A case of confusing probability and confirmation

Synthese

Volumn 184, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 101-107

  Peijnenburg, Jeanne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Coherentism; Confirmation; Conjunction fallacy; Probability

Indexed keywords

EID: 83355176424     PISSN: 00397857     EISSN: 15730964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-009-9692-8     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Crupi V., Tentori K., Gonzalez M. (2007) On Bayesian measures of evidential support: Theoretical and empirical issues. Philosophy of Science 74: 229-252.
2. Crupi V., Fitelson B., Tentori K. (2008) Probability, confirmation, and the conjunction fallacy. Thinking and Reasoning 14. 2: 182-199.
3. Fitelson B. (1999) The plurality of Bayesian measures of confirmation and the problem of measure sensitivity. Philosophy of Science 66: 363-378.
4. Jäger Ch. (2007) Is coherentism coherent?. Analysis 67. 4: 341-344.
5. Noordhof P. (2007) A coherentist response to Stoneham's reductio. Analysis 67. 3: 257-258.
6. Rowbottom D. P. (2007) A refutation of foundationalism?. Analysis 67. 4: 345-346.
7. Shackel N. (2008) Coherentism and the symmetry of epistemic support. Analysis 68. 3: 326-334.
8. Shogenji T. (2003) A condition for transitivity in probabilistic support. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54: 613-616.
9. Stoneham T. (2007) A reductio of coherentism. Analysis 67. 3: 254-257.