Ten themes for eco-innovation policies in Europe

Sapiens

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 1-20

  Kemp, René ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Eco innovation; Effective governance; Innovation policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 82755192084     PISSN: 19933800     EISSN: 19933819     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Arundel, A., M. Kanerva & R. Kemp (2011). Integrated Innovation Policy for an Integrated Problem: Addressing Climate Change, Resource Scarcity and Demographic Change to 2030. PRO INNO Europe: INNO-Grips II report. Brussels: European Commission, DG Enterprise and Industry.
2. Bergek, A. et al. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis. Research Policy 37(3): 407-429.
3. Bleischwitz, R. et al. (2009). Eco-innovation - putting the EU on the path to a resource and energy efficient economy. (Wuppertal Spezial 38.) Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institute.
4. Bleischwitz, R., P.J.J. Welfens & Z.X. Zhang (2010). Introduction of special issue "The international economics of resources and resource policy". International Economics and Economic Policy 7: 147-151.
5. Borrás, S. (2009). The Widening and Deepening of Innovation Policy: What Conditions Provide for Effective Governance. CIRCLE Electronic Working Paper Series Paper no. 2009/02.
6. Braun, D. (2008). Organising the political coordination of knowledge and innovation policies. Science and Public Policy 35: 227-239.
7. Brouwer, E. et al. (2002). WBSO nader beschouwd, onderzoek naar de effectiviteit van de WBSO. PWC/ Dialogic/ TU Delft, Utrecht.
8. Clark, K. (1985). The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution. Research Policy 14: 235-251.
9. Cohen, M. (2006). A social problems framework for the critical appraisal of automobility and sustainable systems innovation. Mobilities 1: 23-38.
10. Dries, I., J. Larosse & P. Van Humbeeck (2006). Linking innovation policy and sustainable development in Flanders. In: Governance of Innovation Systems: Case Studies in Cross-Sectoral Policy, pp. 245-270. Paris: OECD.
11. Edquist, C. (2004). Systems of innovation, perspectives and challenges. In: J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, R.R. Nelson (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, pp. 181-208. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Ehret, O. & M. Dignum (2010). Introducing hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles in Germany. In: F. Geels, R. Kemp, G. Dudley and G. Lyons (Eds.) Automobility in Transition? A Sociotechnical Analysis of Sustainable Transport. London: Routledge.
13. Elzen, B., F.W. Geels & K. Green (Eds.) (2004) System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
14. Edler, J. & L. Georghiou (2007). Public procurement and innovation-resurrecting the demand side. Research Policy 36: 949-963.
15. ERTRAC (2010). Towards a 50% more efficient road transport system by 2030, ERTRAC Strategic Research Agenda 2010. European Road Transport Research Advisory Council. http://www.eurosfaire.prd.fr/7pc/doc/1297329503_ertrac_sra_2010.pdf
16. European Commission (2004). Stimulating technologies for sustainable development: an environmental technologies action plan for the European Union. Communication from the Commission, COM(2004) 38 final. Brussels.
17. European Commission (2007). A European Strategic Energy Technology Plan (SET-Plan): Full impact assessment. Commission Staff Working Paper. SEC(2007) 1508, COM(2007) 723 final.Brussels, 22.11.2007.
18. European Commission (2009). Investing in the development of low carbon technologies (SET-Plan). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2009) 519 final. Brussels, 7.10.2009.
19. European Commission (2010). Rationale for Action, Commission Staff Working Paper, accompanying document Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative Innovation Union, SEC(2010) 1161, Brussels, 6.10.2010, COM(2010) 546 final.
20. Faber, A., R. Kemp & G. van der Veen (2008). Innovation policy for the environment in the Netherlands and EU. In: C. Nauwelaers, R. Wintjes (Eds.). Innovation Policy in Europe. Measurement and Strategy, pp. 171-202. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
21. Gallup (2011). Flash Eurobarometer 315 Attitudes of European entrepreneurs towards eco-innovation, Survey conducted by The Gallup Organization, Hungary upon the request of Directorate-General Environment of the European Commission.
22. Gassler, H., W. Polt & C. Rammer (2008). Priority setting in technology policy. Historical developments and recent trends. In: C. Nauwelaers, R. Wintjes (Eds.), Innovation Policy in Europe. Measurement and Strategy, pp. 203-224. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
23. Geels, F.W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study, Research Policy 31(8-9): 1257-1274.
24. Geels, F.W. (2004), From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory, Research Policy 33(6-7): 897-920.
25. Geels, F.W. & R.P.J.M. Raven (2007). Socio-cognitive evolution and co-evolution in competing technical trajectories: Biogas development in Denmark (1970-2002). International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 14(1), 63-77.
