Redefining innovation - Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics

Ecological Economics

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 319-332

  Rennings, Klaus ^a  

^a CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN ECONOMIC RESEARCH ZEW   (Germany)

Author keywords

Economic incentives and disincentives; Evolutionary economics; Innovation; Technology

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH; INNOVATION;

EID: 0033982081     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. BMBF, GSF (Editors), 1999. Innovative approaches for regional economic development - demonstration projects for sustainable development 1998-2002. Federal Ministry of Research and Education, Research Center for Environment and Health, Bonn, Munich, http://www.gsf.de/PTUKF/deutsch.html.
2. Blazejczak, J., Edler, D., Hemmelskamp, J., Jaenicke, M., 1999. Umweltpolitik und Innovation - Politikmuster und Innovationswirkungen im internationalen Vergleich. Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht (ZfU), 1/99, pp. 1-32.
3. Brockmann K.L. Anreizmechanismen und Innovationswirkungen 'freiwilliger Selbstverpflichtungen' im Umweltschutz-eine spieltheoretische Analyze. Rennings K. Innovation durch Umweltpolitik. ZEW Wirtschaftsanalysen. 1999;103-146 Nomos Verlag, Baden Baden.
4. Carraro C. Environmental technological innovation and diffusion: model analysis. Hemmelskamp J., Leone F., Rennings K. Innovation-oriented Environmental Regulation: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Analysis. 1999;Physica Verlag, Heidelberg, New York.
5. Cary, J. 1998. Institutional innovation in natural resource management in Australia: the triumph of creativity over adversity. In: Abstracts of the Conference 'Knowledge Generation and transfer: Implications for Agriculture in the 21st Century'. University of California-Berkeley, June 18-19, pp. 11-13.
6. Cleff T., Rennings K. Determinants of environmental innovation-empirical evidence from the Mannheim Innovation Panel and an additional telephone survey. Hemmelskamp J., Leone F., Rennings K. Innovation-oriented Environmental Regulation: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Analysis. 1999;Physica Verlag, Heidelberg, New York.
7. Cleff, T. and Rennings, K., 1999b. Determinants of environmental process and product innovation - evidence from the Mannheim Innovation Panel and a follow-up telephone survey, Special issue on integrated product policy, Karl, M., Orwat, C. (Ed.), European Environment 9 (5), in press.
8. Dosi G. The nature of the innovation process. Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R., Silverberg G., Soete L. Technical Change and Economic Theory. 1988;221-238 Printer Publishers, London.
9. Duchin F. Reducing pressures on the environment: forward-looking solutions and the role of formal models. Hemmelskamp J., Leone F., Rennings K. Innovation-oriented Environmental Regulation: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Analysis. 1999;Physica Verlag, Heidelberg, New York.
10. Faucheux S., Nicolai I. Environmental technological change and governance in sustainable development policy. Ecol. Econom. 27(1998):1998;243-256.
11. Fischer, C., Parry, I.W.H., Pizer, W.H., 1998. Instrument choice for environmental protection when technological innovation is endogenous. Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper 99-04, Washington.
12. Freeman C. The Economics of Hope. 1992;Pinter Publishers, London, New York.
13. Fuzzler C. Driving Eco-Innovation. 1996;Pitman Publishing, London.
14. Green K., McMeekin A., Irwin A. Technological trajectories and R & D for environmental innovation in UK firms. Futures. 26:1994;1047-1059.
15. Hemmelskamp J. Environmental Policy Instruments and their Effects on Innovation. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2:1997;177-194.
