Spatial econometrics approach to integration of behavioral biases in travel demand analysis

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2157, 2010, Pages 1-10

  Smirnov, Oleg A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; STATISTICS;

BEHAVIORAL BIAS; DECISION MAKERS; DISCRETE CHOICE; DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS; HERD BEHAVIORS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATOR; PEER PRESSURE; RANDOM UTILITY MODEL; SPATIAL ECONOMETRICS; TRAVEL DEMAND ANALYSIS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 78651314440     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2157-01     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bhat, C., and H. Zhao. The Spatial Analysis of Activity Stop Generation. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2002, pp. 557-575.
2. Bhat, C. R., and J. Guo. A Mixed Spatially Correlated Logit Model: Formulation and Application to Residential Choice Modeling. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2004, pp. 147-168.
3. Koppelman, F. S., and V. Sethi. Incorporating Variance and Covariance Heterogeneity in the Generalized Nested Logit Model: An Application to Modeling Long Distance Travel Choice Behavior. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 39, No. 9, 2005, pp. 825-853.
4. Louviere, J., K. Train, M. Ben-Akiva, C. Bhat, D. Brownstone, T. A. Cameron, R. T. Carson, J. R. Deshzo, D. Fiebig, W. Green, D. Hensher, and D. Waldman. Recent Progress on Endogeneity in Choice Modeling. Marketing Letters, Vol. 16, No. 3-4, 2005, pp. 255-265.
5. Mohammadian, A., M. Haider, and P. S. Kanaroglou. Incorporating Spatial Dependencies in Random Parameter Discrete Choice Models. Presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005.
6. Sivakumar, A., and C. R. Bhat. Comprehensive, Unified Framework for Analyzing Spatial Location Choice. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2003, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 103-111.
7. Bekhor, S., and J. N. Prashker. GEV-Based Destination Choice Models that Account for Unobserved Similarities Among Alternatives. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 42, No. 3, 2008, pp. 243-262.
8. Smirnov, O. A. Modeling Spatial Discrete Choice. Regional Science and Urban Economics (in press).
9. Anselin, L. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1988.
10. Kelejian, H. H., and D. P. Robinson. A Suggested Test for Spatial Autocorrelation and/or Heteroskedasticity and Corresponding Monte Carlo Results. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 28, No. 4, 1998, pp. 389-417.
11. McMillen, D. P. Probit with Spatial Autocorrelation. Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 32, No. 3, 1992, pp. 335-348.
12. Dugundji, E. R., and J. L. Walker. Discrete Choice with Social and Spatial Network Interdependencies: An Empirical Example Using Mixed Generalized Extreme Value Models with Field and Panel Effects. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1921, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 70-78.
13. Walker, J. L., and J. Li. Latent Lifestyle Preferences and Household Location Decisions. Journal of Geographical Systems, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2007, pp. 77-101.
14. Dugundji, E. R., and L. Gulyás. Sociodynamic Discrete Choice on Networks in Space: Impacts of Agent Heterogeneity on Emergent Outcomes. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, Vol. 35, No. 6, 2008, pp. 1028-1054.
15. McFadden, D. Modeling the Choice of Residential Location. In Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location (A. Karlqvist et al., eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1978, pp. 75-96.
16. Ben-Akiva, M. E., and S. R. Lerman. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press Series in Transportation Studies, Vol. 9, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985.
17. Train, K. E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulations. Cambridge University Press, New York, 2003.
18. Pesendorfer, W. Behavioral Economics Comes of Age: A Review Essay on Advances in Behavioral Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 44, Sept. 2006, pp. 712-721.
19. Bierlaire, M., D. Bolduc, and D. McFadden. The Estimation of Generalized Extreme Value Models from Choice-Based Samples. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2008, pp. 381-394.
20. Abraham, J. E., and J. D. Hunt. Random Utility Location, Production, and Exchange Choice; Additive Logit Model; and Spatial Choice Microsimulations. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2003, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 1-6.
21. Eluru, N., A. R. Pinjari, J. Y. Guo, I. N. Sener, S. Srinivasan, R. B. Copperman, and C. R. Bhat. Population Updating System Structures and Models Embedded in the Comprehensive Econometric Microsimulator for Urban Systems. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2076, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 171-182.
22. Zhang, K., H. S. Mahmassani, and C.-C. Lu. Probit-Based Time- Dependent Stochastic User Equilibrium Traffic Assignment Model. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2085, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 86-94.
23. Kim, J.-H., J.-H. Chung, I. Kim, and U. Lim. Spatial Dependence in Trip Generation Models: Spatial Econometric Perspective. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
24. Klier, T., and D. P. McMillen. Clustering of Auto Supplier Plants in the United States: Generalized Method of Moments Spatial Logit for Large Samples. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 460-471.
25. Bhat, C. R., and I. N. Sener. Copula-Based Closed-Form Binary Logit Choice Model for Accommodating Spatial Correlation Across Observational Units. Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2009.
26. Garrido, R. A., and M. Leva. Port of Destination and Carrier Selection for Fruit Exports: A Multi-dimensional Space-Time Multinomial Probit Model. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 38, No. 7, 2004, pp. 657-667.
27. Smirnov, O. A., and K. J. Egan. Spatial Random Utility Model with an Application to Recreation Demand. Department of Economics, University of Toledo, Ohio, 2009.
28. Graham, B. S. Identifying Social Interactions Through Conditional Variance Restrictions. Econometrica, Vol. 76, No. 3, 2008, pp. 643-660.
29. Hartmann,W. R., P. Manchanda, H. Nair, M. Bothner, P. Dodds, D. Godes, K. Hosanagar, and C. Tucker. Modeling Social Interactions: Identification, Empirical Methods and Policy Implications. Marketing Letters, Vol. 19, No. 3-4, 2008, pp. 287-304.
30. Smirnov, O. A., and L. E. Anselin. An O(N) Parallel Method of Computing the Log-Jacobian of the Variable Transformation for Models with Spatial Interaction on a Lattice. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, Vol. 53, No. 8, 2009, pp. 2980-2988.
31. Lee, L.-F. Asymptotic Distributions of Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimators for Spatial Autoregressive Models. Econometrica, Vol. 72, No. 6, 2004, pp. 1899-1925.
32. Anselin, L. Under the Hood: Issues in the Specification and Interpretation of Spatial Regression Models. Agricultural Economics, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2002, pp. 247-267.
33. Smirnov, O. Computation of the Information Matrix for the Models of Spatial Interaction on a Lattice. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2005, pp. 910-927.