The challenge of non-ergodicity in network neuroscience

Network: Computation in Neural Systems

Volumn 22, Issue 1-4, 2011, Pages 148-153

  Medaglia, John D ^a   Ramanathan, Deepa M ^a   Venkatesan, Umesh M ^a   Hillary, Frank G ^a,b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENN STATE MILTON S HERSHEY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

functional neuroimaging; network modeling; neuroscience; traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BRAIN INJURY; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NEUROSCIENCE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW;

BRAIN INJURIES; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HUMANS; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); NEUROSCIENCES;

EID: 82955164010     PISSN: 0954898X     EISSN: 13616536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638237.2011.639604     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Bullmore E, Sporns O. 2009. Complex brain networks; graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 10:186-98.
2. Calhoun VD, Liu J, Adali T. 2009. A review of group ICA for fMRI data and ICA for joint inference of imaging, genetic, and ERP data. NeuroImage 45:S163-S72.
3. Gates KM, Molenaar PC, Hillary FG, Slobounov S. 2011. Extended unified SEM approach for modeling event-related fMRI data. NeuroImage 54:1151-8.
4. Hillary FG, Genova HM, Medaglia JD, Fitzpatrick NM, Chiou KS, Wardecker BM, Franklin RG, Wang J, DeLuca J. 2010. The nature of processing speed deficits in traumatic brain injury: Is less brain more?. Brain Imaging and Behavior 4:141-54.
5. Kim J, Zhu W, Chang L, Bentler PM, Ernst T. 2007. Unified structural equation modeling approach for the analysis of multisubject, multivariate functional MRI data. Human Brain Mapping 28:85-93.
6. Lamiell JT. 1998. 'Nomothetic' and 'Idiographc': Contrasting Windelband's Understanding with Contemporary Usage. Theory Psychology 8:23-38.
7. Molenaar PCM. 2004. A Manifesto on Psychology as Idiographic Science: Bringing the Person Back Into Scientific Psychology, This Time Forever. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspective 2:201-18.
8. Molenaar PCM. 2009. The New Person-Specific Paradigm in Psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science 18: 112-7.
9. Rypma B, D'Esposito M. 2000. Isolating the neural mechanisms of age-related changes in human working memory. Nature Neuroscience 3(5):509-15.
10. Rypma B, Prabhakaran V, Desmond JE, Glover GH, Gabrieli JDE. 1999. Load-dependent roles of frontal brain regions in the maintenance of working memory. Neuroimage 9(2):216-26.
11. Rypma B, Prabhakaran V, Desmond JE, Gabrieli JD. 2001. Age differences in prefrontal cortical activity in working memory. Psychology and Aging 16: 371-84.
12. Rypma B, Berger JS, D'Esposito M. 2002. The influence of working-memory demand and subject performance on prefrontal cortical activity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14:721-31.
13. Rypma B, Berger JS, Prabhakaran V, Bly BM, Kimberg DY, Biswal BB. 2006. Neural correlates of cognitive efficiency. Neuroimage 33:969-79.
14. Smith SM, Miller KL, Salimi-Khorshidi G, Webster M, Beckmann CF, Nichols TE, Ramsey JD, Woolrich MW. 2011. Network modeling methods for fMRI. NeuroImage 54:875-91.
15. Sweet LH, Rao SM, Primeau M, Durgerian S, Cohen RA. 2006. Functional magnetic resonance imaging response to increased verbal working memory demands among patients with multiple sclerosis. Human Brain Mapping 27(1):28-36.