Utility of second-look ultrasound in the evaluation of MRI-detected breast lesions

Seminars in Roentgenology

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 260-274

  Leung, Jessica W T ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CYST; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST LESION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SECOND LOOK ULTRASOUND;

BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 82455192610     PISSN: 0037198X     EISSN: 15584658     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.ro.2011.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Bassett L.W., Dhaliwal S.G., Eradat J., et al. National trends and practices in breast MRI. Am J Roentgenol 2008, 191:332-339.
2. Saslow D., Boetes C., Burke W., et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007, 57:75-89.
3. Lee C.H., Dershaw D.D., Kopans D., et al. Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 2010, 7:18-27.
4. ACR practice guideline for the performance of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast. Available at: Accessed September 23, 2011. http://www.acr.org/secondarymainmenucategories/quality_safety/guidelines/breast/mri_breast.aspx.
5. ACR breast MRI accreditation program. Available at: Accessed September 23, 2011. http://www.acr.org/accreditation/Breast-MRI.aspx.
6. ACR mammography accreditation program. Available at: Accessed September 23, 2011. http://www.acr.org/accreditation/mammography.aspx.
7. ACR breast ultrasound accreditation program. Available at: Accessed September 23, 2011. http://www.acr.org/accreditation/breast.aspx.
8. Kaiser W.A. Breast magnetic resonance imaging: principles and techniques. Semin Roentgenol 2007, 42:228-235.
9. Kuhl C. The current status of breast MR imaging. Part 1: Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice. Radiology 2007, 244:356-378.
10. Kuhl C.K. Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2: Clinical applications. Radiology 2007, 244:672-691.
11. Lehman C.D., Isaacs C., Schnall M.D., et al. Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: Prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study. Radiology 2007, 244:381-388.
12. Kuhl C., Weigel S., Schrading S., et al. Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: The EVA trial. J Clin Oncol 2010, 28:1450-1457.
13. Orel S.G., Schnall M.D. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 2001, 220:13-30.
14. Khatri V.P., Stuppino J.J., Espinosa M.H., et al. Improved accuracy in differentiating malignant from benign mammographic abnormalities: a simple, improved magnetic resonance imaging method. Cancer 2001, 92:471-478.
15. Nunes L.W., Schnall M.D., Orel S.G. Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model. Radiology 2001, 219:484-494.
16. Schnall M.D., Blume J., Bluemke D.A., et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: Multicenter study. Radiology 2006, 238:42-53.
17. Orel S.G., Schnall M.D., Newman R.W., et al. MR imaging-guided localization and biopsy of breast lesions: Initial experience. Radiology 1994, 193:97-102.
18. Heywang-Kobrunner S.H., Heinig A., Schaumloffel-Schulze U., et al. MR-guided percutaneous excisional and incisional biopsy of breast lesions. Eur Radiol 1999, 8:1656-1665.
19. Schneider E., Rohling K.W., Schnall M.D., et al. An apparatus for MR-guided breast lesion localization and core biopsy: Design and preliminary results. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001, 14:243-253.
20. Morris E.A., Liberman L., Dershaw D.D., et al. Preoperative MR imaging-guided needle localization of breast lesions. Am J Roentgenol 2002, 178:1211-1220.
21. Lo L.D., Orel S.G., Schnall M.D. MR: Imaging-guided interventions in the breast. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2001, 9:373-380.
22. Helbich T.H. Localization and biopsy of breast lesions by magnetic resonance imaging guidance. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001, 13:903-911.
23. Kuhl C.K., Morakkabati N., Leutner C.C., et al. MR imaging-guided large-core (14-gauge) needle biopsy of small lesions visible at breast MR imaging alone. Radiology 2001, 220:31-39.
24. Schneider J.P., Schulz T., Horn L.C., et al. MR-guided percutaneous core biopsy of small breast lesions: First experience with a vertically open 0.5T scanner. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002, 15:374-385.
25. Chen X., Lehman C.D., Dee K.E. MRI-guided breast biopsy: clinical experience with 14-gauge stainless steel core biopsy needle. Am J Roentgenol 2004, 182:1075-1080.
26. Liberman L., Bracero N., Morris E., et al. MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: Initial clinical experience. Am J Roentgenol 2005, 185:183-193.
27. Lehman C.D., DePeri E.R., Peacock S., et al. Clinical experience with MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Am J Roentgenol 2005, 184:1782-1787.
28. Veltman J., Boetes C., Wobbes T., et al. Magnetic resonance-guided biopsies and localizations of the breast: Initial experience using an open breast coil and compatible intervention device. Invest Radiol 2005, 40:379-384.