26. Grin, J. et al. (2010). Transitions To Sustainable Development. New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change, New York: Routledge.
27. Guy, K. & C. Nauwelaers (2003). Benchmarking STI policies in Europe: in search of good practice. In: The IPTS Report, No. 71. Sevilla: IPTS.
28. Hekkert, M.P. et al. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: a new approach for analyzing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74(4): 413-432.
29. Henderson, R. & R.G. Newell (2010). Accelerating Innovation In Energy: Insights from Multiple Sectors (Harvard Business School working paper 10-067).
30. IBO (2002). Samenwerken en stroomlijnen: opties voor een effectief innovatiebeleid. Eindrapportage Interdepartementaal Beleidsonderzoek (EZ-02-311), Den Haag.
31. IEA (2010). Energy technology perspectives 2010. Paris: OECD and IEA.
32. Jacobsson, S. & A. Johnson (2000). The diffusion of renewable energy technology: an analytical framework and key issues for research. Energy Policy 28: 625-640.
33. Jacobsson, S. et al. (2009). EU renewable energy support policy: faith or facts? Energy Policy 37: 2143-2146.
34. Jaffe, A.B., R.G. Newell & R.N. Stavins (2005). A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy. Ecological Economics 54(2-3): 164-174.
35. Kaiser, R. & H. Prange (2005). Missing the Lisbon target? Multi-level innovation systems and the challenge for EU policy coordination. Journal of Public Policy 25(2): 241-263.
36. Kemp, R. (1994). Technology and the transition to environmental sustainability. the problem of technological regime shifts. Futures 26(10): 1023-46.
37. Kemp, R. (2000). Technology and environmental policy-innovation effects of past policies and suggestions for improvement. In: OECD proceedings Innovation and the Environment, pp. 35-61. Paris: OECD.
38. Kemp, R. & P. Pearson (2008). Measuring eco-innovation (Final Report MEI project). Maastricht: UNU-MERIT.
39. Kemp, R. & S. Pontoglio (in press). The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments-A typical case of the blind men and the elephant?, submitted to Ecological Economics.
40. Kemp, R. & S. Zundel (2007). Environmental innovation policy: Is steering innovation processes possible? In: M. Lehmann-Waffenschmidt (Ed.), Innovations Towards Sustainability. Conditions and Consequences, pp. 25-46. Heidelberg, New York: Physica Verlag.
41. Kivimaa, P. (2008). The innovation effects of environmental policies: linking policies, companies and innovations in the Nordic pulp and paper industry. Acta Universitatis Oeconomicae Helsingiensis A-329, Helsinki School of Economics.
42. Kletzan-Slamanig, D et al. (2009). Assessment of ETAP roadmaps with regard to their eco-innovation potential. Technical Report 2: Country fiches for the ETAP roadmaps. Vienna: Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO).
43. Krozer, Y. (2002). Milieu & Innovatie. PhD Thesis. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen.
44. Lipsey, R. & K. Carlaw (1998). Technology policies in neoclassical and structuralist-evolutionary models. STI Review 22: 31-73.
45. Lundvall, B. & S. Borrás (1998). The Globalising Learning Economy: Implications for Innovation Policy. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
46. Lundvall, B.-A. & M. Tomlinson (2002). International benchmarking as a policy learning tool. In: M.J. Rodrigues (Ed.) The New Knowledge Economy in Europe, pp. 203-231. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
47. Malerba, F. (2009). Increase learning, break knowledge lockins and foster dynamic complementarities: evolutionary and system perspectives on technology policy in industrial dynamics. In: D. Foray (Ed.) The New Economics of Technology Policy, pp. 33-45. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
48. Metcalfe, J.S. & L. Georghiou (1998). Equilibrium and evolutionary foundations of technology policy. STI Review 22: 75-100.
49. Mowery, D.C., R.R. Nelson & B.R. Martin (2010). Technology policy and global warming: why new policy models are needed (or why putting new wine in old models won't work). Research Policy 39(8): 1011-1023.
50. Mytelka, L.K. & K. Smith (2002). Policy learning and innovation theory: an interactive and co-evolving process. Research Policy 31(8-9): 1467-1479.
