Open access to research outputs-institutional policies and researchers' views: Results from two complementary surveys

New Review of Academic Librarianship

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 4-25

  Creaser, Claire ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Open access; Repositories; Research outputs; Scholarly communication; Self archiving

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960614263     PISSN: 13614533     EISSN: 17407834     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13614530903162854     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Brighton, R. et al. Open access to Research Outputs, Report to RCUK. RCUK, 2008. Web 3 Jul. 2009. http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/news/090422.htm
2. Electronic Publishing Services. UK Scholarly journals: 2006 baseline report: an evidence-based analysis of data concerning scholarly publishing. Report for the Research Information Network, Research Councils UK and the Department of Trade and Industry, 2006. Web 3 Jul 2009. http://www.rin.ac.uk/files/UK%20Scholarly%20Journals%202006%20Baseline%20Report.pdf
3. Houghton, J., B. Rasmussen, P. Sheehan, C. Oppenheim, A. Morris, C. Creaser, H. Greenwood, M. Summers, and A. Gourlay. Economic Implications of Alternative Scholarly Publishing Models Exploring the costs and benefits. Joint Information Systems Committee, 2009. Web 3 Jul. 2009. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/rpteconomicoapublishing.pdf
4. Key Perspectives. JISC/OSI Journal Authors Report, Report for The Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) and the Open Society Institute (OSI) by Key Perspectives, Truro, 2004. Web 3 Jul. 2009. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploadeddocuments/JISCOAreport1.pdf
5. Key Perspectives. Researchers' use of academic libraries and their services: report commissioned by the Research Information Network and the Consortium of Research Libraries, Key Perspectives, Truro, 2007. Web 3 Jul. 2009. http://www.rin.ac.uk/researchers-use-libraries
6. Norris, M., C. Oppenheim and F. Rowland, F. "The Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59.12 (2008): 1963-1972. Print.
7. Publishing & the Ecology of European Research. PEER. Peer Project, n.d. Web 3 Jul. 2009. http://www.peerproject.eu/about/RAE.
8. RAE. 2008. Web 3 Jul. 2009. http://www.rae.ac.uk/
9. Research Information Network. Activities, costs and funding flows in the scholarly communications system in the UK. RIN, 2008. Web 3 Jul. 2009. http://www.rin.ac.uk/costs-funding-flows
10. Rowlands, I. and D. Nicholas. Scholarly communication in the digital environment: what do authors want? Findings of an international survey of author opinion, CIBER, University College London, London. 2004. http://www.publishing.ucl.ac.uk/papers/2004Rowlandsetal.pdf
11. Schroter, S. and L. Tite."Open access publishing and author-pays business models: a survey of authors' knowledge and perceptions", Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99.3 (2006): 141-148. Web 3 Jul. 2009. http://jrsm.rsmjournals.com/cgi/reprint/99/3/141
12. Sparks, S. JISC Disciplinary Differences Report, Report prepared for the Joint Information Systems Committee by Rightscom Ltd, August 2005. Web 3 Jul. 2009. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploadeddocuments/Disciplinary%20Differences%20and%20Needs.doc
13. University of Michigan, OAIster, University of Michigan. Web 3 Jul. 2009. http://www.oaister.org/
14. University of Nottingham, Sherpa Search. University of Nottingham. Web 3 Jul. 2009. http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/repositories/sherpasearchalluk.html