The efficiency of using non-culpable crash-claim involvements from insurance data as a means of estimating travel exposure for road user sub-groups

Journal of Safety Research

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 129-136

  Cooper, Peter J ^a   Meckle, Wayne ^a   Andersen, Linda ^a  

^a Insurance Corporation of British Columbia   (Canada)

Author keywords

Crash involvement; Culpability; Induced exposure; Responsibility; Travel

Indexed keywords

CRASHWORTHINESS; HIGHWAY ENGINEERING; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; TRAFFIC CONTROL; VEHICLES;

CRASH INVOLVEMENT; CULPABILITY; INDUCED EXPOSURE; RESPONSIBILITY; TRAVEL;

ACCIDENTS;

EID: 83055180429     PISSN: 00224375     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2010.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ardenkani, S., Hauer, E., & Jamei, B. (2001). Traffic impact models. In Traffic Flow Theory: A State-of-the Art Report, 7-1 (pp. 7-24). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
2. Brown, I. D. (1982). Exposure and experience are a confounded nuisance in research on driver behavior. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 14, 345-352. (Pubitemid 13226043)
3. Carr, B. R. (1969). A statistical analysis of rural Ontario traffic accidents using induced exposure. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1, 343-357.
4. Cerrelli, E. C. (1973). Driver exposure: the indirect approach for obtaining relative measures. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 5, 147-156.
5. Chandraratna, S., & Stamatiadis, N. (2009). Quasi-induced exposure method: evaluation of not-at-fault assumption. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41, 308-313.
6. Chapman, R. (1973). The concept ofexposure. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 5, 95-110.
7. Cuthbert, J. R. (1994). An extension of the induced exposure method of estimating driver risk. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 157, 177-190.
8. Davis, G. A., & Gao, Y. (1993). Statistical methods to support induced exposure analyses of traffic accident data. Transportation Research record, 1401 (pp. 43-49). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
9. DeYoung, D. J., Peck, R. C., & Helander, C. J. (1997). Estimating the exposure and fatal crash rates of suspended/revoked and unlicensed drivers in California. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 29, 17-23. (Pubitemid 127416309)
10. Haight, F. A. (1973). Induced exposure. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 5, 111-126.
11. Haque, M. M., Chin, H. C., & Huang, H. (2008). Examining exposure of motorcycles at signalized intersections. Transportation Research Record, 2048 (pp. 60-65). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
12. Hauer, E. (1982). Traffic conflicts and exposure. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 14, 359-364. (Pubitemid 13226045)
13. Huang, H., & Chin, H. C. (2009). Disaggregate propensity study onred light running crashes using quasi-induced exposure method. Journal of Transportation Engineering ASCE, 135, 104-111.
14. Janke, M. K. (1991). Accidents, mileage, and the exaggeration of risk. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 23, 183-188.
15. Joksch, H. C. (1973). A pilot study of observed and induced exposure to traffic accidents. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 5, 127-136.
16. Keall, M., & Newstead, S. (2009). Selection of comparison crash types for quasi-induced exposure risk estimation. Traffic Injury Prevention, 10, 23-29.
17. Kirk, A., & Stamatiadis, N. (2001). Evaluation of the quasi-induced exposure. Report prepared for the US DOT Transportation Center by the University of Kentucky.
18. Koornstra, M. J. (1973). Empirical results on the exposure-proneness model. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 5, 175-189.
19. Li, L., & Kim, K. (2000). Estimating driver crash risks based on the extended Bradley-Terry model: an induced exposure method. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 163, 227-240.
20. Lyles, R. W., Stamatiadis, P., & Lighthizer, D. R. (1991). Quasi-induced exposure revisited. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 23, 275-285.
21. Redondo-Calderon, J. L., Luna-del-Castillo, J. deD., Jimenez-Moleon, J. J., Garcia-Martin, M., Lardelli-Claret, P., & Galvez-Vargas, R. (2001). Application of the Induced exposure method to compare risks of traffic crashes among different types of drivers under different environmental conditions. American Journal of Epidemiology, 153, 882-890.
22. Risk, A., & Shaoul, J. E. (1982). Exposure to risk and the risk of exposure. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 14, 353-357. (Pubitemid 13226044)
23. Stamatiadis, N., & Deacon, J. A. (1997). Quasi-induced exposure: methodology and insight. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 29, 37-52. (Pubitemid 127416312)
24. Terhune, K. W. (1983). An evaluation of responsibility analysis for assessing alcohol and drug crash effects. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 15(3), 237-246.
25. Voas, R. B., Tippetts, A. S., Romana, E., Fisher, D. A., & Kelley-Baker, T. (2007). Alcohol involvement in fatal crashes under three crash exposure measures. Traffic Injury Prevention, 8, 107-114.
26. af Wahlberg, A. E. (2009). Hourly changes in accident risk for bus drivers. Journal of Risk Research, 12(2), 187-197.
27. af Wahlberg, A. E., & Dorn, L. (2007). Culpable versus non-culpable traffic accidents; what is wrong with this picture? Journal of Safety Research, 38, 453-459. (Pubitemid 47404563)
28. Yan, X., Radwan, E., & Birriel, E. (2005). Analysis of red light running crashes based on quasi-induced exposure and multiple logistic regression method. Transportation Research Record, 1908 (pp. 70-79). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board. (Pubitemid 43240311)