Surveillance mammography for detecting ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence and metachronous contralateral breast cancer: A systematic review

European Radiology

Volumn 21, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 2484-2491

  Robertson, Clare ^a   Ragupathy, Senthil Kumar Arcot ^b   Boachie, Charles ^a   Fraser, Cynthia ^a   Heys, Steve D ^b   MacLennan, Graeme ^a   Mowatt, Graham ^a   Thomas, Ruth E ^a   Gilbert, Fiona J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b ABERDEEN ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Diagnostic accuracy; Mammography; Neoplasm recurrence, local; Neoplasm, second primary; Surveillance

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; METACHRONOUS CONTRALATERAL BREAST CANCER; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TUMOR RECURRENCE;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; NEOPLASMS, SECOND PRIMARY; PALPATION; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 83555174921     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2226-z     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Cancer Research UK (2009) Breast cancer-survival statistics. Cancer Research UK, London. Available via http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/ types/breast/survival/. Accessed December 2010
2. B Fowble LJ Solin DL Schultz, et al. 1990 Breast recurrence following conservative surgery and radiation: patterns of failure, prognosis, and pathologic findings from mastectomy specimens with implications for treatment Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 19 833 842 2170305 10.1016/0360-3016(90)90002-2 1:STN:280:DyaK3M%2FgvVGmtg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 20345149)
3. E Joseph M Hyacinthe GH Lyman, et al. 1998 Evaluation of an intensive strategy for follow-up and surveillance of primary breast cancer Ann Surg Oncol 5 522 528 9754761 10.1007/BF02303645 1:STN:280:DyaK1cvisFOmtA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28421752)
4. SG Orel RH Troupin EA Patterson, et al. 1992 Breast cancer recurrence after lumpectomy and irradiation: role of mammography in detection Radiology 183 201 206 1312733 1:STN:280:DyaK387ps1aqsA%3D%3D
5. WL Lu 2009 Impact on survival of early detection of isolated breast recurrences after the primary treatment for breast cancer: A meta-analysis Breast Cancer Res Treat 114 403 412 18421576 10.1007/s10549-008-0023-4 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1M7mslKmuw%3D%3D
6. P Whiting AW Rutjes JB Reitsma, et al. 2003 The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews BMC Med Res Methodol 3 25 14606960 10.1186/1471-2288-3-25
7. B Bone P Aspelin B Isberg, et al. 1995 Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast in patients with breast implants after cancer surgery Acta Radiol 36 111 116 7710787 1:STN:280:DyaK2M3is1WgsA%3D%3D
8. MJ Kim EK Kim JY Kwak, et al. 2009 Sonographic surveillance for the detection of contralateral metachronous breast cancer in an Asian population AJR Am J Roentgenol 192 221 228 19098203 10.2214/AJR.07.4048
9. P Belli G Pastore M Romani, et al. 2002 Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of recurrence after breast conserving therapy Rays 27 241 257 12696288
10. PJ Drew MJ Kerin LW Turnbull, et al. 1998 Routine screening for local recurrence following breast-conserving therapy for cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast Ann Surg Oncol 5 265 270 9607630 10.1007/BF02303784 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3mvVKntA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28249319)
11. H Mumtaz T Davidson MA Hall-Craggs, et al. 1997 Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and conventional triple assessment in locally recurrent breast cancer Br J Surg 84 1147 1151 9278665 10.1002/bjs.1800840831 1:STN:280:DyaK2svisVGmsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 27359498)
12. A Rieber E Merkle H Zeitler, et al. 1997 Value of MR mammography in the detection and exclusion of recurrent breast carcinoma J Comput Assist Tomogr 21 780 784 9294575 10.1097/00004728-199709000-00024 1:STN:280:DyaK2svktValug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28049628)
13. P Viehweg K Rotter M Laniado, et al. 2004 MR imaging of the contralateral breast in patients after breast-conserving therapy Eur Radiol 14 402 408 14531008 10.1007/s00330-003-2086-2 (Pubitemid 38324914)
14. JH Shin BK Han YH Choe, et al. 2005 Ultrasonographic detection of occult cancer in patients after surgical therapy for breast cancer J Ultrasound Med 24 643 649 15840796
15. F Ternier G Houvenaeghel F Lecrivain, et al. 2006 Computed tomography in suspected local breast cancer recurrence Breast Cancer Res Treat 100 247 254 17033929 10.1007/s10549-006-9218-8 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28nls12qsA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 44707918)
16. National Insitute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2009) NICE CG80 Early and locally advanced breast cancer: full guideline. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London. Available via http://guidance.nice.org. uk/CG80/Guidance/pdf/English. Accessed December 2010.
17. National Cancer Institute (2009) Breast cancer screening: Q&A. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MA. Available via http://www.cancer.gov/ newscenter/qa/2009/breastscreenqa. Accessed December 2010
18. J Zakhireh B Fowble LJ Esserman 2008 Application of screening principles to the reconstructed breast J Clin Oncol 28 173 180 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7588
19. GP Barnsley E Grunfeld D Coyle, et al. 2007 Surveillance mammography following the treatment of primary breast cancer with breast reconstruction: a systematic review Plast Reconstr Surg 120 1125 1132 17898585 10.1097/01.prs.0000279143.66781.9a 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtFemtLnJ (Pubitemid 47493935)