29. van den Bosch M.A., Daniel B.L., Pal S., et al. MRI-guided needle localization of suspicious breast lesions: Results of a freehand technique. Eur Radiol 2006, 16:1811-1817.
30. van de Ven S.M., Lin M.C., Daniel B.L., et al. Freehand MRI-guided preoperative needle localization of breast lesions after MRI-guided vacuum-assisted core needle biopsy without marker placement. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010, 32:101-109.
31. Schrading S., Simon B., Braun M., et al. MRI-guided breast biopsy: Influence of choice of vacuum biopsy system on the mode of biopsy of MRI-only suspicious breast lesions. Am J Roentgenol 2010, 194:1650-1657.
32. Peters N.H., Meeuwis C., Bakker C.J., et al. Feasibility of MRI-guided large-core-needle biopsy of suspicious breast lesions at 3T. Eur Radiol 2009, 19:1639-1644.
33. Meeuwis C., Mann R.M., Mus R.D., et al. MRI-guided breast biopsy at 3T using a dedicated large core biopsy set: Feasibility and initial results. Eur J Radiol 2011, 79:257-261.
34. Carbognin G., Girardi V., Brandalise A., et al. MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in the management of incidental enhancing lesions detected by breast MR imaging. Radiol Med 2011 Feb. 1, [Epub ahead of print].
35. Carbognin G, Girardi V, Brandalise A, et al: MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in the management of incidental enhancing lesions detected by breast MR imaging. Radiol Med 2011 Feb. 1 [Epub ahead of print].
36. Liberman L. Percutaneous image-guided core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am 2002, 40:483-500.
37. Liberman L. Clinical management issues in percutaneous core breast biopsy. Radiol Clin North Am 2000, 38:791-807.
38. Philpotts L.E. Controversies in core-needle breast biopsy. Semin Roentgenol 2001, 36:270-283.
39. Trop I., Labelle M., David J., et al. Second-look targeted studies after breast magnetic resonance imaging: Practical tips to improve lesion identification. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2010, 39:200-211.
40. Hambly N.M., Liberman L., Dershaw D.D., et al. Background parenchymal enhancement on baseline screening breast MRI: Impact on biopsy rate and short-interval follow-up. Am J Roentgenol 2011, 196. 218214.
41. DeMartini W.B., Eby P.R., Peacock S., et al. Utility of targeted sonography for breast lesions that were suspicious on MRI. Am J Roentgenol 2009, 192:1128-1134.
42. Berg W.A., Blume J.D., Cormack J.B., et al. Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: Lesion detection and characterization. Radiology 2006, 241:355-365.
43. Abe H., Schmidt R.A., Shah R.N., et al. MR-directed ("second-look") ultrasound examination for breast lesions detected initially on MRI: MR and sonographic findings. Am J Roentgenol 2010, 194:370-377.
44. ACR BI-RADS: Magnetic resonance imaging, in ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: Breast Imaging Atlas 2003, American College of Radiology, American College of Radiology, Reston, VA.
45. Lilienstein J., Daniel B.L., Ikeda D.M. In vivo sonography through an open MRI breast coil to correlate sonographic and MRI findings. Am J Roentgenol 2005, 184(suppl 3):S49-S52.
46. Teifke A., Lehr H.A., Vomweg T.W., et al. Outcome analysis and rational management of enhancing lesions incidentally detected on contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. Am J Roentgenol 2003, 181:655-662.
47. Ojeda-Fournier H., Choe K.A., Mahoney M.C. Recognizing and interpreting artifacts and pitfalls in MR imaging of the breast. Radiographics 2007, 27(suppl 1):S147-S164.
48. Meissnitzer M., Dershaw D.D., Lee C.H., et al. Targeted ultrasound of the breast in women with abnormal MRI findings for whom biopsy has been recommended. Am J Roentgenol 2009, 193:1025-1029.
49. Genson C.C., Blane C.E., Helvie M.A., et al. Effects on breast MRI of artifacts caused by metallic tissue marker clips. Am J Roentgenol 2007, 188:372-376.
50. Harvey J.A., Hendrick R.E., Coll J.M., et al. Breast MR imaging artifacts: How to recognize and fix them. Radiographics 2007, 27(suppl 1):S131-S145.
51. Lee C.H., Philpotts L.E., Horvath L.J., et al. Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: Frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate. Radiology 1999, 212:189-194.
52. Margolin F.R., Leung J.W., Jacobs R.P., et al. Percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy: 5 years' experience in a community hospital. Am J Roentgenol 2001, 177:559-564.
