An image space approach to Cartesian based parallel MR imaging with total variation regularization

Medical Image Analysis

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 189-200

  Keeling, Stephen L ^a   Clason, Christian ^a   Hintermüller, Michael ^b   Knoll, Florian ^c   Laurain, Antoine ^b   von Winckel, Gregory ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Aliasing correction; Bilinear residual; Cartesian parallel magnetic resonance imaging; Primal dual; Total variation regularization

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE APPROACH; BILINEAR RESIDUAL; CARTESIANS; COIL SENSITIVITY; COMPUTATIONAL RESULTS; CONVEX ANALYSIS; GAUSS-SEIDEL; GENERALIZED NEWTON; HIGH-ORDER; IMAGE SPACE; IN-VIVO; MAGNETIC IMAGING; MR IMAGING; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; OPTIMALITY CONDITIONS; OPTIMALITY SYSTEM; OUTER ITERATION; PRIMAL-DUAL; PRIMAL-DUAL SYSTEMS; RECONSTRUCTED IMAGE; RECONSTRUCTION QUALITY; REGULARIZATION METHODS; TOTAL VARIATION; TOTAL VARIATION REGULARIZATION;

OPTIMIZATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CARTESIAN BASED PARALLEL NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IN VIVO STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 82355185857     PISSN: 13618415     EISSN: 13618423     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2011.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aubert G., Kornprobst P. Mathematical Problems in Image Processing. Applied Mathematical Sciences 2006, vol. 147, second ed.. Springer, New York.
2. Aujol J., Chambolle A. Dual norms and image decomposition models. Int. J. Comput. Vision 2005, 63:85-104.
3. Bammer R., Schoenberg S.O. Current concepts and advances in clinical parallel magnetic resonance imaging. Top. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2004, 15:129-158.
4. Bernstein M.A., King K.F., Zhou X.J. Handbook of MRI Pulse Sequences 2004, Academic Press.
5. Blaimer M., Breuer F., Mueller M., Heidemann R.M., Griswold M.A., Jakob P.M. SMASH, SENSE, PILS, GRAPPA: how to choose the optimal method. Top. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2004, 15:223-236.
6. Block K.T., Uecker M., Frahm J. Undersampled radial MRI with multiple coils. Iterative image reconstruction using a total variation constraint. Magn. Reson. Med. 2007, 57:1086-1098.
7. Bredies K., Kunisch K., Pock T. Total generalized variation. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 2010, 3:492-526.
8. Chan T.F., Golub G.H., Mulet P. A nonlinear primal-dual method for total variation-based image restoration. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 1999, 20:1964-1977.
9. Clason C., von Winckel G. On a bilinear optimization problem in parallel magnetic resonance imaging. Appl. Math. Comput. 2010, 216:1443-1452.
10. Ekeland I., Témam R. Convex Analysis and Variational Problems. Classics in Applied Mathematics 1999, vol. 28, English ed.. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA.
11. Evans L.C. Partial Differential Equations. Graduate Studies in Mathematics 2010, vol. 19, second ed.. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.
12. Fessler J. Model-based image reconstruction for MRI. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2010, 27:81-89.
13. Golub G.H., Van Loan C.F. Matrix Computations. Johns Hopkins Studies in the Mathematical Sciences 1996, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD. third ed.
14. Griswold M.A., Jakob P.M., Heidemann R.M., Nittka M., Jellus V., Wang J., Kiefer B., Haase A. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn. Reson. Med. 2002, 47:1202-1210.
15. Heidemann R.M., Ozsarlak O., Parizel P.M., Michiels J., Kiefer B., Jellus V., Mnller M., Breuer F., Blaimer M., Griswold M.A., Jakob P.M. A brief review of parallel magnetic resonance imaging. Eur. Radiol. 2003, 13:2323-2337.
16. Hintermüller M., Kunisch K. Total bounded variation regularization as a bilaterally constrained optimization problem. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 2004, 64:1311-1333.
17. Hintermüller M., Laurain A. Multiphase image segmentation and modulation recovery based on shape and topological sensitivity. J. Math. Imaging Vision 2009, 35:1-22.
18. Hintermüller M., Stadler G. An infeasible primal-dual algorithm for total bounded variation-based inf-convolution-type image restoration. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 2006, 28:1-23.
19. Hintermüller, M., Keeling, S.L., Laurain, A., 2008. Modulation Recovery and Image Reconstruction in MRI: A Structural Study by Parameterization. Technical Report 2008-023. MOBIS.
20. Keeling S.L. Total variation based convex filters for medical imaging. Appl. Math. Comput. 2003, 139:101-119.
21. Keeling S.L., Bammer R. A variational approach to magnetic resonance coil sensitivity estimation. Appl. Math. Comput. 2004, 158:359-388.
22. Keeling S.L., Haase G. Geometric multigrid for high-order regularizations of early vision problems. Appl. Math. Comput. 2007, 184:536-556.
23. Keeling S.L., Hintermnller M., Knoll F., Kraft D., Laurain A. A total variation based approach to correcting surface coil magnetic resonance images. Appl. Math. Comput. 2011, 218:219-232.
24. Knoll F., Bredies K., Pock T., Stollberger R. Second order total generalized variation (TGV) for MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2011, 65:480-491.
25. Larkman D.J., Nunes R.G. Parallel magnetic resonance imaging. Phys. Med. Biol. 2007, 52:R15-R55.
26. Liang D., Liu B., Wang J., Ying L. Accelerating SENSE using compressed sensing. Magn. Reson. Med. 2009, 62:1574-1584.
27. Liu, B., Ying, L., Steckner, M., Xie, J., Sheng, J., 2007. Regularized SENSE reconstruction using iteratively refined total variation method. In: Proc. 4th IEEE Int. Symp. Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro ISBI 2007, pp. 121-124.
28. Lustig M., Pauly J.M. SPIRiT: Iterative self-consistent parallel imaging reconstruction from arbitrary k-space. Magn. Reson. Med. 2010, 64:457-471.
29. Lustig M., Donoho D., Pauly J.M. Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 2007, 58:1182-1195.
30. Pruessmann K.P., Weiger M., Scheidegger M.B., Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 1999, 42:952-962.
31. Pruessmann K.P., Weiger M., Börnert P., Boesiger P. Advances in sensitivity encoding with arbitrary k-space trajectories. Magn. Reson. Med. 2001, 46:638-651.
32. Scherzer O., Grasmair M., Grossauer H., Haltmeier M., Lenzen F. Variational Methods in Imaging. Applied Mathematical Sciences 2009, vol. 167. Springer, New York.
33. Uecker M., Hohage T., Block K.T., Frahm J. Image reconstruction by regularized nonlinear inversion - joint estimation of coil sensitivities and image content. Magn. Reson. Med. 2008, 60:674-682.
34. Wang, J., Kluge, T., Nittka, M., Jellus, V., Kuehn, B., Kiefer, B., 2001. Parallel acquisition techniques with modified SENSE reconstruction mSENSE. In: Proceedings of the First Wurzburg Workshop on Parallel Imaging, p. 92.