Feasibility of MRI-guided large-core-needle biopsy of suspiscious breast lesions at 3T

European Radiology

Volumn 19, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1639-1644

  Peters, Nicky H G M ^a   Meeuwis, Carla ^b   Bakker, Chris J G ^a   Mali, Willem P Th M ^a   Fernandez Gallardo, Arancha M ^a   Hillegersberg, Richard ^a   Schipper, Marguerite E I ^a   Bosch, Maurice A A J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b RIJNSTATE HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Breast neoplasms; High field; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; BREAST ADENOCARCINOMA; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST LESION; BREAST PAPILLOMA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ECHOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; LARGE CORE NEEDLE BIOPSY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAFETY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 67349130097     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1310-0     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS et al (2004) Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 233:830-849
2. Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH et al (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA 292:2735-2742
3. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E (1999) Breast carcinoma: Effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 213:881-888
4. Malur S, Wurdinger S, Moritz A, Michels W, Schneider A (2001) Comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography. Breast Cancer Res 3:55-60
5. Smith LF, Henry-Tillman R, Mancino AT et al (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging-guided core needle biopsy and needle localized excision of occult breast lesions. Am J Surg 182:414-418
6. Helbich TH (2001) Localization and biopsy of breast lesions by magnetic resonance imaging guidance. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:903-911
7. Liberman L, Fahs MC, Dershaw DD et al (1995) Impact of stereotaxic core breast biopsy on cost of diagnosis. Radiology 195:633-637
8. Kuhl CK, Morakkabati N, Leutner CC, Schmiedel A, Wardelmann E, Schild HH (2001) MR imaging-guided large-core (14-gauge) needle biopsy of small lesions visible at breast MR imaging alone. Radiology 220:31-39
9. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E (1998) Magnetic resonance guided localization and biopsy of suspicious breast lesions. Top Magn Reson Imaging 9:44-59
10. van den Bosch MA, Daniel BL, Pal S et al (2006) MRI-guided needle localization of suspicious breast lesions: Results of a freehand technique. Eur Radiol 16:1811-1817
11. Kuhl CK, Jost P, Morakkabati N, Zivanovic O, Schild HH, Gieseke J (2006) Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast at 3.0 and 1.5 T in the same patients: Initial experience. Radiology 239:666-676
12. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Rosen PP, Abramson AF, Deutch BM, Hann LE (1994) Stereotaxic 14-gauge breast biopsy: How many core biopsy specimens are needed? Radiology 192:793-795