Biofuels: The risks and dangers of introducing invasive species

Biofuels

Volumn 1, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 785-796

  Chimera, Charles G ^a   Buddenhagen, Christopher E ^b   Clifford, Patti M ^a,c  

^a Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit   (United States)

^b SWCA Environmental Consultants   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLIMATIC CONDITIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS; GLOBAL ENERGY; INVASIVE SPECIES; TROPICAL CLIMATES;

CROPS; CULTIVATION;

BIOFUELS;

EID: 82955164087     PISSN: 17597269     EISSN: 17597277     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4155/bfs.10.47     Document Type: Review

References (91)

1. Scharlemann JPW, Laurance WF. How green are biofuels? Science. 318(5858), 52-53 (2008).Concise paper that calls into question some of the assertions regarding the environmental benefits of biofuel crop cultivation, and summarizes many of the associated ecological and social costs.
2. Field CB, Campbell JE, Lobell DB. Biomass energy: The scale of the potential resource. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23(2), 65-72 (2008).
3. Pimentel D, Patzek TW. Ethanol production using corn, switchgrass, and wood; biodiesel production using soybean and sunflower. Nat. Resources Res. 14(1), 65-76 (2005).
4. Chow J, Kopp RJ, Portney PR. Energy resources and global development. Science. 302(5650), 1528-1531 (2003).
5. Pimentel D, Zuniga R, Morrison D. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ. 52(3), 273-288 (2005).
6. Vitousek PM, D'antonio CM, Loope LL, Rejmanek M, Westbrooks R. Introduced species: A significant component of humancaused global change. N.Z. J. Ecol. 21(1), 1-16 (1997).
7. Mooney HA, Hobbs RJ. Invasive Species in a Changing World. Island Press, Washington, DC, USA (2000).
8. Lonsdale WM. Inviting trouble: Introduced pasture species in northern Australia. Austral Ecol. 19(3), 345-354 (1994).
9. Drew J, Anderson N, Andow D. Conundrums of a complex vector for invasive species control: A detailed examination of the horticultural industry. Biol. Invasions 12(8), DOI:10.1007/ s10530-010-9689-8 (2010) (Epub ahead of print).
10. Mack RN, Lonsdale WM. Humans as global plant dispersers: Getting more than we bargained for. Bioscience. 51(2), 95-102 (2001).
11. Groves RH, Hosking JR. Recent incursions of weeds to Australia 1971-1995. CRC for Weed Management Systems Technical Series. 3, 1-74 (1998).
12. Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol.. 20(5), 223-228 (2005).
13. Noble IR. Attributes of invaders and the invading process: Terrestrial and vascular plants. In: Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective. Wiley, Chichester, UK, 301-313 (1989).
14. Heaton EA, Long SP, Voigt TB, Jones MB, Clifton-Brown J. Miscanthus for renewable energy generation: European Union experience and projections for Illinois. Mit. Adap. Strat. Glob. Ch. 9(4), 433-451 (2004).
15. Raghu S, Anderson RC, Daehler CC et al. Adding biofuels to the invasive species fire? Science 313(5794), 1742-1742 (2006).n Seminal paper on biofuel crop invasiveness; succinctly addresses concerns over shared traits between candidate biofuel species and invasive weed species.
16. Raghu S, Davis A. Exotic grasses as biofuels - the concerns. Ill. Nat. Stew. 16, 30-32 (2007).
17. DiTomaso JM, Barney JN, Fox AM. Biofuel feedstocks: The risk of future invasions. CAST Commentary QTA 2007-1. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa, USA (2007).
18. Buddenhagen CE, Chimera C, Clifford P. Assessing Biofuel crop invasiveness: A case study. PLoS ONE. 4(4), e5261 (2009).n Provides first quantitative comparison between potential biofuel and non-biofuel species, documenting greater propensity for biofuel species to become naturalized or invasive in Hawaii and similar tropical climates.
19. Caley P, Groves RH, Barker R. Estimating the invasion success of introduced plants. Divers. Distrib. 14(2), 196-203 (2008).
20. CAB International. Forestry Compendium. CAB International, Wallingford, UK (2005).
