Government Information Networks - Mapping electronic governance cases through public administration concepts

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 29, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2012, Pages

  Janowski, Tomasz ^a   Pardo, Theresa A ^b   Davies, Jim ^c  

^a UNITED NATIONS UNIVERSITY   (Macao)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Collaboration networks; Electronic governance; Governance networks; Government Information Networks; Information and communication technology; Policy networks; Public administration

Indexed keywords

EID: 83455258086     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2011.11.003     Document Type: Editorial

References (31)

1. Agranoff R. Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review 2006, 66:56-65.
2. Agranoff R., McGuire M. Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments 2004, Georgetown University Press.
3. Almazan, R. S. & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (this issue). Are government internet portals evolving towards more interaction, participation, and collaboration? Revisiting the rhetoric of e-government among municipalities. Government Information Quarterly.
4. Andrade, A. & Joia, L. A. (this issue). Organizational structure and ICT strategies in the Brazilian judiciary system. Government Information Quarterly.
5. Concha, G., Astudillo, H., Porrúa, M. & Pimenta, C. (this issue). E-government procurement observatory, maturity model and early measurements. Government Information Quarterly.
6. Dawes S.S., Cresswell A.M., Pardo T.A. From "need to Know'" to "need to share": tangled problems, information boundaries, and the building of public sector knowledge networks. Public Administration Review 2009, 69(3):392-402.
7. Dawes, S., Gharawi, M., & Burke, G. B. (this issue). Transnational public sector knowledge networks: Knowledge and information sharing in a multi-dimensional context. Government Information Quarterly.
8. Dedeurwaerdere T. The contribution of network governance to sustainable development. Les séminaires de l'IDDRI 2005, 13:1-15.
9. Field T. The e-government imperative 2003, OECD Publishing.
10. Goldsmith S., Eggers W.D. Governing by network: The new shape of the public sector 2004, Brookings Institution Press.
11. Goldsmith S., Eggers W.D. Governing by network: CIOs and the new public sector. Public CIO 2004, November, Retrieved from. http://www.govtech.com/magazines/pcio/Governing-by-Network-CIOs-and-the.html.
12. Gong, Y. & Janssen, M. (this issue). From policy implementation to business process management: Principles for creating flexibility and agility. Government Information Quarterly.
13. Grönlund Å., Horan T.A. Introducing e-Gov: history, definitions, and issues. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 2005, 15(1):713-729.
14. Isett K.R., Mergel I.A., LeRoux K., Mischen P.A., Rethemeyer R.K. Networks in public administration scholarship: Understanding where we are and where we need to go. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2011, 21(suppl 1):157-173.
15. Klischewski, R. & Askar, E. (this issue). Linking service development methods to interoperability governance: The case of Egypt. Government Information Quarterly.
16. Knox H., Savage M., Harvey P. Social networks and the study of relations: Networks as method, metaphore and form. Economy and Society 2006, 35(1):113-140.
17. Marsh D., Smith M. Understanding policy networks: Towards a dialectical approach. Political Studies 2000, 48(1):4-21.
18. Misuraca, G. C., Broster, D., & Centeno, C. (this issue). Digital Europe 2030: Designing scenarios for ICT in future governance and policy making. Government Information Quarterly.
19. Naik, G., Joshi, S., & Basavaraj, K. P. (this issue). Fostering inclusive growth through E-Governance Embedded Rural Telecenters (EGERT) in India. Government Information Quarterly.
20. Nam, T. (this issue). Dual effects of the internet on political activism: Reinforcing and mobilizing. Government Information Quarterly.
21. Peterson J., Bomberg E. Decision-making in the European Union 1999, Macmillan Basingstoke.
22. Provan K.G., Fish A., Sydow J. Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management 2007, 33(3):479-516.
23. Reinicke W.H., Deng F.M., Witte J.M. Critical choices: The United Nations, networks, and the future of global governance 2000, IDRC.
24. Scholl H.J. Central research questions in e-government, or which trajectory should the study domain take?. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 2007, 1(1):67-88.
25. Schout A., Jordan A. Coordinated European governance: Self organizing or centrally steered?. Public Administration 2005, 83(1):201-220.
26. Stoker G. Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal 1998, 50(155):17-28. (Wiley Online Library).
27. Toole J.O. Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review 1997, 57(1):45-52.
28. Wang, F. (this issue). From potential users to actual users: Use of e-government service by Chinese migrant farmer workers. Government Information Quarterly.
29. Yang, T.-M., Zheng, L., & Pardo, T. A. (this issue). The boundaries of information sharing and integration: A case study of Taiwan e-government. Government Information Quarterly.
30. Yildiz M. E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly 2007, 24(3):646-665. (Elsevier).
31. Yu, H., Taduri, S., Kesan, J., Lau, G., & Law, K. (this issue). Mining information across multiple domains: A case study of application to patent laws and regulations in biotechnology. Government Information Quarterly.