Optimal synthesis of chromatographic trains for downstream protein processing

Biotechnology Progress

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1653-1660

  Polykarpou, Eleftheria M ^a   Dalby, Paul A ^a   Papageorgiou, Lazaros G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Downstream processing; Mathematical programming; Protein purification

Indexed keywords

BIOPROCESSING; COST DRIVERS; DOWNSTREAM-PROCESSING; MATHEMATICAL FRAMEWORKS; MIXED INTEGER; MODEL RESULTS; MULTI-COMPONENT SYSTEMS; OPTIMAL SYNTHESIS; OPTIMISATIONS; PRODUCT FRACTION; PROTEIN MIXTURES; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; RETENTION TIME; SYSTEMATIC METHOD; THERAPEUTIC PROTEIN;

BIOSYNTHESIS; CHROMATOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; MATHEMATICAL TECHNIQUES; PROTEINS;

PURIFICATION;

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHROMATOGRAPHY; INSTRUMENTATION; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; CHROMATOGRAPHY; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PROTEINS;

EID: 82955249265     PISSN: 87567938     EISSN: 15206033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.670     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ngiam SH, Bracewell DG, Zhou Y, Titchener-Hooker NJ. Quantifying process tradeoffs in the operation of chromatographic sequences. Biotechnol Prog. 2003; 19: 1315-1322.
2. Larsson G, Jrgensen SB, Pons MN, Sonnleitner B, Tijsterman A, Titchener-Hooker NJ. Minireview: biochemical engineering science. J Biotechnol. 1997; 59: 3-9.
3. Bonnerjea J, Oh S, Hoare M, Dunnill P. Protein purification: the right step at the right time. Nat Biotechnol. 1986; 4: 954-958.
4. Salgado JC, Rapaport I, Asenjo JA. Prediciting the behaviour of proteins in hydrophobic interaction chromatography 2. Using a statistical description of their surface amino acid distribution. J Chromatogr A. 2006; 1107: 120-129.
5. Nishida N, Stephanopoulos G, Westerberg AW. A review of process synthesis. AIChE J. 1981; 27: 321-351.
6. Asenjo JA, Herrera L, Byrne B. Development of an expert system for selection and synthesis of protein purification processes. J Biotechnol. 1989; 11: 275-298.
7. Wheelwright SM. The design of downstream processes for large-scale protein purification. J Biotechnol. 1989; 11: 89-102.
8. Ostlund C. Large-scale purification of monoclonal antibodies. Trends Biotechnol. 1986; 4: 288-293.
9. Lienqueo ME. Desarollo de un sistema experto para la selection racional de processos de purification de proteinas: optimizacion de criterios se seleccion de sequenciase. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad De Chile Facultad de Ciencias Fisicas y matematicas departamento de Ingeniera Quimica. 1999.
10. Lienqueo ME, Leser EW, Asenjo JA. An expert system for the selection and synthesis of multi-step protein separation processes. Comput Chem Eng. 1996; 20: 189-194.
11. Vasquez-Alvarez E, Lienqueo ME, Pinto JM. Optimal Synthesis of Protein Purification Processes. Biotechnol Prog. 2001; 17: 685-696.
12. Vasquez-Alvarez E, Pinto JM. Efficient MILP formulation for the optimal synthesis of chromatographic protein purification processes. J Biotechnol. 2004; 110: 295-311.
13. Simeonidis E, Pinto JM, Lienqueo ME, Tsoka S, Papageorgiou LG. MINLP Models for the synthesis of optimal peptide tags and downstream protein processing. Biotechnol Prog. 2005; 21: 875-884.
14. Lienqueo ME, Salgado JC, Giaverini O, Asenjo JA. Computer-aided design to select optimal polypeptide tags to assist the purification of recombinant proteins. Sep Purif Technol. 2009; 65: 86-94.
15. Natali JM, Pinto JM, Papageorgiou LG. Efficient MILP formulations for the simultaneous optimal peptide tag design and downstream processing synthesis. AIChE J. 2009; 55: 2303-2317.
16. Nfor BK, Ahamed T, van Dedem GWK, van der Wielen LAM, van de Sandt EJAX, Eppink MHM, Ottens M. Design strategies for integrated protein purification processes: challenges, progress and outlook. J Chem Technol Biotech. 2008; 83: 124-132.
17. Nfor BK, Verhaert PDEM, van der Wielen LAM, Hubbuch J, Ottens M. Rational and systematic protein purification process develpment: the next generation. Trends Biotechnol. 2009; 27: 673-679.
18. Vasquez-Alvarez E, Pinto JM. Mixed integer optimization models for the Synthesis of Protein Purification Processes with product loss. In:European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering-12; Computer-Aided Process Engineering, Krakow, Poland; 2002; Vol. 10, pp 373-378.
19. Vasquez-Alvarez E, Pinto JM. A mixed integer linear programming model for the optimal synthesis of protein purification processes with product loss. Chem Biochem Eng Q. 2003; 17: 77-84.
20. Elena Lienqueo M, Mahn A, Asenjo JA. Mathematical correlations for predicting protein retention times in hydrophobic interaction chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2002; 978: 71-79.
21. Brooke A, Kendrick D, Meeraus A, Raman GAMS-A User's Guide. Washington, DC: GAMS Development Corporation; 2008.