Integrating knowledge for subjectivity sense labeling

NAACL HLT 2009 - Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 10-18

  Gyamfi, Yaw ^a   Wiebe, Janyce ^a   Mihalcea, Rada ^b   Akkaya, Cem ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOMAIN INFORMATIONS; HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURES; LEXICAL RESOURCES; SEMANTICALLY-RELATED WORDS; WORD SENSE; WORDNET;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 83055179875     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1620754.1620757     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Alina Andreevskaia and Sabine Bergler. 2006a. Mining wordnet for a fuzzy sentiment: Sentiment tag extraction from wordnet glosses. In Proceedings of the 11rd Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
2. Alina Andreevskaia and Sabine Bergler. 2006b. Sentiment tag extraction from wordnet glosses. In Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.
3. Rebecca Bruce and Janyce Wiebe. 1999. Recognizing subjectivity: A case study of manual tagging. Natural Language Engineering, 5(2):187-205.
4. S. Cerini, V. Campagnoni, A. Demontis, M. Formentelli, and C. Gandini. 2007. Micro-wnop: A gold standard for the evaluation of automatically compiled lexical resources for opinion mining. In Language resources and linguistic theory: Typology, second language acquisition, English linguistics. Milano.
5. Andrea Esuli and Fabrizio Sebastiani. 2006a. Determining term subjectivity and term orientation for opinion mining. In 11th Meeting of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
6. Andrea Esuli and Fabrizio Sebastiani. 2006b. Senti-WordNet: A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Genova, IT.
7. Andrea Esuli and Fabrizio Sebastiani. 2007. PageRanking wordnet synsets: An application to opinion mining. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 424-431, Prague, Czech Republic, June.
8. A. Gliozzo, C. Strapparava, E. d'Avanzo, and B. Magnini. 2005. Automatic acquisition of domain specific lexicons. Tech. report, IRST, Italy.
9. T. Joachims. 1999. Making large-scale SVM learning practical. In B. Scholkopf, C. Burgess, and A. Smola, editors, Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning, Cambridge, MA. MIT-Press.
10. Soo-Min Kim and Eduard Hovy. 2004. Determining the sentiment of opinions. In Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 1267-1373, Geneva, Switzerland.
11. Soo-Min Kim and Eduard Hovy. 2006. Identifying and analyzing judgment opinions. In Proceedings of Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 200-207, New York.
12. M.E. Lesk. 1986. Automatic sense disambiguation using machine readable dictionaries: How to tell a pine cone from an ice cream cone. In Proceedings of the SIGDOC Conference 1986, Toronto, June.
13. Bo Pang and Lillian Lee. 2004. A sentimental education: Sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 271-278, Barcelona, ES. Association for Computational Linguistics.
14. Philip Resnik. 1995. Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. In Proc. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
15. E. Riloff and J. Wiebe. 2003. Learning extraction patterns for subjective expressions. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 105-112.
16. Fangzhong Su and Katja Markert. 2008. From word to sense: a case study of subjectivity recognition. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Manchester.
17. M. Taboada, C. Anthony, and K. Voll. 2006. Methods for creating semantic orientation databases. In Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.
18. Hiroya Takamura, Takashi Inui, and Manabu Okumura. 2006. Latent variable models for semantic orientations of phrases. In Proceedings of the 11th Meeting of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Trento, Italy.
19. P. Turney. 2002. Thumbs up or thumbs down? semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 417-424, Philadelphia.
20. Alessandro Valitutti, Carlo Strapparava, and Oliviero Stock. 2004. Developing affective lexical resources. PsychNology Journal, 2(1):61-83.
21. J. Wiebe and R. Mihalcea. 2006. Word sense and subjectivity. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Sydney, Australia.
22. Janyce Wiebe and Ellen Riloff. 2005. Creating subjective and objective sentence classifiers from unan-notated texts. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics, pages 486-497, Mexico City, Mexico. (Pubitemid 41251884)
23. Theresa Wilson, Janyce Wiebe, and Paul Hoffmann. 2005. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technologies Conference/Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 347-354, Vancouver, Canada.
24. Hong Yu and Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou. 2003. Towards answering opinion questions: Separating facts from opinions and identifying the polarity of opinion sentences. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 129-136, Sapporo, Japan.