Inoculation with Ophiostoma novo-ulmi subsp. americana affects photosynthesis, nutrition and oxidative stress in in vitro Ulmus minor plants

Environmental and Experimental Botany

Volumn 77, Issue , 2012, Pages 146-155

  Oliveira, Helena ^a   Sousa, Alexandra ^a   Alves, Artur ^a   Nogueira, António J A ^a   Santos, Conceição ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Dutch Elm Disease, Ophiostoma novo ulmi subsp. americana; In vitro culture; Infection; Ulmus minor

Indexed keywords

BIODEGRADATION; CATALYSIS; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; ELECTROKINESIS; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FILTRATION; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; INFECTIVITY; INOCULATION; MEMBRANE; METAL; NORTHERN HEMISPHERE; NUTRITION; OXIDATION; PATHOGENICITY; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; SENESCENCE; SHRUB; STARCH; VIRAL DISEASE; VIRUS;

FUNGI; OPHIOSTOMA; OPHIOSTOMA NOVO-ULMI SUBSP. AMERICANA; ULMUS; ULMUS MINOR;

EID: 83455235755     PISSN: 00988472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Aebi M. Catalase. Methods of Enzymatic Analysis 1974, vol. 2:673-684. Verlag Chemie-Academic Press, New York.
2. Almeida I., Sousa A., Conde P., Barreiros C., Oliveira H., Santos C., Caldeira G. In vitro and ex-vitro responses of Ulmus minor Mill. to infection by Ophiostoma ulmi. XI Congresso Nacional de Bioquímica 1998, 106.
3. Aoun M., Rioux D., Simard M., Bernier L. Fungal colonization and host defense reactions in Ulmus americana callus cultures inoculated with Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Phytopathology 2009, 99:642-650.
4. Aoun M., Jacobi V., Boyle B., Bernier L. Identification and monitoring of Ulmus americana transcripts during in vitro interactions with the Dutch Elm Disease pathogen Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2010, 74:254-266.
5. Arnon D. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 1949, 24:1-15.
6. Azevedo H., Pinto G., Santos C. Cadmium effects in sunflower: nutrient imbalances in leaves and calluses. J. Plant Nutr. 2005, 28:2233-2241.
7. Azevedo H., Pinto G., Santos C. Cadmium effects in sunflower: membrane degradation and oxidative stress enzyme activity in leaves and calluses. J. Plant Nutr. 2005, 28:2221-2231.
8. Ben Jouira H., Hassairi A., Bijot C., Dorion N. Adventitious shoot production from strips of stem in the Dutch elm hybrid " Commelin": plantlet regeneration and neomycin sensitivity. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1998, 53:153-160.
9. Biroscikova M., Spisakova K., Liptak S., Pichler V., Durkovic J. Micropropagation of mature wych elm (Ulmus glabra Huds). Plant Cell Rep. 2004, 22:640-644.
10. Bowden C.G., Smalley E., Guries R.P., Hubbes M., Temple B., Horgen P.A. Lack of lack of association between cerato-ulmin production and virulence in Ophiostma novo-ulmi. MPMI 1996, 9:556-564.
11. Bradford M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilising the principle of protein dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1972, 72:248-254.
12. Brasier C.M. Laboratory investigation of Ceratocystis ulmi. Compendium of Elm Diseases 1981, 7-22. American Phytopathological Society. R.J. Stipes, R.J. Campana (Eds.).
13. Brasier C.M., Buck K.W. Rapid evolutionary changes in a globally invading fungal pathogen (Dutch Elm Disease). Biol. Invasions 2001, 3:223-233.
14. Brasier, C.M., Kirk, S.A., Tegli, S.N., 1995. Naturally occurring non cerato-ulmin producing mutants of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi are pathogenic but lack aerial mycelium. Mycol. Res. 99, 436-440.
15. Brito G., Costa A., Fonseca H., Santos C. Response of Olea europaea subsp. maderensis shoots to osmotic stress induced by sorbitol. Sci. Hortic. 2003, 97:411-417.
