Sonographic surveillance for the detection of contralateral metachronous breast cancer in an Asian population

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 192, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 221-228

  Min, Jung Kim ^a   Kim, Eun Kyung ^a   Jin, Young Kwak ^a   Park, Byeong Woo ^a   Kim, Seung Il ^a   Sohn, Joohyuk ^a   Ki, Keun Oh ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast cancer screening; Breast sonography; Mammography; Women's imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASIAN; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; KOREA; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS, SECOND PRIMARY; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 58149269203     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.4048     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Kim MJ, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Park BW, Kim SI, Oh KK. Bilateral synchronous breast cancer in an Asian population: mammographic and sonographic characteristics, detection methods, and staging. AJR 2008; 190:208-213
2. Kim MJ, Kim EK, Kwak JY, et al. Role of sonography in the detection of contralateral metachronous breast cancer in an Asian population. AJR 2008; 190:476-480
3. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). Reston, VA: ACR, 2003
4. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995; 196:123-134
5. Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC. Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 1992; 184:613-617
6. Ma L, Fishell E, Wright B, Hanna W, Allan S, Boyd NF. Case-control study of factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992; 84:781-785
7. Crystal P, Strano SD, Shcharynski S, Koretz MJ. Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. AJR 2003; 181:177-182
8. Kaplan SS. Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 2001; 221:641-649
9. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology 1998; 207:191-199
10. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002; 225: 165-175
11. Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC, et al. Breast MRI screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology 2000; 215:267-279
12. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR). Quality determinants of mammography, October 1994. Clinical practice guideline no. 13, AHCPR publication no. 95-0632, 1994
13. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography versus mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008; 299:2151-2163
14. Kopans DB, Monsees B, Feig SA. Screening for cancer: when is it valid? Lessons from the mammography experience. Radiology 2003; 229:319-327
15. Buchberger W, DeKoekkoek-Doll P, Springer P, Obrist P, Dünser M. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. AJR 1999; 173:921-927
16. Rothschild P, Kimme-Smith C, Bassett LW, Gold RH. Ultrasound breast examination of asymptomatic patients with normal but radiodense mammograms. Ultrasound Med Biol 1988; 14[suppl 1]: 113-119
17. Gordon PB, Goldenberg SL, Chan NH. Solid breast lesions: diagnosis with US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Radiology 1993; 189:573-580
18. Giuseppetti GM, Rizzatto G, Gozzi G, Ercolani P. Role of ultrasonics in the diagnosis of subclinical carcinoma of the breast [in Italian]. Radiol Med (Torino) 1989; 78:339-342
19. Egan RL, Egan KL. Automated water-path full-breast sonography: correlation with histology of 176 solid lesions. AJR 1984; 143:499-507
20. Chen Z, Wu AH, Gauderman WJ, et al. Does mammographic density reflect ethnic differences in breast cancer incidence rates? Am J Epidemiol 2004; 159:140-147
21. Ursin G, Bernstein L, Pike MC. Breast cancer. Cancer Surv 1994; 19-20:241-264
22. Bray F, McCarron P, Parkin DM. The changing global patterns of female breast cancer incidence and mortality. Breast Cancer Res 2004; 6:229-239
23. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al.; American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Advisory Group. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57:75-89 [Erratum in CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57:185]
24. Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA, et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with MRI, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 2004; 292:1317-1325
25. Sardanelli F, Podo F, D'Agnolo G, et al. Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results. Radiology 2007; 242:698-715
26. Lehman CD, Isaacs C, Schnall MD, et al. Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multiinstitution breast cancer screening study. Radiology 2007; 244:381-388
27. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, et al. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and MRI for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:8469-8476
28. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB. Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization. Radiology 2006; 241:355-365