Quality of life in automated and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

Peritoneal Dialysis International

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 138-147

  Michels, Wieneke M ^a,b   van Dijk, Sandra ^c   Verduijn, Marion ^b   le Cessie, Saskia ^b,d   Boeschoten, Elisabeth W ^e   Dekker, Friedo W ^b   Krediet, Raymond T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b Departments of Clinical Epidemiology   (Netherlands)

^c Medical Psychology   (Netherlands)

^d LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e Hans Mak Institute   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Automated peritoneal dialysis; Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; KDQOL; Quality of life; SF 36

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL DIALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SHORT FORM 36; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; CHRONIC KIDNEY FAILURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; AUTOMATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KIDNEY FAILURE, CHRONIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERITONEAL DIALYSIS, CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 83255176918     PISSN: 08968608     EISSN: 17184304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3747/PDI.2010.00063     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bro S, Bjorner JB, Tofte-Jensen P, Klem S, Almtoft B, Danielsen H, et al. A prospective, randomized multicenter study comparing APD and CAPD treatment. Perit Dial Int 1999; 19:526-33.
2. de Fijter CW, Oe LP, Nauta JJ, van der Meulen J, Verbrugh HA, Verhoef J, et al. Clinical efficacy and morbidity associated with continuous cyclic compared with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120:264-71.
3. de Wit GA, Merkus MP, Krediet RT, de Charro FT. A comparison of quality of life of patients on automated and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2001; 21:306-12.
4. Diaz-Buxo JA, Lowrie EG, Lew NL, Zhang H, Lazarus JM. Quality-of-life evaluation using Short Form 36: comparison in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 35:293-300.
5. Iles-Smith H, Curwell J, Gokal R. Comparative evaluation of CAPD and PD-plus effectiveness. EDTNA ERCA J 1999; 25:27-9.
6. Sunder S, Kalra OP, Nashine S, Waghmare V, Ruchi R. Comparative study of adequacy of dialysis and health-related quality of life in patients on CAPD and APD. Perit Dial Int 2008; 28: 542-4.
7. European Renal Association (ERA)-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EDTA) Registry. ERA-EDTA Registry 2004 Annual Report. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Academic Medical Center, Department of Medical Informatics; 2006.
8. European Renal Association (ERA)-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EDTA) Registry. ERA-EDTA Registry 2007 Annual Report. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Academic Medical Center, Department of Medical Informatics; 2009.
9. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Postgrad Med 2002; 48:206-8.
10. Davies SJ, Russell L, Bryan J, Phillips L, Russell GI. Comorbidity, urea kinetics, and appetite in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients: their interrelationship and prediction of survival. Am J Kidney Dis 1995; 26:353-61.
11. van Dijk PC, Jager KJ, de Charro F, Collart F, Cornet R, Dekker FW, et al. Renal replacement therapy in Europe: the results of a collaborative effort by the ERA-EDTA registry and six national or regional registries. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001; 16:1120-9.
12. Visser R, Dekker FW, Boeschoten EW, Stevens P, Krediet RT. Reliability of the 7-point Subjective Global Assessment scale in assessing nutritional status of dialysis patients. Adv Perit Dial 1999; 15:222-5.
13. Aaronson NK, Muller M, Cohen PD, Essink-Bot ML, Fekkes M, Sanderman R, et al. Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51:1055-68.
14. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30:473-83.
15. Lopes AA, Bragg J, Young E, Goodkin D, Mapes D, Combe C, et al. Depression as a predictor of mortality and hospitalization among hemodialysis patients in the United States and Europe. Kidney Int 2002; 62:199-207.
16. Hays RD, Kallich JD, Mapes DL, Coons SJ, Carter WB. Development of the kidney disease quality of life (KDQOL) instrument. Qual Life Res 1994; 3:329-38.
17. Korevaar JC, Merkus MP, Jansen MA, Dekker FW, Boeschoten EW, Krediet RT. Validation of the KDQOL-SF: a dialysis-targeted health measure. Qual Life Res 2002; 11:437-47.
18. Rabindranath KS, Adams J, Ali TZ, MacLeod AM, Vale L, Cody J, et al. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis versus automated peritoneal dialysis for end-stage renal disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;:CD006515.
19. Tang SC, Lam B, Ku PP, Leung WS, Chu CM, Ho YW, et al. Alleviation of sleep apnea in patients with chronic renal failure by nocturnal cycler-assisted peritoneal dialysis compared with conventional continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 17:2607-16.
20. Badve SV, Hawley CM, McDonald SP, Mudge DW, Rosman JB, Brown FG, et al. Automated and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis have similar outcomes. Kidney Int 2008; 73:480-8.
21. Mehrotra R, Chiu YW, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Vonesh E. The outcomes of continuous ambulatory and automated peritoneal dialysis are similar. Kidney Int 2009; 76:97-107.
22. Michels WM, Verduijn M, Boeschoten EW, Dekker FW, Krediet RT. Similar survival on automated peritoneal dialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in a large prospective cohort. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 4:943-9.