16. Chaplin M. Monosaccharides. Carbohydrate Analysis 1986, 1-36. IRL Press, Oxford. M. Chaplin, J. Kennedy (Eds.).
17. Conde P., Santos C. An efficient protocol for Ulmus minor Mill. protoplast isolation and culture in agarose droplets. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2006, 86:359-366.
18. Conde P., Loureiro J., Santos C. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from leaves of Ulmus minor Mill. Plant Cell Rep. 2004, 22:632-639.
19. Conde P., Sousa A., Costa A., Santos C. A protocol for Ulmus minor Mill. micropropagation and acclimatization. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2008, 92:113-119.
20. Corredoira E., Vietez A., Ballester A. Somatic embryogenesis in elm. Ann. Bot. 2002, 89:637-644.
21. 2 production in Ulmus pumila and Ulmus campestris cell suspension cultures inoculated with Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Physiol. Plant. 2001, 111:512-518.
22. Dhindsa R., Matowe W. Drought tolerance in mosses correlated with enzymatic defence against lipid peroxidation. J. Exp. Bot. 1981, 32:79-91.
23. Diez J., Gil L. Effects of Ophiostoma ulmi and Ophiostoma novo-ulmi culture filtrates on elm cultures from genotypes with different susceptibility to Dutch Elm Disease. Eur. J. Forest. Pathol. 1998, 28:399-407.
24. Driver J., Kuniyuki A. In vitro propagation of Paradox Walnut rootstock. Hortscience 1984, 109:507-509.
25. Ella E., Kawano N., Ito O. Importance of active oxygen-scavenging system in the recovery of rice seedlings after submergence. Plant Sci. 2003, 163:85-93.
26. Eshita S., Kamalay C., Gingas M., Yaussy D. Establishment and characterization of American elm cell suspension cultures. Plant Cell Tissue Organ. Cult. 2000, 61:245-249.
27. Feller U., Anders I., Demirevska K. Degradation of rubisco and other chloroplast proteins under abiotic stress. Gen. Appl. Plant Physiol. 2008, 34:5-18.
28. Fenning T., Gartland K., Brasier C. Micropropagation and regeneration of english elm, Ulmus procera. J. Exp. Bot. 1996, 44:1211-1217.
29. Gartland J., McHugh A., Brasier C., Irvine R., Fenning T., Gartland K. Regeneration of phenotypically normal English elm (Ulmus procera) plantlets following transfor-mation with an Agrobacterium tumefaciens binary vector. Tree Physiol. 2000, 20:901-907.
30. Gartland J., Brasier C., Fenning T., Birch R., Gartland K. Ri-plasmid mediated transformation and regeneration of Ulmus procera. Plant Growth Regul. 2001, 33:123-129.
31. Green C.E., Guries R.P., Smalley E.B. Screening elms for Dutch Elm Disease resistance. Plant Dis. 1984, 69:60-63.
32. Hagen, L., 1998. How to Identify and Manage Dutch Elm Disease. United States Department of Agriculture. Forest Service NA/PR/07/98.
33. Hauck B., Gay A., Macduff J., Griffins C., Thomas H. Leaf senescence in a non yellowing mutant of Festuca pratensis: implications of the stay green mutation for photosynthesis, growth and nitrogen nutrition. Plant Cell Environ. 1997, 20:1007-1018.
34. Heil M., Bostock R. Induced systemic resistance (ISR) against pathogens in the context of induced plant defences. Ann. Bot. 2002, 89:503-512.
35. Marry M., Roberts K., Jopson S.J., Huxham I.M., Jarvis M.C., Corsar J., Robertson E., McCann M.C. Cell-cell adhesion in fresh sugar-beet root parenchyma requires both pectin esters and calcium cross-links. Physiol. Plant 2006, 126:243-256.
36. Martín J.A., Solla A., Coimbra M., Gil L. Metabolic distinction of Ulmus minor xylem tissues after inoculation with Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Phytochemistry 2005, 66:58-2467.
37. Martín J.A., Solla A., Domingues R., Coimbra M., Gil L. Exogenous phenol increase resistance of Ulmus minor to Dutch Elm Disease through formation of suberin-like compounds on xylem tissues. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2008, 64:97-104.
