Mass transfer simulation of ion separation by nanofiltration considering electrical and dielectrical effects

Desalination

Volumn 284, Issue , 2012, Pages 316-323

  Fadaei, Farzad ^a   Hoshyargar, Vahid ^a   Shirazian, Saeed ^a   Ashrafizadeh, Seyed Nezameddin ^a  

^a IRAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Dielectric effects; DSPM DE; Extended Nernst Planck; Modeling; Nanofiltration

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPED MODEL; DIELECTRIC EFFECTS; DONNAN EQUILIBRIUM; DONNAN EXCLUSION; DONNAN POTENTIAL; DSPM-DE; ELECTRICAL EFFECTS; EXTENDED NERNST-PLANCK; IMAGE FORCE; IMAGE-FORCE EFFECTS; INTERACTION ENERGIES; ION SEPARATION; MASS TRANSFER SIMULATION; MEMBRANE CHARACTERISTICS; MEMBRANE CHARGE; MEMBRANE REJECTION; MODEL FINDING; MONO- AND DIVALENT ION; MONOVALENT IONS; OPERATING CONDITION; PORE MODELS;

IONS; MODELS; NANOFILTRATION; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

DESALINATION; DIELECTRIC PROPERTY; ION EXCHANGE; MASS TRANSFER; MEMBRANE; MODELING; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 83255187207     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.09.018     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Shäfer A.I., Fane A.G., Waite T.D. Nanofiltration Principles and Applications 2005, Elsevier, Oxford, UK.
2. Wang X.L., Zhang C., Ouyang P. The possibility of separating saccharides from a NaCl solution by using nanofiltration in diafiltration mode. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 204:271-281.
3. Escoda A., Fievet P., Lakard S., Szymczyk A., Déon S. Influence of salts on the rejection of polyethyleneglycol by a NF organic membrane: pore swelling and salting-out effects. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 347:174-182.
4. Walha K., Amar R.B., Bourseau P., Jaouen P. Nanofiltration of concentrated and salted tuna cooking juices. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 2009, 87:331-335.
5. Luo J., Ding L., Chen X., Wan Y. Desalination of soy sauce by nanofiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 66:429-437.
6. Yu S., Gao C., Su H., Liu M. Nanofiltration used for desalination and concentration in dye production. Desalination 2001, 140:97-100.
7. Yunoki H., Nagata K., Kokubo K.I., Ito A., Watanabe A. Effects of the mixture ratio of amino acid and sodium chloride on the rejection of nanofiltration membranes under various operating conditions. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 2002, 35:76-82.
8. Chung C.V., Buu N.Q., Chau N.H. Influence of surface charge and solution pH on the performance characteristics of a nanofiltration membrane. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2005, 6:246-250.
9. Lu X., Wu H. Modeling of AC machine considering hysteresis and saturation. Diangong Jishu Xuebao Trans. China Electrotech. Soc. 2002, 17:1.
10. Hussain A.A., Nataraj S.K., Abashar M.E.E., Al-Mutaz I.S., Aminabhavi T.M. Prediction of physical properties of nanofiltration membranes using experiment and theoretical models. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 310:321-336.
11. Senapati S., Chandra A. Dielectric constant of water confined in a nanocavity. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105:5106-5109.
12. Yaroshchuk A.E. Dielectric exclusion of ions from membranes. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2000, 85:193-230.
13. Parsegian A. Energy of an ion crossing a low dielectric membrane: solutions to four relevant electrostatic problems. Nature 1969, 221:844-846.
14. Dresner L. Ion exclusion from neutral and slightly charged pores. Desalination 1974, 15:39-57.
15. Glueckauf E. The distribution of electrolytes between cellulose acetate membranes and aqueous solutions. Desalination 1976, 18:155-172.
16. Yaroshchuk A.E. Non-steric mechanism of nanofiltration: superposition of donnan and dielectric exclusion. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2001, 22-23:143-158.
17. Bandini S., Vezzani D. Nanofiltration modeling: the role of dielectric exclusion in membrane characterization. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2003, 58:3303-3326.
18. Szymczyk A., Fievet P. Investigating transport properties of nanofiltration membranes by means of a steric, electric and dielectric exclusion model. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 252:77-88.
19. Szymczyk A., Sbaï M., Fievet P., Vidonne A. Transport properties and electrokinetic characterization of an amphoteric nanofilter. Langmuir 2006, 22:3910-3919.
20. Vezzani D., Bandini S. Donnan equilibrium and dielectric exclusion for characterization of nanofiltration membranes. Desalination 2002, 149:477-483.
21. Hagmeyer G., Gimbel R. Modelling the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes for ternary ion mixtures and for single salts at different pH values. Desalination 1998, 117:247-256.
22. Bowen W.R., Welfoot J.S. Predictive modelling of nanofiltration: membrane specification and process optimization. Desalination 2002, 147:197-203.
23. Rashin A.A., Honig B. Reevaluation of the Born model of ion hydration. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89:5588-5593.
24. Déon S., Dutournié P., Bourseau P. Modeling nanofiltration with Nernst-Planck approach and polarization layer. AICHE J. 2007, 53:1952-1969.
25. Bowen W.R., Mohammad A.W. Characterization and prediction of nanofiltration membrane performance - a general assessment. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 1998, 76:885-893.
26. Bowen W.R., Mohammad A.W., Hilal N. Characterization of nanofiltration membranes for predictive purposes - use of salts, uncharged solutes and atomic force microscopy. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 126:91-105.
27. Bowen W.R., Mukhtar H. Characterization and prediction of separation performance of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 112:263-274.
28. Bowen W.R., Welfoot J.S. Modelling the performance of membrane nanofiltration - critical assessment and model development. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2002, 57:1121-1137.
29. Dechadilok P., Deen W.M. Hindrance factors for diffusion and convection in pores. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45:6953-6959.
30. Fievet P., Sbaï M., Szymczyk A. Analysis of the pressure-induced potential arising across selective multilayer membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 264:1-12.
31. Atkins P.W. Physical Chemistry 2005, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. 4th ed.