Cross-disciplinary practice in engineering contexts - A developmental phenomenographical perspective

Learning in the Disciplines: ICLS 2010 Conference Proceedings - 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 1, Issue , 2010, Pages 1166-1173

  Adams, Robin ^a   Forin, Tiago ^a   Srinivasan, Saranya ^a   Mann, Llewellyn ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SWINBURNE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CROSS-DISCIPLINARY; WAYS OF THINKING;

EID: 82955210444     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Adams, R.S., Mann, L., Jordan, S., and Daly, S. (2009a). "Exploring the boundaries: language, roles, and structures in cross-disciplinary design teams." In J. McDonnell and P. Lloyd (eds), About Designing: Analysing Design Meetings, 2009, Chapter 16. London: Taylor and Francis Group.
2. Adams, R.S., Forin, T., Mann, L. and Daly, S (2009b). "Cross-disciplinary practice in engineering contexts." Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED), Palo Alto, August.
3. Bowden, J.A. & Green, P. (2005). Doing Developmental Phenomenography. Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
4. Bromme, R. (2000). "Beyond One's Own Perspective: The Psychology of Cognitive Interdisciplinarity." In P. Weingart & N. Stehr (Eds), Practising Interdisciplinary, pp. 115-133. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
5. Daly, S., Mann, L., and Adams, R. (2008). "A new direction for engineering education research: Unique phenomenographic results that impact big picture understandings." In Proceedings of the 2008 AaaE Conference, Yeppoon, Australia.
6. Dall'Alba, G. (2009). Learning to be Professionals. Innovation and Change in Professional Development, Volume 4. Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
7. Dall'Alba, G. and J. Sandberg (2006). "Unveiling Professional Development: A Critical Review of Stage Models." Review of Educational Research, 76(3): 383 - 412.
8. Galison, P. (1997). Image and Logic, 1997. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
9. Klein, J. T. (1996). Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, disciplinarities, and interdisciplinarities. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
10. Klein, J. T. (2004). "Prospects for transdisciplinarity". Futures, 36: 515-526.
11. Lattuca, L. (2001). Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
12. Mann, L. M. W., D. Radcliffe, and Dall'Alba, G. (2007). "Using Phenomenography to Investigate Different Ways of Experiencing Sustainable Design." In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Hawaii.
13. Marton, F. and Booth, S. (1997). Learning and Awareness. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. National Academy of Engineering (NAE) (2004). Engineering of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington DC: National Academy of Engineering, National Academy Press.
15. Nersessian, N. J. (2006). "The Cognitive-Cultural Systems of the Research Laboratory." Organizational Studies, 27(1): 125-145.
16. Newstetter, W., E. Kurz-Milcke, et al. (2004). "Agentive Learning in Engineering Research Labs." Proceedings of the annual Frontiers in Education Conference.
17. Sfard, A. and A. Prusak (2005). "Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity." Educational Researcher, 34(4): 14-22.