Effects on breast MRI of artifacts caused by metallic tissue marker clips

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 188, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 372-376

  Genson, Charles C ^a   Blane, Caroline E ^a   Helvie, Mark A ^a   Waits, Seth A ^a   Chenevert, Thomas L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

Artifact; Breast; Breast cancer; MRI; Tissue marker clips

Indexed keywords

GADODIAMIDE; GADOLINIUM; GELATIN; MARKER; METAL;

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DISEASE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLIP; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPECTROSCOPY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ARTIFACTS; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; METALS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33846539740     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.1254     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 2001; 220:13-30
2. Kuhl CK, Morakkabati N, Leutner CC, Schmiedel A, Wardelmann E, Schild HH. MR imaging-guided large-core (14-gauge) needle biopsy of small lesions visible at breast MR imaging alone. Radiology 2001; 220:31-39
3. Rosen EL, Vo TT. Metallic clip deployment during stereotactic breast biopsy: retrospective analysis. Radiology 2001; 218:510-516
4. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 1999; 213:881-888
5. Morris EA, Liberman L, Dershaw DD, et al. Preoperative MR imaging-guided needle localization of breast lesions. AJR 2002; 178:1211-1220
6. Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK. MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer. AJR 2003; 180:901-910
7. Philpotts LE, Lee CH. Clip migration after 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy: case report. Radiology 2002; 222:794-796
8. Whaley DH, Adamczyk DL, Jensen EA. Sonographically guided needle localization after stereotactic breast biopsy. AJR 2003; 180:352-354
9. Lehman CD, Eby PR, Chen X, Dee KE, Thursten B, McCloskey J. MR imaging-guided breast biopsy using a coaxial technique with a 14-gauge stainless steel core biopsy needle and a titanium sheath. AJR 2003; 181:183-185
10. Warren R, Kessar P. A method of coil localization for breast lesions seen only on MRI. Br J Radiol 2001; 74:548-551
11. Esserman L, Hylton N, Yassa L, Barclay J, Frankel S, Sickles E. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17:110-119
12. Shellock FG. Metallic marking clips used after stereotactic breast biopsy: ex vivo testing of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts associated with MR imaging. AJR 1999; 172:1417-1419
13. Artemis Medical. Ethicon Endo-Surgery Web site. Available at: www.artemismedical.com. Accessed April 1, 2004
14. SenoRx product catalog. SenoRx Web site. Available at: www.senorx.com/products/product_catalog/index.asp. Accessed April 1, 2004
15. Mammotome product information. Ethicon Endo-Surgery Web site. Available at: www.jnjgateway.com/home.jhtml?loc=USENG&page=viewContent&contentId= 09008b98806422dd&parentId=09008b 9880641f90. Accessed April 1, 2004
16. INRAD product information. INRAD Web site. Available at: www.inrad-inc.com/main.htm. Accessed April 1, 2004
17. Hug J, Nagel E, Bornstedt A, Schnackenburg B, Oswald H, Fleck E. Coronary arterial stents: safety and artifacts during MR imaging. Radiology 2000; 216:781-787
18. Weishaupt D, Quick HH, Nanz D, Schmidt M, Cassina PC, Debatin JF. Ligating clips for three-dimensional MR angiography at 1.5 T: in vitro evaluation. Radiology 2000; 214:902-907
19. White LM, Kim JK, Mehta M, et al. Complications of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging-initial experience. Radiology 2000; 215:254-262
20. Jones RW, Witte RJ. Signal intensity artifacts in clinical MR imaging. RadioGraphics 2000; 20:893-901
21. Teitelbaum GP, Bradley WG Jr, Klein BD. MR imaging artifacts, ferromagnetism, and magnetic torque of intravascular filters, stents, and coils. Radiology 1988; 166:657-664
22. Matsuura H, Takashi I, Konno H, et al. Quantification of susceptibility artifacts produced on high-field magnetic resonance images by various biomaterials used for neurosurgical implants. J Neurosurg 2002; 97:1472-1475
23. Lee JM, Orel SG, Czerniecki BJ, Solin LJ, Schnall MD. MRI before reexcision surgery in patients with breast cancer. AJR 2004; 182:473-480
24. Yeung DK, Yang WT, Tse GM. Breast cancer: in vivo proton MR spectroscopy in the characterization of histopathologic subtypes and preliminary observations in axillary node metastases. Radiology 2002; 225:190-197
25. Yeung DK, Cheung HS, Tse GM. Human breast lesions: characterization with contrast-enhanced in vivo proton MR spectroscopy-initial results. Radiology 2001; 220:40-46
26. Katz-Brull R, Lavin PT, Lenkinski RE. Clinical utility of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in characterizing breast lesions. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94:1197-1203
27. Burtscher IM, Holtas S. Proton MR spectroscopy in clinical routine. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 13:560-567
28. Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes JC, et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:427-437
29. Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA, et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 2004; 292:1317-1324