Strike: Evaluation of protein MSAs using a single 3D structure

Bioinformatics

Volumn 27, Issue 24, 2011, Pages 3385-3391

  Kemena, Carsten ^a   Taly, Jean Francois ^a   Kleinjung, Jens ^b   Notredame, Cedric ^a  

^a CENTRE FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG   (Spain)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; INTERNET; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SOFTWARE;

EID: 83355171108     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr587     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Altschul, S.F. (1991) Amino acid substitution matrices from an information theoretic perspective. J. Mol. Biol., 219, 555-565.
2. Aniba, M.R. et al. (2010). AlexSys: a knowledge-based expert system for multiple sequence alignment construction and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res., 38, 6338-6349.
3. Berman, H.M. et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 235-242.
4. Bowie, J.U. et al. (1991) A method to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure. Science, 253, 164-170.
5. Chandonia, J.M. et al. (2004) The ASTRAL Compendium in 2004. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, D189-D192.
6. Claude, J.B. et al. (2004) CaspR: a web server for automated molecular replacement using homology modelling. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, W606-W609.
7. Connolly, M.L. (1983) Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. Science, 221, 709-713.
8. Dayhoff, M.O. et al. (1979)Amodel of evolutionary change in proteins. Detecting distant relationships: computer methods and results. In Dayhoff, M.O. (ed) Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure. National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, DC, pp. 353-358.
9. Do, C.B. et al. (2005) ProbCons: probabilistic consistency-based multiple sequence alignment. Genome Res., 15, 330-340.
10. Edgar, R.C. (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, 1792-1797.
11. Grasso, C. and Lee, C. (2004) Combining partial order alignment and progressive multiple sequence alignment increases alignment speed and scalability to very large alignment problems. Bioinformatics, 20, 1546-1556.
12. Henikoff, S. and Henikoff, J.G. (1992) Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 10915-10919.
13. Jones, D.T. et al. (1992) A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature, 358, 86-89.
14. Katoh, K. et al. (2005) MAFFTversion 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res., 33, 511-518.
15. Lassmann, T. and Sonnhammer, E.L. (2005) Automatic assessment of alignment quality. Nucleic Acids Res., 33, 7120-7128.
16. Lin, K. et al. (2003) Testing homology with Contact Accepted mutatiOn (CAO): a contact-based Markov model of protein evolution. Comput. Biol. Chem., 27, 93-102.
17. Lüthy, R. et al. (1992) Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature, 356, 83-85.
18. Marin, A. et al. (2002) FROST: a filter-based fold recognition method. Proteins, 49, 493-509.
19. Markova-Raina, P. and Petrov, D. (2011) High sensitivity to aligner and high rate of false positives in the estimates of positive selection in the 12 Drosophila genomes. Genome Res., 21, 863-874.
20. Mizuguchi, K. et al. (1998) HOMSTRAD: a database of protein structure alignments for homologous families. Protein Sci., 7, 2469-2471.
21. Murzin, A.G. et al. (1995) SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol., 247, 536-540.
22. Notredame, C. et al. (2000) T-Coffee: a novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. J. Mol. Biol., 302, 205-217.
23. O'Sullivan, O. et al. (2004) 3DCoffee: combining protein sequences and structures within multiple sequence alignments. J. Mol. Biol., 340, 385-395.
24. Pei, J. et al. (2003) PCMA: fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment based on profile consistency. Bioinformatics, 19, 427-428.
25. Shi, J. et al. (2001) FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. J. Mol. Biol., 310, 243-257.
26. Sierk, M.L. et al. (2010) Improving pairwise sequence alignment accuracy using nearoptimal protein sequence alignments. BMC Bioinformatics, 11, 146.
27. Sippl, M.J. (1993) Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet., 17, 355-362.
28. Taly, J.F. et al. (2008) Canmolecular dynamics simulations help in discriminating correct from erroneous protein 3D models? BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 6.
29. Thompson, J. et al. (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 4673-4690.
30. Thompson, J.D. et al. (2002) Multiple sequence alignment using ClustalW and ClustalX. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics, Chapter 2, Unit 2 3.
31. Thompson, J.D. et al. (2003) RASCAL: rapid scanning and correction of multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics, 19, 1155-1161.
32. Thompson, J.D. et al. (2005) BAliBASE 3.0: latest developments of the multiple sequence alignment benchmark. Proteins, 61, 127-136.
33. Wallace, I.M. et al. (2006) M-Coffee: combining multiple sequence alignment methods with T-Coffee. Nucleic Acids Res., 34, 1692-1699.
34. Wong, K.M. et al. (2008) Alignment uncertainty and genomic analysis. Science, 319, 473-476.
35. Wu, S. and Zhang, Y. (2008) MUSTER: improving protein sequence profile-profile alignments by using multiple sources of structure information. Proteins, 72, 547-556.
36. Yu, Y.K. et al. (2003) The compositional adjustment of amino acid substitution matrices. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 15688-15693.
37. Zhang, Y. and Skolnick, J. (2004) Automated structure prediction of weakly homologous proteins on a genomic scale. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 7594-7599.