Reconstruction of scattered data in fetal diffusion MRI

Medical Image Analysis

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 28-37

  Oubel, Estanislao ^a   Koob, Mériam ^b,d   Studholme, Colin ^c   Dietemann, Jean Louis ^b,d   Rousseau, François ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

^b Université de Strasbourg Faculté de Psychologie   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^d HÔPITAL DE HAUTEPIERRE   (France)

Author keywords

Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Distortion correction; Fetal brain; Image reconstruction; Image registration

Indexed keywords

DATA RECONSTRUCTION; DIFFUSION DOMAIN; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; DIFFUSION MODEL; DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MRI; DISTORTION CORRECTION; FRACTIONAL ANISOTROPY; LEAVE-ONE-OUT; OBJECTIVE CRITERIA; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTIONS; REGISTRATION METHODS; REGULAR GRIDS; SCATTERED DATA; TENSOR MODEL; TRACTOGRAPHY;

BRAIN; DIFFUSION; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGE REGISTRATION; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION NETWORKS;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BRAIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FETUS; FETUS MONITORING; FRACTIONAL ANISOTROPY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTRAVOXEL ORIENTATIONAL HETEROGENEITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTION; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; TRACTOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 82355182241     PISSN: 13618415     EISSN: 13618423     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2011.04.004     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Akazawa K., Yamada K., Matsushima S., Goto M., Yuen S., Nishimura T. Optimum b value for resolving crossing fibers: a study with standard clinical b value using 1.5-T MR. Neuroradiology 2010, 52(8):723-728.
2. Aksoy, M., Skare, S., Holdsworth, S., Bammer, R., 2010. Effects of motion and b-matrix correction for high resolution DTI with short-axis PROPELLER-EPI. NMR Biomed.
3. Andersson J.L.R., Skare S. A model-based method for retrospective correction of geometric distortions in diffusion-weighted EPI. Neuroimage 2002, 16(1):177-199.
4. Andersson J.L.R., Skare S., Ashburner J. How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage 2003, 20(2):870-888.
5. Anjari M., Srinivasan L., Allsop J.M., Hajnal J.V., Rutherford M.A., Edwards A.D., Counsell S.J. Diffusion tensor imaging with tract-based spatial statistics reveals local white matter abnormalities in preterm infants. Neuroimage 2007, 35(3):1021-1027.
6. Baldoli C., Righini A., Parazzini C., Scotti G., Triulzi F. Demonstration of acute ischemic lesions in the fetal brain by diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. Ann. Neurol. 2002, 52(2):243-246.
7. Bammer R., Keeling S.L., Augustin M., Pruessmann K.P., Wolf R., Stollberger R., Hartung H.P., Fazekas F. Improved diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI) in stroke using sensitivity encoding (SENSE). Magn. Reson. Med. 2001, 46(3):548-554.
8. Bui T., Daire J.-L., Chalard F., Zaccaria I., Alberti C., Elmaleh M., Garel C., Luton D., Blanc N., Sebag G. Microstructural development of human brain assessed in utero by diffusion tensor imaging. Pediatr. Radiol. 2006, 36(11):1133-1140.
9. Carfora M.F. Interpolation on spherical geodesic grids: a comparative study. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2007, 210(1-2):99-105.
10. Chen N.K., Wyrwicz A.M. Optimized distortion correction technique for echo planar imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 2001, 45(3):525-528.
11. Dubois J., Dehaene-Lambertz G., Soars C., Cointepas Y., Bihan D.L., Hertz-Pannier L. Microstructural correlates of infant functional development: example of the visual pathways. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28(8):1943-1948.
12. Gholipour-Baboli, A., Estroff, J., Warfield, S., 2010. Robust super-resolution volume reconstruction from slice acquisitions: application to fetal brain MRI. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag.
13. Haselgrove J.C., Moore J.R. Correction for distortion of echo-planar images used to calculate the apparent diffusion coefficient. Magn. Reson. Med. 1996, 36(6):960-964.
14. Jezzard P., Barnett A.S., Pierpaoli C. Characterization of and correction for eddy current artifacts in echo planar diffusion imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 1998, 39(5):801-812.