16. Hemmelskamp J. Innovationswirkungen der Umweltpolitik im Windenergiebereich. Klemmer P. Innovationen und Umwelt. 1999;81-112 Analytica-Verlag, Berlin.
17. Hohmeyer, O., and Koschel, H., 1995. Umweltpolitische Instrumente zur Förderung des Einsatzes integrierter Umwelttechnik. Final Report of a Study of ZEW commissioned by the Büro für Technikfolgenabschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag (TAB). Mannheim, copied manuscript.
18. Jaenicke, M., 1999. Policy patterns and innovation impacts: an international comparison. Paper presented at the International Conference 'Innovation-oriented Environmental Regulation - Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Analysis'. Potsdam, 27-29 May 1999, organized by IPTS, Spain, ZEW, Germany and MERIT, Netherlands.
19. Jaffe, A.B., Palmer, K., 1996. Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 5545, Washington D.C.
20. Kemp R. Environmental Policy and Technical Change. 1997;Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Brookfield.
21. Klemmer, P., Lehr, U. and Löbbe, K., 1999. Environmental Innovation. Volume 3 of publications from a Joint Project on Innovation Impacts of Environmental Policy Instruments. Synthesis Report of a project commissioned by the German Ministry of Research and Technology (BMBF), Analytica-Verlag, Berlin.
22. Kuehn I., Osório-Peters S. Innovationswirkungen freiwilliger Selbstverpflichtungen imUmweltschutz - spieltheoretische Analysen und Fallstudien zum Klimaschutz in Deutschland un den Niederlanden. Klemmer P. Innovationen und Umwelt. 1999;329-344 Analytica-Verlag, Berlin.
23. Minsch J. Nachhaltigkeit und institutionelle Innovationen. Rennnings K., Hohmeyer O. Nachhaltigkeit. 1997;297-329 Nomos-Verlag, Baden-Baden.
24. Norgaard R. Co-evolutionary development potential. Land Econom. 60(2):1984;160-173.
25. Norgaard R. Development Betrayed. 1994;Routledge, London and New York.
26. Pavitt K. Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards an taxonomy and a theory. Res. Pol. 13:1984;343-373.
27. Pestel R., Radermacher F.-J. Robuste Pfade zur globalen Stabilitaet. Morath K. Welt im Wandel-Wege zu dauerhaft-umweltgerechtem Wirtschaften. 1996;Frankfurter Institut, Bad Homburg.
28. OECD, 1997. OECD Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data - Oslo-Manual, OECD/Eurostat, Paris.
29. Porter M.E., van der Linde C. Towards a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J. Econom. Perspect. 9(4):1995;97-118.
30. Porter, M.E., van der Linde C., 1995b. Green and Competitive. Ending the Stalemate. Harvard Business Review, September-October 1995, pp. 120-134.
31. Rader, N. and Norgaard, R., 1996. Efficiency and Sustainability in Restructured Electricity Markets: The Renewables Portfolio Standard. Electricity Journal, July 1996 9 (6) pp. 37-49.
32. Rennings, K., Koschel, H., Brockmann, K.L. and Kuehn, I., 1998. A Regulatory Framework for a Policy of Sustainability-Lessons from the Neoliberal School. Ecological Economics, 28 (1999), pp. 197-212.
33. Rennings K., Wiggering H. Steps towards indicators of sustainable development - linking economic and ecological concepts. Ecol. Econom. 20:1997;25-36.
34. Scherhorn G., Reisch L., Schroedl S. Wege zu nachhaltigen Konsummustern-Ueberblick ueber den Stand der Forschung und vorrangige Forschungsthemen. 1997;Metropolis-Verlag, Marburg.
35. SRU-Rat von Sachverstaendigen fuer Umweltfragen (German Council of Environmental Advisers), 1998. Umweltgutachten 1998. Verlag Metzler-Poeschel, Stuttgart.
36. Templin, N., 1991. California Rules Push Car Makers to Clean Up Act. Wall Street Journal Europe, March 27, 1991.
37. Ulph A.M. Strategic environmental policy and international competitiveness. Siebert H. Elemente einer rationalen Umweltpolitik. Thesen fuer eine umweltpolitische Neuorientierung. 1996;337-376 Mohr Verlag, Tuebingen.