Surveillance mammography following the treatment of primary breast cancer with breast reconstruction: A systematic review

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 120, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1125-1132

  Barnsley, G Philip ^a   Grunfeld, Eva ^b   Coyle, Douglas ^b   Paszat, Lawrence ^b  

^a QUEEN ELIZABETH II HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CANCER RECURRENCE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTECTOMY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NEOPLASM RECURRENCE, LOCAL; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE;

EID: 34848909360     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000279143.66781.9a     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Deonandan, R., Campbell, K., Ostbye, T., et al. A comparison of methods for measuring socio-economic status by occupation or postal area. Chronic Dis. Can. 21: 114, 2000.
2. Greenlee, R., Murray, T., Bolden, S., and Wingo, P. Cancer Statistics 2000. CA Cancer J. Clin. 50: 7, 2000.
3. Burstein, H. J., and Winer, E. Primary care for survivors of breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 343: 1086, 2000.
4. Anderson, B. Surviving cancer. Cancer 74: 1484, 1994.
5. Wingo, P., Ries, L., Giovino, G., et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973-1996, with a special section on lung cancer and tobacco smoking. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 91: 675, 1999.
6. National Cancer Institute of Canada. Statistics Canada: Canadian Cancer Statistics 2004.
7. National Cancer Institute. Cancer Control and Population Sciences: Estimated U.S. Cancer Prevalence. Washington, D.C.: National Cancer Institute, 2004.
8. Fisher, B., Redmond, C., Fisher, E. R., et al. Ten-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing radical mastectomy and total mastectomy with or without radiation. N. Engl. J. Med. 312: 674, 1985.
9. Lazovich, D., Solomon, C. C., Thomas, D. B., et al. Breast conservation therapy in the United States following the 1990 National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on the treatment of patients with early stage invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer 86: 628, 1999.
10. Baxter, N., Goel, V., and Semple, J. L. Utilization and regional variation of breast reconstruction in Canada. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 115: 338, 2005.
11. Lythgoe, J. P., and Palmer, M. K. Manchester regional breast study: 5 and 10 year results. Br. J. Surg. 69: 693, 1982.
12. Fajardo, L. L., Roberts, C. C., and Hunt, K. R. Mammographic surveillance of breast cancer patients: Should the mastectomy site be imaged? A.J.R. Am. J. Roentgenol. 161: 953, 1993.
13. Fisher, B., Slack, N. H., Cavanagh, P. J., et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of breast cancer: Results of the NSABP clinical trial. Ann. Surg. 172: 711, 1970.
14. Recht, A., Schnitt, S. J., Connolly, J. L., et al. Prognosis following local or regional recurrence after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early stage breast carcinoma. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 16: 3, 1989.
15. Fowble, B., Solin, L. J., Schultz, D. J., et al. Breast recurrence following conservative surgery and radiation: Patterns of failure, prognosis, and pathologic findings from mastectomy specimens with implications for treatment. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 19: 833, 1990.
16. Pass, H., Vicini, F. A., Kestin, L. L., et al. Changes in management techniques and patterns of disease recurrence over time in patients with breast carcinoma treated with breast-conserving therapy at a single institution. Cancer 101: 713, 2004.
17. Grunfeld, E., Noorani, H., McGahan, L., et al. Surveillance mammography after treatment of primary breast cancer: A systematic review. Breast 11: 228, 2002.
18. Grunfeld, E., Dhesy-Thind, S., and Levine, M. Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer (summary of the 2005 update). C.M.A.J. 172: 1319, 2005.
19. Weight, S. C., Windle, R., and Stotter, A. T. Optimizing surveillance mammography following breast conservation surgery. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 28: 11, 2002.
20. Smith, T. J., Davidson, N. E., Schapira, D. V., et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 1998 update of recommended breast cancer surveillance guidelines. J. Clin. Oncol. 17: 1080, 1999.
21. Polednak, A. P. How frequent is postmastectomy breast reconstructive surgery? A study linking two statewide databases. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 108: 73, 2001.
