Recombinant protein quality evaluation: Proposal for a minimal information standard

Standards in Genomic Sciences

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 195-197

  Buckle, Ashley M ^a   Bate, Mark A ^a   Androulakis, Steve ^a   Cinquanta, Mario ^b   Basquin, Jerome ^c   Bonneau, Fabien ^c   Chatterjee, Deb K ^d   Cittaro, Davide ^b   Gräslund, Susanne ^e   Gruszka, Alicja ^f   Page, Rebecca ^g   Suppmann, Sabine ^c   Wheeler, Jun X ^h   Agostini, Deborah ^b   Taussig, Mike ⁱ   Taylor, Chris F ^j   Bottomley, Stephen P ^a   Villaverde, Antonio ^k   de Marco, Ario ^l  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b Monash University ^*  (Italy)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

^d SAIC FREDERICK INC   (United States)

^e KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^f EUROPEAN INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY   (Italy)

^g BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STANDARDS AND CONTROL   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ Babraham Bioscience Technologies Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^j EUROPEAN BIOINFORMATICS INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^k UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^l UNIVERSITY OF NOVA GORICA   (Slovenia)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 83255164171     PISSN: 19443277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4056/sigs.1834511     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. de Marco A. Minimal Information: an urgent need to assess the functional reliability of recombinant proteins used in biological experiments. Microb Cell Fact 2008; 7:20. PubMed doi:10.1186/1475-2859-7-20
2. de Marco A, Stevastsyanovich YR, Cole JA. Minimal information for protein functional evaluation (MIPFE) workshop. New Biotechnol 2009; 25:170. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2008.12.006
3. Orchard S, Taylor CF. Debunking minimum information myths: one hat need not fit all. New Biotechnol 2009; 25:171-172. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2008.12.001
4. Sherman DJ. Minimum information requirements: neither bandits in the Attic nor bats in the belfry. New Biotechnol 2009; 25:173-174. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2008.12.002
5. Taylor CF. Standards for reporting bioscience data: a forward look. Drug Discov Today 2007; 12:527-533. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2007.05.006
6. de Marco A. Reagent validation: an underestimated issue in lab practis. J Mol Recognit 2011; 24:136. PubMed doi:10.1002/jmr.1060
7. Burgoon LD. The need for standards, not guidelines, in biological data reporting and sharing. Nat Biotechnol 2006; 24:1369-1373. PubMed doi:10.1038/nbt1106-1369
8. Standardizing data. Nat Cell Biol 2008; 10:1123-1124. PubMed doi:10.1038/ncb1008-1123
9. Ball CA, Sherlock G, Parkinson H, Rocca-Sera P, Brooksbank C, Causton HC, Cavalieri D, Gaasterland T, Hingamp P, Holstege F, et al. The underlying principles of scientific publication. Bioinformatics 2002; 18:1409. PubMed doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.11.1409
10. Ball CA, Sherlock G, Brazma A. Funding high-throughput data sharing. Nat Biotechnol 2004; 22:1179-1183. PubMed doi:10.1038/nbt0904-1179
11. Philo JS. Is any measurement method optimal for all aggregate sizes and types? AAPS J 2006; 8:E564-E571. PubMed doi:10.1208/aapsj080365
12. Nominé Y, Ristriani T, Laurent C, Lefevre JF, Weiss E, Travé G. A strategy for optimizing the monodispersity of fusion proteins: application to purification of recombinant HPV E6 oncoprotein. Protein Eng 2001; 14:297-305. PubMed doi:10.1093/protein/14.4.297
13. Schrödel A, de Marco A. Identification and characterization of recombinant protein aggregates. BMC Biochem 2005; 6:10. PubMed doi:10.1186/1471-2091-6-10
14. Martínez-Alonso M, Gonzalez-Montalban N, Garcia-Fruitos E, Villaverde A. The functional quality of soluble recombinant polypeptides produced in Escherichia coli is defined by a wide conformational spectrum. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008; 74:7431-7433. PubMed doi:10.1128/AEM.01446-08
15. Ceol A, Chatr-Aryamontri A, Licata L, Cesareni G. Linking entries in protein interaction database to structured text: the FEBS Letters experiment. FEBS Lett 2008; 582:1171-1177. PubMed doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2008.02.071
16. Minimal Information for Protein Functionality Evaluation. http:// www.mipfe.org
17. Credit where credit is overdue. Nat Biotechnol 2009; 27:579. PubMed doi:10.1038/nbt0709-579
18. Howe D, Costanzo M, Fey P, Gojobori T, Hannick L, Hide W, Hill DP, Kania R, Schaeffer M, St Pierre S, et al. Big data: The future of biocuration. Nature 2008; 455:47-50. PubMed doi:10.1038/455047a
19. Cusick ME, Yu H, Smolyar A, Venkatesan K, Carvunis AR, Simonis N, Rual JF, Borick H, Braun P, Dreze M, et al. Literature-curated protein interaction datasets. Nat Methods 2009; 6:39-46. PubMed doi:10.1038/nmeth.1284
20. Taylor CF, Paton NW, Lilley KS, Binz PA, Julian RK, Jr., Jones AR, Zhu W, Apweiler R, Aebersold R, Deutsch EW, et al. The minimum information about a proteomics experiment (MIAPE). Nat Biotechnol 2007; 25:887-893. PubMed doi:10.1038/nbt1329
21. Taylor CF, Field D, Sansone SA, Aerts J, Apweiler R, Ashburner M, Ball CA, Binz PA, Bogue M, Booth T, et al. Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26:889-896. PubMed doi:10.1038/nbt.1411
22. Kettner C, Field D, Sansone SA, Taylor C, Aerts J, Binns N, Blake A, Britten CM, de Marco A, Fostel J, et al. Meeting report from the second "Minimum Information about a Biological or Biomedical Investigation" (MIBBI) workshop. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 3:259-266. PubMed doi:10.4056/sigs.147362