Testing and validating frames for online organizations

Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Practices, CSCL 2009 Conference Proceedings - 9th International Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 307-311

  Scherff, Lisa ^a   Prado, Josie ^a   Singer, Nancy Robb ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

COURSE RELATED; DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING; ELECTRONIC DISCUSSION BOARD; ON-LINE ORGANIZATIONS; ONLINE ENVIRONMENTS; REFRAMING; WEB BASED LEARNING;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 83455248323     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1600053.1600100     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Achinstein, B., & Barrett, A. (2004). (Re)framing classroom contexts: How new teachers and mentors view diverse learners and challenges of practice. Teachers College Record, 106(4), 716-746. [Electronic Version, accessed February 2, 2006]. (Pubitemid 38651887)
2. Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611-639.
3. Bodgan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
4. Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (1994). Becoming a teacher leader: From isolation to collaboration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
5. Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (1997). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. DeWert, M. H., Babinski, L. M., & Jones, B. D. (2003). Safe passages: Providing online support to beginning teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 311-320. (Pubitemid 37104926)
7. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward a clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
8. Ferdig, R. E., & Roehler, L. R. (Winter 2003-2004). Student uptake in electronic discussions: Examining online discourse in literacy pre-service classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 36(2), 119-136.
9. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Free Press.
10. nd ed. (pp. 548-594). New York: Macmillan.
11. Gold, Y. & Roth, R. A. (1993). Teachers managing stress and preventing burnout: The professional health solution. Washington, D.C.: Falmer Press.
12. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
14. Judge, A. (1992). Using disagreements for superordinate frame configuration. Retrieved October 30, 2006, from http://www.laetusinpraesens.org/ docs/frame.php.
15. Merseth, K. K. (1990). Beginning teachers and computer networks: A new form of induction support (Report No. 90-9). East Lansing, MI: The National Center for Research on Teacher Education. Eric Document ED 324 309.
16. Nicholson, S.A., & Bond, N. (2003). Collaborative reflection and professional community building: An analysis of pre-service teachers' use of an electronic discussion board. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 11(2), 259-279.
17. Paulus, T., & Scherff, L. (2008). "Can anyone offer any words of encouragement?": Online dialogue as a support mechanism for pre-service teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(1), 113-136.
18. Romiszowski, A. J., & Ravitz, J. (1997). Computer-mediated communication. In Cr. R. Dilles & A.Romiszowksi (Eds.), Instructional developmental paradigms. (pp. 745-768). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
19. Scherff, L., & Paulus, T. (2006). Encouraging ownership of online spaces: Support for preservice English teachers through computer-mediated communication. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education[Onlineserial],6(4). Available: http://www.citejournal.org/vol6/iss4/ languagearts/article1.cfm
20. Scherff, L. & Singer, N. R. (2008). Framing and re-framing through computer-mediated communication: Providing pre-service teachers with alternate support structures. Learning Inquiry, 2, 151-167.
21. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
22. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Singer, N. R. & Zeni, J. (2004). Building bridges: Creating an online conversation community for pre-service teachers. English Education, 37(1), 30-49.
24. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Tarter, C. J., & Hoy, W. K. (2004). A systems approach to quality in elementary schools: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(5), 539-554.
26. Tobin, T. J., Muller, R. O., & Turner, L. M. (2006). Organizational learning and climate as predictors of selfefficacy. Social Psychology of Education, 9, 301-3.
27. Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2), 143-178.