38. Martín J.A., Solla A., Esteban L.G., Paloma de Palacios P., Gil L. Bordered pit and ray morphology involvement in elm resistance to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Can. J. Forest Res. 2009, 39:420-429.
39. Maxwell K., Johnson G. Chlorophyll fluorescence - a practical guide. J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51. 659-658.
40. Meier F.G., Remphrey W.R. Accumulation of mansonones in callus cultures of Ulmus americana L. in the absence of a fungal-derived elicitor. Can. J. Bot. 1997, 75:513-517.
41. Mittempergher L., Santini A. The history of elm breeding. Invest. Agrar. Sist. Recur. For. 2004, 13:161-177.
42. Möller E.M., Bahnweg G., Sandermann H., Geiger H.H. A simple and efficient protocol for isolation of high molecular weight DNA from filamentous fungi, fruit bodies, and infected plant tissues. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20:6115-6116.
43. Mustard J., Renault S. Effects of NaCl on water relations and cell wall elasticity and composition in red-osier dogwood (Cornus stolonifera) seedlings. Physiol. Plant 2004, 121:265-271.
44. Nasmith C., Jeng R., Hubbes M. A comparison of in vivo targeted gene expression during fungalcolonization of DED-susceptible Ulmus americana. Forest Pathol. 2008, 38:104-112.
45. Newhouse A.E., Schrodt F., Liang H., Maynard C.A., Powell W.A. Transgenic American elm shows reduced Dutch Elm Disease symptoms and normal mycorrhizal colonization. Plant Cell Rep. 2007, 26:977-987.
46. Oliveira H., Barros A., Coimbra M.A., Santos C. Fourier transformation infrared spectroscopy analysis of salt stressed and fungi infected in vitro grapevine plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2009, 65:1-10.
47. Olmos E., Hernandez J.A., Sevilla F., Hellín E. Induction of several antioxidant enzymes in the selection of a salt tolerant cell line of Pisum sativum. J. Plant Physiol. 1994, 114:594-598.
48. Pijut P., Domir S.C., Lineberger R.D., Schreiber L.R. Use of culture filtrates of Ceratocystis ulmi as a bioassay to screen for disease tolerant Ulmus americana. Plant Sci. 1990, 70:191-196.
49. Pipe N.D., Buck K.W., Brasier C.W. Comparison of the cerato-ulmin (cu) gene sequences of the Himalayan Dutch Elm Disease fungus Ophiostoma himal-ulmi with those of O. ulmi and O. novo-ulmi suggests that the cu gene of O. novo-ulmi is unlikely to have been acquired recently from O. himal-ulmi. Mycol. Res. 1997, 101:415-421.
50. Pomerleau R., Mehran A.A. Distribution of spores of Ceratocystis ulmi labeled with phosphorus 32 in green shoots and leaves of Ulmus americana. Naturaliste Can. 1966, 93:577-582.
51. Putter J. Peroxidases. Methods of Enzymatic Analysis 1974, vol. 2:685-690. Verlag Chemie-Academic Press, New York.
52. Sairam R.K., Tyagi A. Physiology and molecular biology of salinity stress tolerance in plants. Curr. Sci. 2004, 86:407-421.
53. Santini A., Montaghi A., Vendramin G.G., Capretti P. Analysis of the Italian Dutch Elm Disease fungal population. J. Phytopathol. 2005, 153:73-79.
54. Santini A., Fagnani A., Ferrini F., Ghelardini L., Mittempergher L. Variation among Italian and French elm clone s in their response to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi inoculation. Forest Pathol. 2005, 35:183-193.
55. Santini A., La Porta N., Ghelardini L., Mittempergher L. Breeding against Dutch Elm Disease adapted to the Mediterranean climate. Euphytica 2008, 163:45-56.
56. Santos C., Fragoeiro S., Phillips A. Physiological response of grapevine cultivars and a rootstock to infection with Phaeoacremonium and Phaeomoniella isolates: an in vitro approach. Sci. Hortic. 2005, 103:187-198.
57. Santos C., Fragoeiro S., Oliveira H., Phillips A. Response of Vitis vinifera L. plants inoculated with Phaeoacremonium angustius and Phaeomoniella chlamydospora to thiabendazole, resveratrol and sodium arsenite. Sci. Hortic. 2006, 107:131-136.
