Evidence, research, and clinical practice: A patient-centered framework for progress in wound care

Ostomy Wound Management

Volumn 57, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 26-38

  Van Rijswijk, Lia ^a,b   Gray, Mikel ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b HOLY FAMILY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bandages; Evidence based practice; Patient centered care; Policy; Wounds

Indexed keywords

EVIDENCE BASED NURSING; HUMAN; INJURY; NURSING; PATIENT CARE; REVIEW;

EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING; HUMANS; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 83455255442     PISSN: 08895899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. United States Department Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020. Available at: www.healthypeople.gov/. Accessed December 30, 2010.
2. Harrison MB, Graham ID, Lorimer K, Friedberg E, Pierscianowski T, Brandys T. Leg ulcer care in the community, before and after implementation of an evidence-based service. CMAJ. 2004;172(11):1447-1452.
3. Dugdall H, Watson R. What is the relationship between nurses' attitude to evidence based practice and the selection of wound care procedures? J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(10):1442-1450.
4. van Rijswijk L, Beitz J. The traditions and terminology of wound dressings: food for thought. J WOCN. 1998;25:116-122. (Pubitemid 128708288)
5. Cowan LJ, Stechmiller J. Prevalence of wet-to-dry dressings in wound care. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009;22:567-573.
6. Baumgarten M, Margolis D, Orwig D, Hawkes W. Use of pressure- redistributing support surfaces among elderly hip fracture patients across the continuum of care: adherence to pressure ulcer prevention guidelines. Gerontologist. 2010;50(2):253-262.
7. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WC. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996;312(7023):71-72.
8. United States Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Guidance for Industry Chronic Cutaneous Ulcer and Burn Wounds-Developing Products for Treatment. June 2006. Available at: www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/5512fnl.pdf. Accessed: May 1, 2010.
9. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC. National Academy Press. Available at: www.nap.edu. Accessed September 12, 2010.
10. Depp C, Lebowitz BD. Clinical trials: bridging the gap between efficacy and effectiveness. Int Rev Psychiatr. 2007;19(5):531-539. (Pubitemid 47493737)
11. Gartlehner G, Hansen RA, Nissman D, Lohr KN, Carey TS. Criteria for Distinguishing Effectiveness From Efficacy Trials in Systematic Reviews. Technical Review 12 (Prepared by the RTI-International-University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290- 02-0016.) AHRQ Publication No. 06-0046. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. April 2006.
12. Akobeng AK. Assessing the validity of clinical trials. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutri. 2008;47:277-282.
13. Berwick DM. A user's manual for the IOM's 'quality chasm' report. Health Affairs. 2002;21:80-90.
14. Lebowitz BD. Clinical trials in late life: new science in old paradigms. Gerontologist. 2004;44:452-458. (Pubitemid 39128879)
15. Zimmerman M, Mattia JI, Posternak MA. Are subjects in pharmacological treatment trials of depression representative of patients in routine clinical practice? Am J Psychiatr. 2002;159:469-473. (Pubitemid 34184745)
16. Clegg A, Kring D, Plemmons J, Richbourg L. North Carolina wound nurses examine heel pressure ulcers. J WOCN. 2009;36(6):635-639.
17. Donini LM, De Felice MR, Tagliaccica A, De Bernardini L, Cannella C. Comorbidity, frailty, and evolution of pressure ulcers in geriatrics. Med Sci Mon. 2005;11(7):CR326-CR336. (Pubitemid 40992197)
18. Luce BR, Drummond M, Jönsson B, Neumann PJ, Schwartz JS, Siebert, U, Sullivan SD. EBM, HTA, and CER: clearing the confusion. Milbank Quarterly. 2010:88(2):256-276.
19. AdvaMed. About Our Industry. Available at: www.advamed.org/MemberPortal/ About/Industry/. Accessed August 26, 2010.
20. Gottrup F, Apelqvist J, Price P. Outcomes in controlled and comparative studies on nonhealing wounds. Recommendations to improve quality of evidence in wound management. EWMA Patient Outcome Group document. J Wound Care. 2010;19(6):239-268.
21. Ashby R, Bland JM, Cullum N, Dumville J, Hall J, Kang'ombe A, et al. Reflections on the recommendations of the EWMA patient outcome group document. J Wound Care. 2010;19(7):282-284.
22. White R. Reflections on the recommendations of the EWMA patient outcome group document. J Wound Care. 2010;19(7):284-285.
23. Lloyd-Vossen J. Implementing wound care guidelines: observations from the bedside. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2009;55(6):50-55.
24. Bolton LL. Operational definition of moist wound healing. J WOCN. 2007;34(1):23-29.
25. Ubbink DT, Vermeulen H, Goossens A, Kelner RB, Schreuder SM, Lubbers MJ. Wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Surg 2008;143(10):950-955.
26. Kerstein MD, Gemmen E, van Rijswijk L, Lyder C, Phillips T, Xakellis G, et al. Cost and cost effectiveness of venous and pressure ulcer protocols of care. Dis Manage Health Outcomes. 2001;9(11):651-636.
