Effect of linkage disequilibrium on the identification of functional variants

Genetic Epidemiology

Volumn 35, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2011, Pages

  Thomas, Alun ^a   Abel, Haley J ^b   Di, Yanming ^c   Faye, Laura L ^d   Jin, Jing ^e   Liu, Jin ^f   Wu, Zheyan ^g   Paterson, Andrew D ^h  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^e Stony Brook University   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^g Worcester Polytechnic Institute   (United States)

^h HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Graphical modeling; Higher criticism; Principal components analysis; Robust regression; Score tests; Two stage study designs

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ETHNICITY; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; HUMAN; MONTE CARLO METHOD; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STUDY DESIGN;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GENOMIC STRUCTURAL VARIATION; HUMAN GENOME PROJECT; HUMANS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 82455219101     PISSN: 07410395     EISSN: 10982272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20660     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Abel HJ, Thomas A. 2011. Case-control association testing by graphical modeling for Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 mini-exome sequence data. BMC Proc 5:S62.
2. Armentrout SL, Carlson SE. 2010. Identifying rare variants of large effect using cross-model test statistics. Unpublished.
3. Di Y, Mi G, Sun L, Dong R, Zhu H, Peng L. 2011. Power of association tests in the presence of multiple causal variants. BMC Proc 5:S63.
4. Faye LL, Bull SB. 2011. Two-stage study designs combining genome-wide association studies, tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms, and exome sequencing: accuracy of genetic effect estimates. BMC Proc 5:S64.
5. Faye LL, Sun L, Dimitromanolakis A, Bull SB. 2011. A flexible genome-wide bootstrap method that accounts for ranking and threshold-selection bias in GWAS interpretation and replication study design. Stat Med 30:1898-1912.
6. Hall P, Jin J. 2010. Innovated higher criticism for detecting sparse heterogeneous mixtures. Ann Stat 38:1686-1732.
7. He S, Wu Z. 2011. Gene-based higher criticism methods for large-scale exonic single-nucleotide polymorphism data. BMC Proc 5:S65.
8. Jin J, Cerise JE, Kang SJ, Yoon EJ, Yoon S, Mendell NR, Finch SJ. 2011. Principal components ancestry adjustment for Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 data. BMC Proc 5:S66.
9. King CR, Nicolae DL. 2010. Population-genetics guided modeling of sequence association. Unpublished.
10. Lauritzen SL, Spiegelhalter DJ. 1988. Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their applications to expert systems. J R Stat Soc Ser B 50:157-224.
11. Lee J, Kim K, Ahn S, Yeon B, Huang J. 2010. Gene set analysis for rare variants. Unpublished.
12. Li JZ, Absher DM, Tang H, Southwick AM, Casto AM, Ramachandran S, Cann HM, Barsh GS, Feldman M, Cavalli-Sforza LL, Myers RM. 2008. Worldwide human relationships inferred from genome-wide patterns of variation. Science 319:1100-1104.
13. Liu J, Wang K, Ma S, Huang J. 2011. Regularized regression method for genome-wide association studies. BMC Proc 5:S67.
14. 1000 Genomes Project Consortium. 2010. A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nat Genet 467:1061-1073.
15. Paterson A. 2010. Family-based tests of linkage/association for the mini-exome data of GAW17. Unpublished.
16. Song J, Galbraith S, Motyer A, Pardy C, Wilson SR. 2010. Analysis of the GAW17 family data using mixed models with a sliding window approach. Unpublished.
17. Thomas A. 2005. Characterizing allelic associations from unphased diploid data by graphical modeling. Genet Epidemiol 29:23-35.
18. Tibshirani R. 1996. Regression shrinkage and selection via the LASSO. J R Stat Soc Ser B 58:267-288.
19. Tukey JW. 1976. T13 n: The higher criticism. Course notes, Princeton University.
20. Zhang C-H. 2010. Nearly unbiased variable selection under minimax concave penalty. Ann Stat 38: 894-942.