21. Union Internationale pour la Conservation de la Nature. Guidelines on Biofuels and Invasive Species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland (2009).n Along with [26], these comprehensive reports provide clear definitions on issues pertinent to biofuels and invasive species, and offers key recommendations to mitigate invasive species impacts along the biofuel supply chain.
22. Staples G, Herbst DR. A Tropical Garden Flora. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu, HI, USA (2005).
23. Newcombe RG. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: Comparison of eleven methods. Stat. Med. 17(8), 873-890 (1998).
24. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2010).
25. Simberloff D. The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 81-102 (2009).
26. Mauremootoo J. Biofuels and Invasive Species: Exploring the Links Between Biofuel Production Systems and Invasive Species. Union Internationale pour la Conservation de la Nature, Nairobi, Kenya, (2009). Along with [21], these comprehensive reports provide clear definitions on issues pertinent to biofuels and invasive species, and offers key recommendations to mitigate invasive species impacts along the biofuel supply chain.
27. Aikio S, Duncan RP, Hulme PE. Lag-phases in alien plant invasions: Separating the facts from the artefacts. Oikos. 119(2), 370-378 (2010).
28. Daehler CC. Short lag times for invasive tropical plants: Evidence from experimental plantings in Hawaii. PLoS One. 4(2), e4462 (2009).
29. Simberloff D, Von Holle B. Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: Invasional meltdown? Biol. Invasions. 1(1), 21-32 (1999).
30. Perring, C, Mooney, H, Williamson, M. The problem of biological invasions. In:Bioinvasions and Globalization: Ecology, Economics, Management, and Policy. Perrings C, Mooney H, Williamson M (Eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK 1-18 (2010).
31. Thomas CD, Ohlemüller R. Climate change and species' distributions: An alien future? In:Bioinvasions and Globalization: Ecology, Economics, Management, and Policy.Perrings C, Mooney H, Williamson M (Eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK 19-29 (2010).
32. Simberloff D. Invasion Biologists and the biofuels boom: Cassandras or colleagues. Weed Science. 56(6), 867-872 (2008).Addresses concerns with biofuel crop invasiveness, and criticisms of what some consider an alarmist attitude, and provides recommendations on collaborative opportunities between non-industry scientists and industry advocates.
33. Barney JN, DiTomaso JM. Nonnative species and bioenergy: Are we cultivating the next invader? Bioscience. 58(1), 64-70 (2008).Provides specific evidence for invasiveness of three candidate biofuel species using the Australian weed risk assessment (WRA), among other methods, and proposes sensible recommendations to minimize associated risks.
34. Cousens R. Risk assessment of potential biofuel species: An application for trait-based models for predicting weediness. Weed Science. 56(6), 873-882 (2008).n Addresses inherent strengths and weaknesses of WRA systems in screening potential biofuel crops for invasiveness, and proposes a multi-tiered system that includes post-entry field screening of species that pass the WRA.
35. Mack RN. Evaluating the credits and debits of a proposed biofuel species: Giant reed (Arundo donax). Weed Science. 56(6), 883-888 (2008).Insightful analysis of the perceived and real concerns over large-scale cultivation of Arundo donax for biofuel production.
36. Davis AS, Cousens RD, Hill J et al. Screening bioenergy feedstock crops to mitigate invasion risk. Front. Ecol. Environ. DOI:10.1890/090030 (2010) (Epub ahead of print).n Timely review that presents a specific model for a system of 'nested sieves' to screen proposed biofuel crops for invasiveness, using trait-based risk assessments, data from native range and field trials.
37. Pheloung PC, Williams PA, Halloy SR. A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. J. Environ. Manage. 57(4), 239-251 (1999).
38. Daehler CC, Carino DA. Predicting invasive plants: Prospects for a general screening system based on current regional models. Biol. Invasions 2(2), 93-102 (2000).
39. Caley P, Kuhnert PM. Application and evaluation of classification trees for screening unwanted plants. Austral Ecol. 31(5), 647-655 (2006).
