An advantage for active versus passive aperture-viewing in visual object recognition

Perception

Volumn 40, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1154-1163

  Craddock, Matt ^a,c   Martinovic, Jasna ^b   Lawson, Rebecca ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 82455206182     PISSN: 03010066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/p6974     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anstis S M, Atkinson J, 1967 "Distortions in moving figures viewed through a stationary slit" American Journal of Psychology 80 572-585
2. Craddock M, Lawson R, 2008 "Repetition priming and the haptic recognition of familiar and unfamiliar objects" Perception & Psychophysics 70 1350-1365; doi:10.3758/PP.70.7.1350
3. D'Angiulli A, Kennedy J M, Heller M A, 1998 "Blind children recognizing tactile pictures respond like sighted children given guidance in exploration" Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 39187-190
4. Gibson J J, 1962 "Observations on active touch" Psychological Review 69 477-491
5. Girgus J S, Gellman L H, Hochberg J, 1980 "The effect of spatial order on piecemeal shape recognition: A developmental study" Perception & Psychophysics 28 133-138
6. Haber R N, Nathanson L S, 1968 "Post-retinal storage? Some further observations on Parks' camel as seen through the eye of a needle" Perception & Psychophysics 3 349-355
7. Harman K L, Humphrey G K, Goodale M A, 1999 "Active manual control of object views facilitates visual recognition" Current Biology 9 1315-1318
8. Hochberg J, 2007 [1968] "In the mind's eye", in In the Mind's Eye: Julian Hochberg on the Perception of Pictures, Films, and theWorld Eds M A Peterson, B Gillam, H A Sedgwick (Cary, NC: Oxford University Press)
9. Itti L, Koch C, 2000 "A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of attention" Vision Research 40 1489-1506
10. James K H, Humphrey G K, Goodale M A, 2001 "Manipulating and recognizing virtual objects: Where the action is" Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 113-122
11. James K H, Humphrey G K, Vilis T, Baddour R, Corrie B, Goodale M A, 2002 "Learning three-dimensional structure: A virtual reality study" Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 34 383-390
12. Klatzky R L, Lederman S J, Metzger V A, 1985 "Identifying objects by touch: an 'expert system' " Perception & Psychophysics 37 299-302
13. Kröliczak G, Goodale M A, Humphrey G K, 2003 "The effects of different aperture-viewing conditions on the recognition of novel objects" Perception 32 1169-1179
14. Lawson R, Bracken S, 2011 "Haptic object recognition: How important are depth cues" Perception 40 576-597
15. Lederman S J, Klatzky R L, 1987 "Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition" Cognitive Psychology 19 342-368, doi:10.1016/0010-0285(87)90008-9
16. Loomis J M, Klatzky R L, Lederman S J, 1991 "Similarity of tactual and visual picture recogni-tion with limited field of view" Perception 29 167-177
17. Magee L E, Kennedy J M, 1980 "Exploring pictures tactually" Nature 283 287-288
18. Morgan M J, Findlay J M, Watt R J, 1982 "Aperture viewing: A review and synthesis" Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 34 211-233
19. Parks T E, 1965 "Post-retinal visual storage" American Journal of Psychology 78 145-147
20. Richardson B L, Wuillemin D B, MacKintosh G J, 1981 "Can passive touch be better than active touch? A comparison of active and passive tactile maze learning" British Journal of Psychology 72 353-362
21. Rock I, 1981 "Anorthoscopic perception" Scientific American 244 145-153
22. Symmons M A, Richardson B L, Wuillemin D B, 2004 "Active versus passive touch: Superiority depends more on the task than the mode", in Touch, Blindness, and Neuroscience Eds S Ballesteros, M Heller (Madrid: Universidad Nacional de Educaciön a Distancia) pp 179-185
23. Vrins S, de Wit T C J, Lier R van, 2009 "Bricks, butter, and slices of cucumber: Investigating semantic influences in amodal completion" Perception 38 17-29