Negotiating exchanges of P3P-labeled information for compensation

Computational Intelligence

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 663-677

  Buffett, Scott ^a   Jia, Keping ^a   Liu, Sandy ^a   Spencer, Bruce ^a   Wang, Fang ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Multi attribute utility; Negotiating agents; P3P; Privacy

Indexed keywords

DATA PRIVACY; DECISION MAKING; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; PUBLIC POLICY; WEBSITES; XML;

MULTI-ATTRIBUTE UTILITY; NEGOTIATING AGENTS; PLATFORM FOR PRIVACY PREFERENCES PROJECT (P3P);

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 8344233314     PISSN: 08247935     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0824-7935.2004.00259.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. ASHLEY, P., S. HADA, G. KARJOTH, C. POWERS, and M. SCHUNTER. 2003. Enterprise Privacy Authorization Language (EPAL) specification. http://www.zurich.ibm.com/security/enterprise-privacy/epal/. Accessed on 03 March 2003.
2. CHELLAPPA, R. K., and R. SIN. Personalization versus privacy: An empirical examination of the online consumers dilemma. Information Technology and Management, To appear.
3. CRANOR, L., M. LANGHEINRICH, and M. MARCHIORI. 2002. A P3P Preference Exchange Language 1.0 (APPEL1.0). http://www.w3.org/TR/P3P-preferences/. Accessed on 15 April 2002. W3C Working Draft.
4. CRANOR, L., M. LANGHEINRICH, M. MARCHIORI, M. PRESLER-MARSHALL, and J. REAGLE. 2002. The Platform for Privacy Preferences 1.0 (P3P1.0) Specification. http://www.w3.org/TR/P3P/. Accessed on 16 April 2002. W3C Recommendation.
5. CRANOR, L., and P. RESNICK. 2000. Protocols for automated negotiations with buyer anonymity and seller reputations. Netnomics, 2(1):1-23.
6. CULNAN, M. J., and P. K. ARMSTRONG. 1999. Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: An empirical investigation. Organization Science, 10(1):104-115.
7. CULNAN, M. J., and R. J. BIES. 2003. Customer privacy: Balancing economic and justice considerations. Journal of Social Issues, 59(2):104-115.
8. FARATIN, P., C. SIERRA, and N. R. JENNINGS. 2002. Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations. Artificial Intelligence, 142:205-237.
9. FATIMA, S. S., M. WOOLDRIDGE, and N. R. JENNINGS. 2004. An agenda-based framework for multi-issue negotiation. Artificial Intelligence, 152(1):1-45.
10. GRIMM, R., and A. ROSSNAGEL. 2000. Can p3p help protect privacy worldwide? ACM SIGMM Electronic Proceedings, url = "http://www.acm.org/ sigmm/MM2000/ep/grimm."
11. HANN, I., K. HUI, T. S. LEE, and I. P. L. PNG. 2002. Online information privacy: Measuring the cost-benefit trade-off. In 23rd International Conference on Information Systems.
12. JENNINGS, N. R., P. FARATIN, A. R. LOMUSCIO, S. PARSONS, C. SIERRA, and M. WOOLDRIDGE. 2001. Automated negotiation: Prospects, methods and challenges. International Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation, 10(2):199-215.
13. KEENEY, R. L., and H. RAIFFA. 1976. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. John Wiley and Sons.
14. MEYER, J. 1999. How to manage, negotiate, and transfer personal information on the web. Written at the IBM Almaden Research Center, submitted as diploma thesis at the University of Applied Sciences Hamburg, Germany.
15. CASASSA MONT, M., and M. YEARWORTH. 2002. Negotiated revealing of trader credentials in e-marketplaces mediated by trusted and privacy-aware admittance controllers. http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2001/HPL-2001-216.html. Accessed on 12 September 2002.