Video medical interpretation over 3G cellular networks: A feasibility study

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 17, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 809-813

  Locatis, Craig ^a   Williamson, Deborah ^b   Sterrett, James ^b   Detzler, Isabel ^b   Ackerman, Michael ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

pharmacy; technology; telecommunication; telemedicine

Indexed keywords

3G CELLULAR NETWORKS; CELL PHONE; CELL PHONE SERVICE; CELLULAR COMMUNICATION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; PHARMACY; TELECOMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; VIDEO PRODUCTS; VIDEO QUALITY;

BANDWIDTH; CELLULAR NEURAL NETWORKS; CELLULAR TELEPHONE SYSTEMS; MOBILE PHONES; QUALITY OF SERVICE; TECHNOLOGY; TELECOMMUNICATION; TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT; TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; TELEMEDICINE; TELEPHONE SETS; VIDEO CONFERENCING;

TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MOBILE PHONE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT REFERRAL; PHARMACY; STATISTICS; TELEMEDICINE; UNITED STATES; VIDEOCONFERENCING;

CELLULAR PHONE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; PHARMACIES; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; SOUTH CAROLINA; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; TELEMEDICINE; VIDEOCONFERENCING;

EID: 82455179519     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: 15563669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0084     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Karliner L, Jacobs E, Chen A, Mutha S. Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature. Health Serv Res 2007;42:727-754. (Pubitemid 46398784)
2. Flores G. The impact of medical interpreter services on the quality of health care: A systematic review. Med Care Res Rev 2005;62:255-299. (Pubitemid 40664427)
3. Azarmina P, Wallace P. Remote interpretation in medical encounters: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11:140-145. (Pubitemid 40694632)
4. Office of Minority Health. National standards for culturally and linguistically appropriate services in health care: Final Report. Washington: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Available at www.omhrc.gov/assets/pdf/checked/finalreport.pdf (last accessed September 28, 2011).
5. Jones D, Gill P, Harrison R, Meakin R, Wallace P. An exploratory study of language interpretation services provided by videoconferencing. J Telemed Telecare 2003;9:51-56. (Pubitemid 39655044)
6. Paras M, Leyva O, Berthold T, Otake R. Videoconferencing medical interpretation: The results of clinical trials. Oakland, California: Health Access Foundation, 2002.
7. Hornberger J, Gibson C, Wood W, Dequeldre C, Corso I, Palla B, Bloch D. Eliminating language barriers for non-English-speaking patients. Med Care 1996;34:845-856. (Pubitemid 126433276)
8. Saint-Louis L, Friedman E, Chiasson E, Quessa A, Novaes F. Testing new technologies in medical interpreting. Somerville, Massachusetts: Cambridge Health Alliance, 2003.
9. Locatis C, Williamson D, Gould-Kabler C, Zone-Smith L, Detzler I, Roberson J, Maisiak R, Ackerman MJ. Comparing in-person, video, and telephonic medical interpretation. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25:345-350.
10. Sterrett J, Williamson D, Pope C, Dumas B. The Hispanic health initiative. Grant Appropriation 5395-SP, The Duke Endowment.