40. McNeely JA, Mooney HA, Neville LE et al. Management and policy responses to the problem of invasive alien species. In:Global Strategy on Invasive Alien Species. McNeely JA, Mooney HA, Neville LE, Schei P, Waage JK (Eds). Union Internationale pour la Conservation de la Nature, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK 24-28 (2001).
41. Gionson TI. Humu'ula project to clear thorny nuisance, produce biofuel. Ka Wai Ola Newspaper. Honolulu, HI, USA, 26(3), April 2009.
42. Sage RF, Coiner HA, Way DA et al. Kudzu [Pueraria montana (Lour.) Merr. variety lobata]: A new source of carbohydrate for bioethanol production. Biomass & Bioenergy. 33(1), 57-61 (2009).
43. Eagle N. Commission approves biomass plant. The Garden Island, Lihue, HI, USA (2008).
44. Hughes RF, Denslow JS. Invasion by a N2-fixing tree alters function and structure in wet lowland forests of Hawaii. Ecol. Appl. 15(5), 1615-1628 (2005).
45. Openshaw K. A review of Jatropha curcas: An oil plant of unfulfilled promise. Biomass & Bioenergy 19(1), 1-15 (2000).
46. Fairless D. Biofuel: The little shrub that could - maybe. Nature 449(7163), 652-655 (2007).
47. Achten WM, Nielsen LR, Aerts R et al. Towards domestication of Jatropha curcas. Biofuels. 1(1), 91-107 (2010).
48. Wagner WL, Herbst DR, Sohmer SH. Manual of the Flowering Plants of Hawaii. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, HI, USA (1999).
49. Hillebrand W. Flora of the Hawaiian Islands. Williams & Norgate, London, UK (1888).
50. Loope LL, Mueller-Dombois D. Characteristics of invaded islands, with special reference to Hawaii. In:Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective. Drake JA, Monney HA (Eds). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, NY, USA, 257-280 (1989).
51. Scholz V, da Silva JN. Prospects and risks of the use of castor oil as a fuel. Biomass and Bioenergy 32(2), 95-100 (2008).
52. Weber E. Invasive Plant Species of the World: A Reference Guide to Environmental Weeds. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK (2003).
53. Smith NM. Weeds of the Wet/Dry Tropics of Australia - a Field Guide. Environment Centre NT Inc., Darwin, Australia (2002).
54. Poteet M. Biodiesel Crop Implementation in Hawaii. Hawaii Agriculture Research Center, Aiea, Hawaii, USA (2006).
55. Hamilton C. Funding could define new future in energy for HC&S. The Maui News, Kahului, HI, USA, April 8, 2010.
56. Gomes A. The Potential of biofuels. The Honolulu Advertiser, Honolulu, HI, USA, April 8, 2010.
57. Macintyre B. Poison plant could help to cure the planet. The Times, London, UK, July 28, 2007.
58. Gomes A. Koa Ridge debate nearing conclusion. The Honolulu Advertiser, Honolulu, HI, USA, April 26, 2010.
59. Gima C. Small biofuel farm bears fruit. Honolulu Star Bulletin, Honolulu, HI, USA March 08, 2010.
60. HDOA. Hawaii Administrative Rules. Chapter 68. Noxious Weed Rules. Hawaii Department of Agriculture, Honolulu, HI, USA (1992).
61. HDOA. Hawaii Administrative Rules. Chapter 67. Seed Rules. Hawaii Department of Agriculture, Honolulu, HI, USA (1992).
62. Liu H, Stiling P. Testing the enemy release hypothesis: A review and meta-analysis. Biol. Invasions 8(7), 1535-1545 (2006).
63. Keane RM, Crawley MJ. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17(4), 164-170 (2002).
64. Gressel J. Transgenics are imperative for biofuel crops. Plant Sci. 174(3), 246-263 (2008).
65. Hails RS, Morley K. Genes invading new populations: A risk assessment perspective. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20(5), 245-252 (2005).
66. Chisti Y. Fuels from microalgae. Biofuels. 1(2), 233-235 (2010).
67. Khan SA, Hussain MZ, Prasad S, Banerjee UC. Prospects of biodiesel production from microalgae in India. Ren. Sust. Ener. Rev. 13(9), 2361-2372 (2009).
68. Service RF. ExxonMobil fuels venter's efforts to run vehicles on algae-based oil. Science. 325(5939), 379 (2009).
69. Westervelt R. ExxonMobil to Invest $600 million in algae based biofuels. Chemical Week. 171(19), 14-14 (2009).
70. Pienkos PT. The promise and challenges of microalgal-derived biofuels. Biofuels, Bioproducts Biorefining 3(4), 431-440 (2009).Overview of the state of microalgal biofuel development, including: Funding, cultivation, processing and research challenges that will need to be addressed to realize a sustainable industry.