15. Jiang S., Xue H., Counsell S., Anjari M., Allsop J., Rutherford M., Rueckert D., Hajnal J.V. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the brain in moving subjects: application to in-utero fetal and ex-utero studies. Magn. Reson. Med. 2009, 62(3):645-655.
16. Jones D.K., Horsfield M.A., Simmons A. Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 1999, 42(3):515-525.
17. Kasprian G., Brugger P.C., Weber M., Krssk M., Krampl E., Herold C., Prayer D. In utero tractography of fetal white matter development. NeuroImage 2008, 43(2):213-224.
18. Kim D.-H., Chung S., Vigneron D.B., Barkovich A.J., Glenn O.A. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the fetal brain in vivo. Magn. Reson. Med. 2008, 59(1):216-220.
19. Kim K., Habas P.A., Rousseau F., Glenn O.A., Barkovich A.J., Studholme C. Intersection based motion correction of multislice MRI for 3-D in utero fetal brain image formation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2010, 29(1):146-158.
20. Kostovic I., Vasung L. Insights from in vitro fetal magnetic resonance imaging of cerebral development. Semin. Perinatol. 2009, 33(4):220-233.
21. Leemans A., Jones D.K. The B-matrix must be rotated when correcting for subject motion in DTI data. Magn. Reson. Med. 2009, 61(6):1336-1349.
22. Maes F., Collignon A., Vandermeulen D., Marchal G., Suetens P. Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 1997, 16(2):187-198.
23. Mangin J.-F., Poupon C., Clark C., Bihan D.L., Bloch I. Distortion correction and robust tensor estimation for MR diffusion imaging. Med. Image Anal. 2002, 6(3):191-198.
24. Merhof D., Soza G., Stadlbauer A., Greiner G., Nimsky C. Correction of susceptibility artifacts in diffusion tensor data using non-linear registration. Med. Image Anal. 2007, 11(6):588-603.
25. Minati L., Weglarz W.P. Physical foundations, models, and methods of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging of the brain: a review. Concepts Magn. Reson. 2007, 30A(5):278-307.
26. Mukherjee P., Miller J.H., Shimony J.S., Philip J.V., Nehra D., Snyder A.Z., Conturo T.E., Neil J.J., McKinstry R.C. Diffusion-tensor MR imaging of gray and white matter development during normal human brain maturation. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2002, 23(9):1445-1456.
27. Netsch T., van Muiswinkel A. Quantitative evaluation of image-based distortion correction in diffusion tensor imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2004, 23(7):789-798.
28. Nielsen J.F., Ghugre N.R., Panigrahy A. Affine and polynomial mutual information coregistration for artifact elimination in diffusion tensor imaging of newborns. Magn. Reson. Imag. 2004, 22(9):1319-1323.
29. Prayer D., Prayer L. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of cerebral white matter development. Eur. J. Radiol. 2003, 45(3):235-243.
30. Prayer D., Kasprian G., Krampl E., Ulm B., Witzani L., Prayer L., Brugger P.C. MRI of normal fetal brain development. Eur. J. Radiol. 2006, 57(2):199-216.
31. Press W.H., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T., Flannery B.P. Numerical Recipes 3rd Edition: The Art of Scientific Computing 2007, Cambridge University Press. third ed.
32. Righini A., Bianchini E., Parazzini C., Gementi P., Ramenghi L., Baldoli C., Nicolini U., Mosca F., Triulzi F. Apparent diffusion coefficient determination in normal fetal brain: a prenatal MR imaging study. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2003, 24(5):799-804.
33. Roemer, P.B., Hickey, J.S., 1988. Self-shielded gradient coils for nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Tech. rep., General Electric Company, Milwaukee, WI, assignee, US patent 4,737,716.
34. Rohde G.K., Barnett A.S., Basser P.J., Marenco S., Pierpaoli C. Comprehensive approach for correction of motion and distortion in diffusion-weighted MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2004, 51(1):103-114.
35. Rousseau F., Glenn O.A., Iordanova B., Rodriguez-Carranza C., Vigneron D.B., Barkovich J.A., Studholme C. Registration-based approach for reconstruction of high-resolution in utero fetal MR brain images. Acad. Radiol. 2006, 13(9):1072-1081.
36. Stejskal E.O., Tanner J.E. Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J. Chem. Phys. 1965, 42(1):288-292.
37. Tuch D.S., Reese T.G., Wiegell M.R., Makris N., Belliveau J.W., Wedeen V.J. High angular resolution diffusion imaging reveals intravoxel white matter fiber heterogeneity. Magn. Reson. Med. 2002, 48(4):577-582.
38. Turner R., Bihan D.L., Maier J., Vavrek R., Hedges L.K., Pekar J. Echo-planar imaging of intravoxel incoherent motion. Radiology 1990, 177(2):407-414.
39. Wells W.M., Viola P., Atsumi H., Nakajima S., Kikinis R. Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information. Med. Image Anal. 1996, 1(1):35-51.