53. LaTrenta L.R., Menell J.H., Morris E.A., et al. Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: Utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US. Radiology 2003, 227:856-861.
54. Sim L.S., Hendriks J.H., Bult P., et al. US correlation for MRI-detected breast lesions in women with familial risk of breast cancer. Clin Radiol 2005, 60:801-806.
55. Beran L., Liang W., Nims T., et al. Correlation of targeted ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities of the breast. Am J Surg 2005, 190:592-594.
56. Shin J.H., Han B.K., Choe Y.H., et al. Targeted ultrasound for MR-detected lesions in breast cancer patients. Korean J Radiol 2007, 8:475-483.
57. Linda A., Zuiani C., Londero V., et al. Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammography-detected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: Distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size. Breast 2008, 17:51-57.
58. Wiratkapun C., Duke D., Nordmann A.S., et al. Indeterminate or suspicious breast lesions detected initially with MR imaging: Value of MRI-directed breast ultrasound. Acad Radiol 2008, 15:618-625.
59. Destounis S., Arieno A., Somerville P.A., et al. Community-based practice experience of unsuspected breast magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities evaluated with second-look sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2009, 28:1337-1346.
60. Carbognin G., Girardi V., Calciolari C., et al. Utility of second-look ultrasound in the management of incidental enhancing lesions detected by breast MR imaging. Radiol Med 2010, 115:1234-1245.
61. Candelaria R., Fornage B.D. Second-look US examination of MR-detected breast lesions. J Clin Ultrasound 2011, 39:115-121.
62. Luciani ML, Pediconi F, Telesca M, et al: Incidental enhancing lesions found on preoperative breast MRI: Management and role of second-look ultrasound. Radiol Med (in press).
63. Hashimoto B.E., Morgan G.N., Kramer D.J., et al. Systematic approach to difficult problems in breast sonography. Ultrasound Q 2008, 24:31-38.
64. Swayampakula A.K., Dillis C., Abraham J. Role of MRI in screening, diagnosis and management of breast cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2008, 8:811-817.
65. Stavros A.T., Thickman D., Rapp C.L., et al. Solid breast nodules: Use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995, 196:123-134.
66. Raza S., Chikarmane S.A., Neilsen S.S., et al. BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions: Value of US in management-Follow-up and outcome. Radiology 2008, 248:773-781.
67. Hashimoto B.E. Sonographic assessment of breast calcifications. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2006, 35:213-218.
68. Leung J.W., Sickles E.A. The probably benign assessment. Radiol Clin North Am 2007, 45:773-789.
69. Sickles E.A. Probably benign breast lesions: When should follow-up be recommended and what is the optimal follow-up protocol?. Radiology 1999, 213:11-14.
70. Sickles E.A. Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: Results in 3,184 consecutive cases. Radiology 1991, 179:463-468.
71. Lee J.M., Kaplan J.B., Murray M.P., et al. Underestimation of DCIS at MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Am J Roentgenol 2007, 189:468-474.
72. Liberman L., Holland A.E., Marjan D., et al. Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Am J Roentgenol 2007, 188:684-690.
73. Crystal P., Sadaf A., Bukhanov K., et al. High-risk lesions diagnosed at MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: Can underestimation be predicted?. Eur Radiol 2011, 21:582-589.
74. Li J., Dershaw D.D., Lee C.H., et al. MRI follow-up after concordant, histologically benign diagnosis of breast lesions sampled by MRI-guided biopsy. Am J Roetgenol 2009, 193:850-855.
75. Liberman L., Morris E.A., Benton C.L., et al. Probably benign lesions at breast magnetic resonance imaging: Preliminary experience in high-risk women. Cancer 2003, 98:377-388.
76. Sadowski E.A., Kelcz F. Frequency of malignancy in lesions classified as probably benign after dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI examination. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005, 21:556-564.
77. Eby P.R., DeMartini W.B., Gutierrez R.L., et al. Probably benign lesions detected on breast MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2010, 18:309-321.
78. Eby P.R., DeMartini W.B., Gutierrez R.L., et al. Characteristics of probably benign breast MRI lesions. Am J Roentgenol 2009, 193:861-867.
79. Weinstein S.P., Hanna L.G., Gatsonis C., et al. Frequency of malignancy seen in probably benign lesions at contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Findings from ACRIN 6667. Radiology 2010, 255:731-737.
80. Elshof L.E., Rutgers E.J., Deurloo E.E., et al. A practical approach to manage additional lesions at preoperative breast MRI in patients eligible for breast conserving therapy: Results. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010, 124:707-715.