71. Phalan B. The social and environmental impacts of biofuels in Asia: An overview. Appl. Ener. 86(Suppl. 1), S21-S29 (2009).
72. Barsanti L, Gualtieri P. Algae: Anatomy, Biochemistry, and Biotechnology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA (2006).
73. Li Y, Horsman M, Wu N, Lan CQ, Dubois-Calero N. Biofuels from microalgae. Biotechnol. Progs. 24(4), 815-820 (2008).
74. Tomaselli L. The microalgal cell. In:Handbook of Microalgal Culture: Biotechnology and Applied Phycology.Richmond A (Ed.) Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK, 3-19 (2004).
75. Sydney EB, Sturm W, de Carvalho JC et al. Potential carbon dioxide fixation by industrially important microalgae. Biores. Technol. 101(15), 5892-5896 (2010).
76. Zingone A, Oksfeldt EH. The diversity of harmful algal blooms: A challenge for science and management. Ocean & Coastal Manag. 43(8-9), 725-748 (2000).Comprehensive review of the diversity of organisms that cause harmful algal blooms, negative impacts, bloom dynamics, climatic influences and research and management needs.
77. Anderson DM. Approaches to monitoring, control and management of harmful algal blooms (HABs). Ocean & Coastal Manag. 52(7), 342-347 (2009).
78. Lovell SJ, Drake LA. Tiny stowaways: Analyzing the economic benefits of a US environmental protection agency permit regulating ballast water discharges. Environ. Manag. 43(3), 546-555 (2009).
79. Hegaret H, Shumway SE, Wikfors GH, Pate S, Burkholder JAM. Potential transport of harmful algae via relocation of bivalve molluscs. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 361, 169-179 (2008).
80. Scorzetti G, Brand LE, Hitchcock GL et al. Multiple simultaneous detection of harmful algal blooms (HABs) through a high throughput bead array technology, with potential use in phytoplankton community analysis. Harmful algae. 8(2), 196-211 (2009).
81. Edwards M, Johns DG, Leterme SC, Svendsen E, Richardson AJ. Regional climate change and harmful algal blooms in the northeast Atlantic. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51(2), 820-829 (2006).
82. Maso M, Garcés E. Harmful microalgae blooms (HAB); problematic and conditions that induce them. Mar. Pollut.Bull. 53(10-12), 620-630 (2006).
83. Posten C, Schaub G. Microalgae and terrestrial biomass as source for fuels - a process view. J. Biotechnol. 142(1), 64-69 (2009).
84. Flöder S, Kilroy C. Didymosphenia geminata (Protista, Bacillariophyceae) invasion, resistance of native periphyton communities, and implications for dispersal and management. Biodiversity and Conservation. 18(14), 3809-3824 (2009).
85. Kirkwood A, Shea T, Jackson LJ, McCauley E. Didymosphenia geminata in two Alberta headwater rivers: An emerging invasive species that challenges conventional views on algal bloom development. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 64(12), 1703-1709 (2007).
86. Van Dolah FM, Roelke D, Greene RM. Health and ecological impacts of harmful algal blooms: Risk assessment needs. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal. 7(5), 1329-1345 (2001).
87. Crosti R, Cascone C, Cipollaro S. Use of a weed risk assessment for the Mediterranean region of central Italy to prevent loss of functionality and biodiversity in agroecosystems. Biol. Invasions 12(6), 1607-1616 (2010).
88. GISP. Assessing the Risk of Invasive Alien Species Promoted for Biofuels. The Global Invasive Species Programme, Nairobi, Kenya (2009).Concise report providing sensible recommendations for minimizing invasion risks associated with biofuel crop cultivation, including a useful table summarizing candidate biofuel species.
89. Howard G, Ziller S. Alien alert - plants for biofuel may be invasive. Bioenergy Business, 14-16 July/August (2008).
90. Gordon DR, Onderdonk DA, Fox AM, Stocker RK. Consistent accuracy of the Australian weed risk assessment system across varied geographies. Divers. Distrib. 14(2), 234-242 (2008).
91. Weber J, Dane Panetta F, Virtue J, Pheloung P. An analysis of assessment outcomes from eight years' operation of the Australian border weed risk assessment system. J. Environ. Manage. 90(2), 798-807 (2009).