Pluralism, heterodoxy, and the rhetoric of distinction

Review of Radical Political Economics

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 552-561

  Mearman, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

dualism; heterodoxy; pluralism; rhetoric

Indexed keywords

EID: 82455186472     PISSN: 04866134     EISSN: 15528502     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0486613411402644     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bhaskar R.Scientific realism and human emancipation. London: Verso; 1986:.
2. Blyth E.An attempt to classify the 'varieties' of animals, with observations on the marked seasonal and other changes which naturally take place in various British species, and which do not constitute varieties.Magazine of Natural History. 1835;8:40-53.
3. Bowker G.,Star S.Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999:.
4. Brew A.The nature of research: Inquiry in academic contexts. London: Routledge; 2001:.
5. Colander D.,Holt R.,Rosser J. B.The changing face of mainstream economics.Review of Political Economy. 2004;16 (October): 485-99.
6. Davidson P.Responses to Lavoie, King and Dow on what post Keynesianism is and who is a post Keynesian.Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. 2005;27 (3): 393-408.
7. Davis J. The nature of heterodox economics. Ontology and economics: Tony Lawson and his critics. Fullbrook E., ed. London: Routledge; 2009:.
8. Dequech D.Neoclassical, mainstream, orthodox, and heterodox economics.Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. 2007;30 (2): 279-302.
9. Dow S.Beyond dualism.Cambridge Journal of Economics. 1990;14:1434-58.
10. Dow S.The methodology of macroeconomic thought. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar; 1996:.
11. Dow S.Prospects for progress in heterodox economics.Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 2000;22 (2): 157-70.
12. Dow S.Structured pluralism.Journal of Economic Methodology. 2004;11 (3): 275-90.
13. Freeman A.,Kliman A.Critical pluralism. Paper presented to the Association for Heterodox Economics conference; 2005London; 2005.
14. Garnett R.Paradigms and pluralism in heterodox economics.Review of Political Economy. 2006;18 (4): 521-46.
15. Harcourt G.Some Cambridge controversies in the theory of capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1972:.
16. Heilbroner R.Analysis and vision in the history of modern economic thought.Journal of Economic Literature. 1990;28 (September): 1097-114.
17. Hey J.On the failure of modern species concepts.Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2006;21 (8): 447-50.
18. Holcombe R.Pluralism versus heterodoxy in economics and the social sciences.Journal of Philosophical Economics. 2008;1 (2): 51-72.
19. King J.A history of post Keynesian economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2002:.
20. Kliman A.Veneziani's critique of Marx and the TSSI. Paper presented to the Association for Heterodox Economics conference; 2006;.
21. Kuhn T.The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1962:.
22. Lavoie M.Changing definitions: A comment on Davidson's critique of King's History of post Keynesianism.Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. 2005;27 (3): 371-6.
23. Lavoie M.Do heterodox theories have anything in common? A post-Keynesian point of view.Intervention. Journal of Economics. 2006;3 (1): 87-112.
24. Lawson T.Economics and reality. London: Routledge; 1997:.
25. Lawson T.Reorienting economics. London: Routledge; 2003:.
26. Lawson T.The nature of heterodox economics.Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2006;30:483-504.
27. Lee F.Association for Heterodox Economics: Past, present and future.Journal of Australian Political Economy. 2002;50 (December): 29-43.
28. Lee F.Introduction to the special issue.Review of Radical Political Economics. 2006;38 (December): 497-8.
29. Lee F.The pluralism debate in heterodox economics.Review of Radical Political Economics. 2011;43 (4): 540-51.
30. LeeF.2009. Challenging the mainstream: Essays on the history of heterodox economics in the twentieth century. New York: Routledge, forthcoming. Appendix available at http://www.heterodoxnews.com/APPENDIX--formatted.pdf.
31. Linenthal E.The contested landscape of American memorialisation: Levison's.Written in stone. Law and Social Inquiry. 2000;25 (1): 249-62.
32. Livingstone. Human acclimatization: Perspectives on a contested field of inquiry in science, medicine and geography.History of Science. 1987;25 (70): 359-94.
33. Malik K.Strange fruit: Why both sides are wrong in the race debate. London: Oneworld; 2008:.
34. Mayr E.Principles of systematic zoology. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1969:.
35. McCloskey D.The rhetoric of economics.Journal of Economic Literature. 1983;21 (June): 481-517.
36. McCloskey D.Knowledge and persuasion in economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1994:.
37. Mearman A.Sheila Dow's concept of dualism: Clarification, criticism and development.Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2005;29 (4): 619-34.
38. Mearman A.Handbook for Economics Lecturers. Bristol, UK: Economics Network; 2007:.
39. Mearman A.Pluralism and heterodoxy: Introduction to the special issue.Journal of Philosophical Economics. 2008;1 (2): 5-25.
40. Moseley F.Introduction: Debate over microeconomics.Review of Radical Political Economics. 2008;40 (September): 315-16.
41. Murphy J.Learning from the past: A small quibble with Fred Lee's history of American radical economics.Review of Radical Political Economics. 2007;39 (March): 108-15.
42. Potts J.The new evolutionary microeconomics: Complexity, competence and adaptive behaviour. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2000:.
43. Pluralism in economics. Salanti A.Screpanti E., ed. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 1997:.
44. Veneziani R.Analytical Marxism. Paper presented to the Association for Heterodox Economics conference;;.
45. Wrenn M.What is heterodox economics? Conversations with historians of economic thought.Forum for Social Economics. 2007;36:97-108.