51. Nauwelaers, C. & R. Wintjes (2008). Innovation policy, innovation in policy: policy learning within and across systems and clusters. In: C. Nauwelaers & R. Wintjes (Eds.), Innovation Policy in Europe. Measurement and Strategy, pp. 225-268. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
52. Nelson, R.R. (2009). Building effective 'innovation systems' versus dealing with market failures as ways of thinking about technology policy. In: D. Foray (Ed.) The New Economics of Technology Policy, pp. 7-16. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
53. Newell, R.G. (2010). The role of markets and policies in delivering innovation for climate change mitigation. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 26(2): 253-269.
54. Nill, J. & R. Kemp (2009). Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: from niche to paradigm? Research Policy 38(4): 668-680.
55. OECD (1999). Managing National Systems of Innovation. Paris: OECD.
56. OECD (2005) Oslo Manual. The measurement of scientific and technological activities. Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. Paris: OECD.
57. OECD (2008) Sustainable manufacturing and eco-innovation. First steps in building a common framework. DSTI/IND(2008)16/REV1. Paris: OECD.
58. OECD (2011). Better Policies to Support Eco-innovation. OECD studies on Environmental Innovation. Paris: OECD.
59. Parkhurst, G. et al. (in press). Intermodal personal mobility: A niche caught between two regimes. In: Geels, F.W., R. Kemp, G. Dudley, G. Lyons (Eds.) Automobility in Transition? A sociotechnical analysis of sustainable transport. London: Routledge.
60. Pontoglio, S. (2010). An early assessment of the influence on eco-innovation of the EU emissions trading scheme: evidence from the Italian paper industry. In: Mazzanti M., Montini A (Eds.) Environmental Efficiency, Innovation and Economic Performances, pp. 81-91. London: Routledge.
61. Popp, D. (2006). R&D subsidies and climate policy: is there a 'free lunch'? Climatic Change 77 (3-4): 311-41.
62. Popp, D. (2010). Innovation and Climate Policy, NBER Working Paper No. 15673.
63. Remøe, S.O. (2008). Innovation governance in dynamic economies. Lessons from the OECD MONIT project. In: C. Nauwelaers & R. Wintjes (Eds.), Innovation Policy in Europe. Measurement and Strategy, pp. 139-170. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
64. Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation: eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics 32: 319-332.
65. Ringeling, A.B. (2005). Instruments in four: the elements of policy design. In: P. Eliadis, M.M. Hills, M. Howlett (Eds), Designing Government: From Instruments to Governance, pp. 185-202. Kingston, Ontario: McGill-Queens University Press.
66. Rip, A. & R. Kemp (1998). Technological change. In: S. Rayner and L. Malone (Eds.), Human Choice and Climate Change, pp. 327-399. Washington D.C.: Batelle Press.
67. Rogge, K., M. Schneider & V.H. Hoffmann (2010). The innovation impact of EU emission trading - findings of company case studies in the German Power Sector. Fraunhofer ISI Working Paper Sustainability and Innovation No. S 2/2010.
68. Sartorius C. & S. Zundel (Eds.) (2005), Time Strategies, Innovation and Environmental Policy. Advances in Ecological Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
69. Schrama, G.J.I. & S. Sedlacek (2003). Environmental and Technology Policy in Europe. Technological Innovations and Policy Integration. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
70. Smith, K. (2000). Innovation as a systemic phenomenon: rethinking the role of policy. Enterprise & Innovation Management Studies 1(1), 73-102.
71. Smith, K. (2008). Climate change and radical energy innovation: the policy issues. Report to Garnaut Commission on climate Change, Australia.
72. Smith, A. & A. Stirling (2010). The politics of social-ecological resilience and sustainable socio-technical transitions. Ecology and Society 15(1): 11.
73. Smits, R. & S. Kuhlmann (2004). The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 1(1/2): 4-32.
74. Soete, L. & A. Arundel (1993). An integrated approach to European innovation and technology diffusion policy: a Maastricht memorandum. Publication EUR 15090. Brussels: EU.
75. Steward, F. (2008). Breaking the boundaries. Transformative innovation for the global good, NESTA provocation 07, April 2008.
76. UNEP (2011), Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth: A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel, M. Fischer-Kowalski et al. (Authors). Nairobi, Kenya: UNEP.
77. Unruh, G.C. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28: 817-830.
78. Voss, J.-P. (2007). Designs on Governance. Development of Policy Instruments and Dynamics in Governance. PhD Thesis, University of Twente.
79. Zundel, S. et al. (2005), Conceptual Framework, In: C. Sartorius & S. Zundel (Eds.) Time Strategies, Innovation and Environmental Policy. Advances in Ecological Economics, pp. 10-51. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.