22. Polednak, A. P. Postmastectomy breast reconstruction in Connecticut: Trends and predictors. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 104: 669, 1999.
23. Morrow, M., Scott, S. K., Menck, H. R., et al. Factors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: A National Cancer Database study. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 192: 1, 2001.
24. Desch, C. E., Penberthy, L. T., Hillner, B. E., et al. A socio-demographic and economic comparison of breast reconstruction, mastectomy, and conservative surgery. Surgery 125: 441, 1999.
25. Christian, C. K., Edge, S., Niland, J., et al. A multi-institutional analysis of the socioeconomic determinants of breast reconstruction. Ann. Surg. 243: 241, 2006.
26. Torresan, R. Z., dos Santos, C. C., Okamura, H., and Alvarenga, M. Evaluation of residual glandular tissue after skin-sparing mastectomies. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 12: 1037, 2005.
27. Kroll, S. S., Khoo, A., Singletary, S. E., et al. Local recurrence risk after skin-sparing and conventional mastectomy: A 6-year follow-up. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 104: 421, 1999.
28. Langstein, H. N., Cheng, M. H., Singletary, S. E., et al. Breast cancer recurrence after immediate reconstruction: Patterns and significance. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 111: 712, 2003.
29. Spiegel, A. J., and Butler, C. E. Recurrence following treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ with skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 111: 706, 2003.
30. Hogge, J. P., Zuurbier, R. A., and de Paredes, E. S. Mammography of autologous myocutaneous flaps. Radiographics 19: S63, 1999.
31. Dowden, R. V. Mammography after implant breast reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 96: 119, 1992.
32. Eidelman, Y., Liebling, R. W., Buchbinder, S., et al. Mammography in the evaluation of masses in breasts reconstructed with TRAM flaps. Ann. Plast. Surg. 41: 229, 1998.
33. Leibman, A. J., Styblo, T. M., and Bostwick, J., III. Mammography of the postreconstruction breast. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 99: 698, 1997.
34. Kollias, J., Evans, A. J., Wilson, A. R., et al. Value of contralateral surveillance mammography for primary breast cancer follow-up. World J. Surg. 24: 983, 2000.
35. Schapira, M. M., McAuliffe, T. L., and Nattinger, A. B. Underutilization of mammography in older breast cancer survivors. Med. Care 38: 281, 2000.
36. Pandya, K. J., McFadden, E. T., Kalish, L. A., et al. A retrospective study of earliest indicators of recurrence in patients on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group adjuvant chemotherapy trials for breast cancer: A preliminary report. Cancer 55: 202, 1985.
37. Senofsky, G. M., Wanebo, H. J., Wilhelm, M. C., et al. Has monitoring of the contralateral breast improved the prognosis in patients treated for primary breast cancer? Cancer 57: 597, 1986.
38. Geller, B. M., Kerlikowske, K., Carney, P. A., et al. Mammography surveillance following breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 81: 107, 2003.
39. Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer. The Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer. C.M.A.J. 158(Suppl. 3): S65, 1998.
40. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (1997). CTFPHC History/Methodology. Available at: http://www.ctfphc.org/. Accessed July 15, 2005.
41. Heinig, A., Heywang-Kobrunner, S. H., Viehweg, P., et al. Value of contrast medium magnetic resonance tomography of the breast in breast reconstruction with implant (in German). Radiologe 37: 710, 1997.
42. Clark, L., Ritter, E., Glazebrook, K., and Tyler, D. Recurrent ductal carcinoma in situ after total mastectomy. J. Surg. Oncol. 71: 182, 1999.
43. Salas, A. P., Helvie, M. A., Wilkins, E. G., et al. Is mammography useful in screening for local recurrences in patients with TRAM flap breast reconstruction after mastectomy for multifocal DCIS? Ann. Surg. Oncol. 5: 456, 1998.
44. Mund, D. F., Wolfson, P., Gorczyca, D. P., et al. Mammographically detected recurrent nonpalpable carcinoma developing in a transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap: A case report. Cancer 74: 2804, 1994.
45. Helvie, M. A., Wilson, T. E., Roubidoux, M. A., et al. Mammographic appearance of recurrent breast carcinoma in six patients with TRAM flap breast reconstructions. Radiology 209: 711, 1998.
46. Helvie, M. A., Bailey, J. E., Roubidoux, M. A., et al. Mammographic screening of TRAMflap breast reconstructions for detection of nonpalpable recurrent cancer. Radiology 224: 211, 2002.
47. National Cancer Institute. Overview of the SEER program. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/about/. Accessed August 10, 2006.