58. Santos C., Fragoeiro S., Phillips A. Phenotypic characterisation of Phaeoacremonium and Phaeomoniella strains isolated from grapevines: enzyme production and virulence of extra-cellular filtrate on grapevine calluses. Sci. Hortic. 2006, 107:123-130.
59. Santos C.V., Campos A., Azevedo A. In situ and in vitro senescence induced by KCl stress: nutritional imbalance, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant metabolism. J. Exp. Bot. 2001, 52(355):351-360.
60. Smalley E.B., Guries R. Breeding elms for resistance to Dutch Elm Disease. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1993, 31:325-352.
61. Smalley E.B., Raffa K.F., Proctor R.H., Klepzig K.D. Tree responses to infection by species of Ophiostoma and Ceratocystis. Ceratocistis and Ophiostoma Taxonomy, Ecology and Patogenicity 1993, APS Press, Minnesota. J. Winfield, K. Seifert, J. Webber (Eds.).
62. Solla A., Gil L. Influence of water stress on Dutch Elm Disease symptoms in Ulmus minor. Can. J. Bot. 2002, 80:810-817.
63. Solla A., Gil L. Xylem vessel diameter as a factor in resistance of Ulmus minor to Ophiostoma novo-ulmi. Forest Pathol. 2002, 32:2-123.
64. Solla A., Gil L. Evaluating Verticillium dahliae for biological control of Ophiostoma novo ulmi in Ulmus minor. Plant Pathol. 2003, 52:5-579.
65. Sousa A., Conde P., Santos C. Effect of Ulmus minor, Mill. Challenge with Ophiostoma ulmi sensu lato on senescence induction and glutamine synthetase activity. I Ibero-American Meeting on Biotechnology 1998.
66. Sutherland M.L., Pearson S., Brasier C.M. The influence of temperature and light on defoliation levels of elm by dutch elm disease. Phytopathology 1997, 87(6):576-581.
67. Takai S. Host-specific factors in Dutch Elm Disease. Host-specific Toxins. Recognition and Specificity Factors in Plant Disease. Proceedings of a Symposium 1989, 75-96. Sogo Printing Co. Ltd., Tottori, Japan. K. Kohmoto, R.D. Durbin (Eds.).
68. Temple B., Horgen P.A., Bernier L., Hintz W.E. Cerato-ulmin, a hydrophobin secreted by the causal agents of Dutch Elm Disease, is a parasitic fitness factor. Fungal Genet. Biol. 1997, 22:39-53.
69. Ter Braak C.J.F., Smilauer P. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User's Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4.5) 2002, Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, New York, 500 pp., http://www.canoco.com.
70. Townsend A.M., Bentz S.E., Douglass L.W. Evaluation of 19 American Elm clones for tolerance to Dutch Elm Disease. J. Environ. Hort. 2005, 23:21-24.
71. Valjakka M., Luomala E.M., Kangasjärvi J., Vapaavuori E. Expression of photosynthesis- and senescence-related genes during leaf development and senescence in silver birch (Betula pendula Roth) seedlings. Physiol. Plant. 1999, 106:302-310.
72. Valle T., Lopez J., Hernandez J., Corchete P. Antifungal activity of scopoletin and its differential accumulation in Ulmus pumila and Ulmus campestris cell suspension cultures infected with Ophiostoma ulmi spores. Plant Sci. 1997, 125:97-101.
73. White T.J., Bruns T., Lee S., Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal genes for phylogenies. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications 1990, 315-322. Academic Press, San Diego, California.
74. Witham F., Blaydes D., Devlin R. Isolation and properties of starch. Experiments in Plant Physiology 1971, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, NY, pp. 27-29.
75. Wojtaszek P. Oxidative burst: an early plant response to pathogen infection. Biochem. J. 1997, 322:681-692.
76. Zwiazek J.J. Cell wall changes in white spruce (Picea glauca) needles subjected to repeated drought stress. Physiol. Plant 1991, 82:513-518.
77. Zar J.H. Biostatistical Analysis 1996, Prentice-Hall International Inc., New Jersey.