Exploring the boundaries: Language, roles and structures in cross-disciplinary design teams

About: Designing - Analysing Design Meetings

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 339-358

  Adams, Robin ^a   Mann, Llewellyn ^a   Jordan, Shawn ^a   Daly, Shanna ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952823542     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Bordogna, J., Fromm, E. and Ernst, E.W. (1993) Engineering Education: Innovation through Integration, Journal of Engineering Education, 82 (1), pp. 3-8.
2. Bucciarelli, L.L. (1996) Designing Engineers, MIT Press.
3. Jonassen, D.H., Strobel, J. and Lee, C.B. (2006) Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators, Journal of Engineering Education, 95, pp. 139-151.
4. NAE (2004) The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century, National Academy Press, Washington DC.
5. Bromme, R. (2000) Beyond One's Own Perspective: The Psychology of Cognitive Interdisciplinarity, in Weingart, P. and Stehr, N. (eds) Practising Interdisciplinarity, University of Toronto Press, pp. 115-133.
6. Klein, J.T. (1996) Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities, University Press of Virginia.
7. Lattuca, L.R. (2001) Creating Interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary Research and Teaching Among College and University Faculty, Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville.
8. Petre, M. (2004) How Expert Engineering Teams Use Disciplines of Innovation, Design Studies 25, pp. 477-493.
9. Aligica, P.D. (2004) The Challenge of the Future and the Institutionalization of Interdisciplinarity: Notes on Herman Kahn's Legacy, Futures, 36, pp. 67-83.
10. Balsiger, P.W. (2004) Supradisciplinary Research Practices: History, Objectives and Rationale, Futures, 36, pp. 407-421.
11. Klein, J.T. (2004) Prospects for Transdisciplinarity, Futures 36, pp. 515-526.
12. Gieryn, T. (1983) Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists, American Sociological Review 48, pp. 781-795.
13. Bucciarelli (1996) op. cit.
14. Bowker, G.C. and Star, S.L. (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences, MIT Press.
15. Nersessian, N.J. (2006) The Cognitive-Cultural Systems of the Research Laboratory, Organizational Studies, 27,pp. 125-145.
16. Star, S.L. and Griesemer, J.R. (1999) Institutional Ecology, 'Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, in Biagioli, M. (ed) The Science Studies Reader, Routledge.
17. Galison, P. (1997) Image and Logic, The University of Chicago Press.
18. Klein (1996), op. cit.
19. Newstetter, W. and Kurz-Milcke, E. (2004) Agentive Learning in Engineering Research Labs in Frontiers in Education, Savanah, Georgia.
20. Visser, W. (2006) The Cognitive Artifacts of Designing, Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Dorst, K. and Cross, N. (2001) Creativity in the Design Process: Co-Evolution of Problem-Solution, Design Studies, 22, pp. 425-437.
22. Adams, R.S., Turns, J. and Atman, C.J. (2003) Educating Effective Engineering Designers: The Role of Reflective Practice, Design Studies, 24, pp. 275-294.
23. Petre (2004), op. cit.
24. Lloyd, P. (2000) Storytelling and the Development of Discourse in the Engineering Design Process, Design Studies 21, pp. 357-373.
25. Goel, V. and Pirolli, P. (1992) The Structure of Design Problem Spaces, Cognitive Science 16, pp. 395-429.
26. Jonassen, D.H. (2000) Toward a Design Theory of Problem Solving, Educational Technology Research and Development, 48, pp. 63-85.
27. McDonnell, J. (Chapter 14) Collaborative Negotiation in Design: A Study of Design Conversations between Architect and Building Users.
28. Matthews, B. (Chapter 2) Intersections of Brainstorming Rules and Social Order.
29. Atman, C., Borgford-Parnell, J., Deibel, K., Kang, A., Ng, W.H., Kilgore, D., and Turns, J. (Chapter 22) Matters of Context in Design.
30. Luck, R. (Chapter 13) 'Does this compromise your design?' Socially Producing a Design Concept in Talk-in-Interaction.
31. Stacey, M., Eckert, C. and Earl, C (Chapter 20) From Ronchamp by Sledge: On the Pragmatics of Object References.
32. Ball, L. and Christensen, B. (Chapter 8) Analogical Reasoning and Mental Simulation in Design: Two Strategies Linked to Uncertainty Resolution.
33. Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine, New York.
34. Reymen, I., Dorst, K. and Smulders, F. (Chapter 4) Coevolution in Design Practice.
35. Visser, W. (Chapter 15) The Function of Gesture in an Architectural Design Meeting.
36. Stempfle, J. and P. Badke-Schaub (2002) Thinking in Design Teams - An Analysis of Team Communication, Design Studies 23, pp. 473-496.
37. Redström, J. (2006) Towards User Design? On the Shift from Object to User as the Subject of Design, Design Studies 27, pp. 123-139.
38. Kelley, T. and Littman, J. (2005) The Ten Faces of Innovation: IDEO's Strategies for Defeating the Devil's Advocate and Driving Creativity Throughout Your Organization, Doubleday.
39. Lloyd (2000), op. cit.
40. Lloyd, P. (Chapter 5) Ethical Imagination and Design
41. Goldschmidt, G. and Eshel, D. (Chapter 18) Behind the Scenes of the Design Theatre: Actors, Roles and the Dynamics of Communication.
42. Bucciarelli (1996), op. cit.
43. Dorst and Cross (2001), op. cit.
44. Adams et al. (2003), op. cit.