To deliberate or not to deliberate: Interactions between age, task characteristics, and cognitive activity on decision making

Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 29-40

  Hess, Thomas M ^a   Queen, Tara L ^a   Patterson, Taryn R ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aging; Alignability; Choice supportive memory; Decision making

Indexed keywords

EID: 83155184705     PISSN: 08943257     EISSN: 10990771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bdm.711     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. ACNielsen (2005). Winning strategies for your most important shoppers. Retrieved 25 August 2008, from
2. Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 938-956.
3. Dijksterhuis, A. (2004). Think different: The merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 586-589.
4. Dijksterhuis, A., & Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 95-109.
5. Dijksterhuis, A., & van Olden, Z. (2006). On the benefits of thinking unconsciously: Unconscious thought can increase post-choice satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 627-631.
6. Finucane, M. L., Mertz, C. k., Slovic, P., & Schmidt, E. S. (2005). Task complexity and older adults' decision making competence. Psychology and Aging, 20, 71-84.
7. Finucane, M. L., Slovic, P., Hibbard, J. H., Peters, E., Mertz, C. K., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). Aging and decision-making competence: An analysis of comprehension and consistency skills in older versus younger adults considering health-plan options. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 141-164.
8. Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structural mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52, 45-56.
9. Gourville, J. T., & Soman, D. (2005). Overchoice and assortment type: When and why variety backfires. Marketing Science, 24, 382-395.
10. Heaton, R. K., & Staff, P. A. R. (2000). Wisconsin card sorting test® computer version 4 research edition. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
11. Herrmann, A., Heitmann, M., Morgan, R., Henneberg, S. C., & Landwehr, J. (2009). Consumer decision making and variety of offerings: The effect of attribute alignability. Psychology & Marketing, 26, 333-358.
12. Hess, T. M., Pullen, S. M., & McGee, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of prototype-based information about social groups in adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 11, 179-190.
13. Lassiter, G. D., Lindberg, M. J., González-Vallejo, C., Bellezza, F. S., & Phillips, N. D. (2009). The deliberation-without attention effect: Evidence for an artifactual interpretation. Psychological Science, 20, 671-675.
14. Markman, A. B. (1996). Structural alignment in similarity and difference judgements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 227-230.
15. Markman, A. B., & Medin, D. L. (1995). Similarity and alignment in choice. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 63, 117-130.
16. Mata, R., Schooler, L., & Rieskamp, J. (2007). The aging decision maker: Cognitive aging and the adaptive selection of decision strategies. Psychology and Aging, 22, 796-810.
17. Mather, M., & Johnson, M. K. (2000). Choice-supportive source monitoring: Do our decisions seem better to us as we age? Psychology and Aging, 15, 596-606.
18. Mather, M., Knight, M., & McCaffrey, M. (2005). The allure of the alignable: Younger and older adults' false memories of choice features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 38-51.
19. Meyer, B. J. F., Talbot, A. P., & Ranalli, C. (2007). Why older adults make more immediate treatment decisions about cancer than younger adults. Psychology and Aging, 22, 505-524.
20. Newell, B. R., Wong, K. W., Cheung, J. C. H., & Rakow, T. (2009). Think, blink, or sleep on it? The impact of modes of thought on complex decision making. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 707-732.
21. Payne, J. W., Samper, A., Bettman, J. R., & Luce, M. F. (2008). Boundary conditions on unconscious thought in complex decision making. Psychological Science, 19, 1118-1123.
22. Peters, E., Hess, T. M., Auman, C., & Västfjäll, D. (2007). Adult age differences in dual information processes and their influence on judgments and decisions: A review. Perspectives on PsychologicalScience, 2, 1-23.
23. Power, J. D., & Associates. (2007). Camden Property Trust, Irvine Community Apartment Communities, Legacy Partners, and ZOM Residential Services rank highest in residential satisfaction with apartment management companies, 27 September. Retrieved 25 August 2008, from
24. Pratt, M. W., Diessner, R., Pratt, A., Hunsberger, B., & Pancer, S. M. (1996). Moral and social reasoning and perspective taking in later life: A longitudinal study. Psychology and Aging, 11, 66-73.
25. Queen, T. L., & Hess, T. M. (in press). Age differences in the effects of conscious and unconscious thought in decision-making. Psychology and Aging.
26. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intra-class correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.
27. Strough, J., Mehta, C. M., McFall, J. P., & Schuller, K. L. (2008). Are older adults less subject to the sunk-costs fallacy than younger adults? Psychological Science, 19, 650-652.
28. Tentori, K., Osherson, D., Hasher, L., & May, C. (2001). Wisdom and aging: Irrational preferences in college students but not older adults. Cognition, 81, B87-B96.
29. Thorsteinson, T. J., & Withrow, S. (2009). Does unconscious thought outperform conscious thought on complex decisions? A further examination. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 235-247.
30. Ware, J. E. Jr. (1993). SF-36 health survey. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.
31. Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler adult intelligence scale-third edition. New York: Psychological Corporation.
32. Wilson, T. D., & Schooler, J. W. (1991). Thinking too much: Introspection can reduce the quality of preferences and decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 181-192.
33. Zhang, S., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (1999). Choice-process satisfaction: The influence of attribute alignability and option limitation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77, 192-214.
34. Zhang, S., & Markman, A. B. (2001). Processing product unique features: Alignability and involvement in preference construction. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11, 13-27.