St Mary's Eye Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTERIOR EYE CHAMBER DEPTH; AQUEOUS HUMOR; ARTICLE; ASTIGMATISM; BIOMETRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EYE AXIS LENGTH; EYE SURGERY; HUMAN; KERATOMETRY; LENS; NONCONTACT OPTICAL LOW COHERENCE REFLECTOMETER AND KERATOMETER; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY;

EID: 83555176177     PISSN: 00029394     EISSN: 18791891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.06.012     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. M.P. Holzer, M. Mamusa, G.U. Auffarth Accuracy of a new partial coherence interferometry analyzer for biometric measurements Br J Ophthalmol 93 2 2009 807 810
2. P.J. Buckhurst, J.S. Wolffsohn, S. Shah, S.A. Naroo, L.N. Davies, E.J. Berrow A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients Br J Ophthalmol 93 7 2009 943 953
3. K. Rohrer, B.E. Frueh, R. Walti, I.A. Clemetson, C. Tappeiner, D. Goldblum Comparison and evaluation of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer Ophthalmology 116 11 2009 2087 2092
4. L.P. Cruysberg, M. Doors, F. Verbakel, T.T.J.M. Berendschot, J. De Brabander, R.M.M.A. Nuijts Evaluation of the Lenstar LS 900 non-contact biometer Br J Ophthalmol 94 1 2010 106 110
5. K.J. Hoffer, H.J. Shammas, G. Savini Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length J Cataract Refract Surg 36 4 2010 644 648
6. T.M. Rabsilber, C. Jepsen, G.U. Auffarth, M.P. Holzer Intraocular lens power calculation: clinical comparison of 2 optical biometry devices J Cataract Refract Surg 36 2 2010 230 234
7. ISO 5725 Precision of Test Methods-Determination of Repeatability and Reproducibility for a Standard Test Method by Inter-laboratory tests 2nd ed. 1986 International Organization for Standardization Geneva
8. J.M. Bland, D.G. Altman Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1 8476 1986 307 310
9. M. Packer, I.H. Fine, R.S. Hoffman, P.G. Coffman, L.K. Brown Immersion A-scan compared with partial coherence interferometry; outcomes analysis J Cataract Refract Surg 28 2 2002 239 242
10. A.B. Bhatt, A.C. Schefler, W.J. Feuer, S.H. Yoo, T.G. Murray Comparison of predictions made by the Intraocular Lens Master and ultrasound biometry Arch Ophthalmol 126 7 2008 929 933
11. K.J. Hoffer The Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas J Cataract Refract Surg 19 6 1993 700 712 errata, 1994;20(6):677 and 2007;33(1):23
12. J.T. Holladay, T.C. Praeger, T.Y. Chandler, K.H. Musgrove, J.W. Lewis, R.S. Ruiz A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations J Cataract Refract Surg 14 1 1988 17 24
13. J.A. Retzlaff, D.R. Sanders, M.C. Kraff Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula J Cataract Refract Surg 16 3 1990 333 340 erratum 1990;16(4):528
14. W. Haigis The Haigis formula H.J. Shammas, Intraocular Lens Power Calculations 2004 Slack, Inc. Thorofare, NJ 41 57
15. J.T. Holladay Holladay IOL Consultant User's Guide and Reference Manual 1999 Holladay LASIK Institute Houston
16. T. Olsen Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85 5 2007 472 485
17. H.J. Shammas, C. Chan Precision of biometry, keratometry and refractive measurements with a partial coherence interferometry-keratometry device J Cataract Refract Surg 36 9 2010 1474 1478