27. van Rijswijk L. Ingredient-based wound dressing classification: a paradigm that is passé and in need of replacement. J Wound Care. 2006;15(1):11-14.
28. Ebell MH, Siwek J, Weiss BD, Woolf SH, Susman J, Ewigman B, Bowman Ml. Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. Am Fam Phys. 2004;68:548-556. (Pubitemid 38176273)
29. Vernon JA, Golec JH, Dimasi JA. Drug development costs when financial risk is measured using the Fama-French three-factor model. Health Economics. 2010;19(8):1002-1005.
30. United States Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Premarket Notification (510k). Available at: www.fda. gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/HowtoMarketYour Device/PremarketSubmissions/PremarketNotification510k/default.htm. Accessed January 26, 2011.
31. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration. Center for Devices and Radiological Health 510(k) Working Group Preliminary Report and Recommendations, and Task Force on the Utilization of Science in Regulatory Decision Making Preliminary Report and Recommendations. Availability; Request for Comments. Federal Register. August 5, 2010;75(150).
32. Bradley M, Cullum N, Sheldon T. The debridement of chronic wounds: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(17 Pt 1).
33. Nixon J, Nelson EA, Cranny G, Iglesias CP, Hawkins K, Cullum NA, et al. Pressure relieving support surfaces: a randomised evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2006;10(22).
34. Iglesias C, Nelson EA, Cullum NA, Torgerson DJ, on behalf of the VenUS Team. VenUS I: a randomised controlled trial of two types of bandage for treating venous leg ulcers. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(29).
35. Sullivan N, Snyder DL, Tipton K, Uhl S, Schoelles KM. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Devices; Technology Assessment Report. Project ID: WNDT1108. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. 2009. Available at: www.ahrq.gov/clinic/ta/negpresswtd/. Accessed: September 15, 2010.
36. Hailey D, Jacobs P, Perry DC, Chuck A, Morrison A, Boudreau R. Adjunctive Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcer: An Economic Analysis [Technology report no. 75]. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2007. Available at: http://cadth.ca/media/ pdf/274-HBOT-tr-e.pdf. Accessed August 16, 2011.
37. Zanca JM, Brienza DM, Berlowitz D, Bennett RG, Lyder CH, and the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Pressure ulcer research in America: creation and analysis of an on-line database. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2003;16:190-197.
38. Bolton L. Evidence-based medicine in wound-care: in support of the Renaissance. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2008;54(6):6-8.
39. Carter MJ. Evidence-based medicine: an overview of key concepts. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2010;56(4):68-85.
40. Sox HC, Greenfield, S. Comparative effectiveness research: a report from the Institute of Medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:203-205.
41. Conway PH, Clancy C. Comparative-Effectiveness Research - Implications of the Federal Coordinating Council's Report. NEJM. Available at: http://nejm.org. Accessed July 23, 2009.
42. Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Report from the methodology committee to the board of governors. March 8, 2011. Available at: http:// pcori.org/images/MC-Report-03-08-2011.pdf. Accessed June 20, 2011.
43. Stewart M. Towards a global definition of patient-centered care. BMJ. 2001:322:444-445.
44. Joanna Briggs Institute. The Joanna Briggs approach to evidence-based practice. 2008. Available at: www.joannabriggs.edu.au/pdf/about/Approach.pdf. Accessed May 15, 2011.
45. Omura Y, Kazuharu S, Kenji O. Development of methods for skin barrier peeling tests. J WOCN. 2006;33(5):510-517. (Pubitemid 44915811)
46. van Rijswijk L, Braden BJ. Pressure ulcer patient and wound assessment: an AHCPR clinical practice guideline update. Ostomy Wound Manage. 1999;45(suppl 1A):56S-67S.
47. Ochs RF, Horn SD, van Rijswijk L, Pietsch C, Smouth RJ. Comparison of air-fluidized therapy with other support surfaces used to treat pressure ulcers in nursing home residents. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2005;51(2):38-68.
48. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guidance on the use of debriding agents and specialist wound care clinics for difficult to heal wounds. Technology Appraisal #24, 2001 (reviewed 2004). Available at: www.nice. org.uk. Accessed June 20, 2011.
49. Teutsch SM, Burger ML, Weinstein MC. Comparative effectiveness: asking the right questions, choosing the right method. Health Affairs. 2005;24(1):128-132. (Pubitemid 40169780)
50. Vernon JA, Goldberg R, Golec J. Economic evaluation and cost-effectiveness thresholds: signals to firms and implications for R&D investment and innovation. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(10):797-806.
51. Neumann PJ, Kamae MS, Palmer, JA. Medicare's national coverage decisions for technologies, 1999-2007. Health Affairs. 2008;27(6):1620-1631.
52. Levine S, Nass P, Rogstad T. Effectiveness Guidance Document. Devices for local treatment of chronic wounds. Center for Medical Technology Policy. 2009. Available at: www.cmtpnet.org. Accessed May 14, 2010.