Assessment of Korean customers' willingness to pay with RPS

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 695-703

  Kim, Jihyo ^a   Park, Jooyoung ^b   Kim, Haeyeon ^a   Heo, Eunnyeong ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Hanwha Corporation   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Contingent valuation; Renewable energy; Renewable Portfolio Standard; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

BUDGET CONTROL; COMPETITION; COSTS; ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION; ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS; HYDROELECTRIC POWER; WIND POWER;

CONTINGENT VALUATIONS; KOREAN GOVERNMENT; PRICE COMPETITION; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; RENEWABLE PORTFOLIO STANDARD; RENEWABLE SOURCES; USE OF RENEWABLE ENERGIES; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

RESOURCE VALUATION;

EID: 82355181034     PISSN: 13640321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.034     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. MKE (Korea Government Ministry of Knowledge Economy) Press releases [30.12.08] 2008 Available online at: http://mke.go.kr/news/bodo/bodoList.jsp [in Korean]
2. MKE (Korea Government Ministry of Knowledge Economy) Press releases [20.9.10] 2010 Available online at: http://mke.go.kr/news/bodo/bodoList.jsp [in Korean]
3. N. Rader, and S.H. Rader The renewable portfolio standard: A PRACTICAL guide. Prepared for the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioner 2001 Available online at: http://www.naruc.affiniscape.com/associations/1773/ files/rps.pdf
4. T. Berry, and M. Jaccard The renewable portfolio standard: design considerations and an implementation survey Energy Policy 29 2001 263 277
5. J. Chandler Trendy solutions: why do states adopt Sustainable Energy Portfolio Standards? Energy Policy 37 2009 3274 3281
6. H. Yin, and N. Powers Do state renewable portfolio standards promote in-state renewable generation? Energy Policy 38 2010 1140 1149
7. C. Chen, R. Wiser, A. Mills, and M. Bolinger Weighing the costs and benefits of state renewables portfolio standards in the United States: a comparative analysis of state-level policy impact projections Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13 2009 552 566
8. J.I Muñoz, A.A. Sánchez de la Nieta, J. Contreras, and J.L. Bernal-Agustín Optimal investment portfolio in renewable energy: the Spanish case Energy Policy 37 2009 5273 5284
9. K. Arrow, R. Solow, R.R. Portney, E.E. Leamer, R.H. Radner, and H. Schuman Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuations Federal Register 58 1993 4601 4614
10. S.L. Batley, D. Colbourne, P.D. Fleming, and P. Urwin Citizen versus consumer: challenges in the UK green power market Energy Policy 29 2001 479 487
11. N. Nomura, and M. Akai Willingness to pay for green electricity in Japan as estimated through contingent valuation method Applied Energy 78 2004 453 463
12. K. Ek Public and private attitudes towards "green" electricity: the case of Swedish wind power Energy Policy 33 2005 1677 1689
13. R.H. Wiser Using contingent valuation to explore willingness to pay for renewable energy: a comparison of collective and voluntary payment vehicles Ecological Economics 62 2007 419 432
14. C. Lee, and S.-J. Hwang Consumers' willingness to pay for renewable energy Environmental & Resource Economics 18 2009 173 192 [in Korean]
15. S.-H Yoo, and S.-Y. Kwak Willingness to pay for green electricity in Korea: a contingent valuation study Energy Policy 37 2009 5408 5416
16. N. Zografakis, E. Sifaki, M. Pagalou, G. Nikitaki, V. Psarakis, and K.P. Tsagarakis Assessment of public acceptance and willingness to pay for renewable energy sources in Crete Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14 2010 1088 1095
17. KEMCO (Korea Energy Management Corporation) New and renewable energy statistics 2008 2009 ed. 2009 Yongin, Korea [in Korean]
18. R.C. Mitchell, and R.T. Carson Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method 1989 Resources for the Future Washington, D.C.
19. A. Menegaki Valuation for renewable energy: a comparative review Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 12 2008 2422 2437
20. W.M Hanemann Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66 1984 332 341
21. P.O. Johansson, and B. Kriström Measuring values for imporved air quality from discrete response data: two experiments Journal of Agricultural Economics 39 1988 439 445
22. M. Hanemann, J. Loomis, and B. Kanninen Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73 1991 1255 1263
23. B. Kriström Spike models in contingent valuation American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79 1997 1013 1023
24. T.C. Haab, and K.E. McConnell Referendum models and negative willingness to pay: alternative solutions Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32 1997 251 270
25. I. Bateman, R.T. Carson, B. Day, M. Hanemann, N. Hanley, and T. Hett Economic valuation with stated preference techniques: a manual 2002 Edward Elga Massachusetts, USA/Glos, UK
26. D. Kahneman, and J.L. Knetsch Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22 1992 57 70
27. K.J. Boyle, M.P. Welsh, and R.C. Bishop The role of question order and respondent experience in contingent-valuation studies Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 25 1993 S80 S99
28. I. Ajzen, T.C. Brown, and L.H. Rosenthal Information bias in contingent valuation: effects of personal relevance, quality of information, and motivational orientation Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 30 1996 43 57
29. J.K Hammitt, and J.D. Graham Willingness to pay for health protection: inadequate sensitivity to probability? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 18 1999 33 62
30. R.T. Carson, N.E. Flores, and N.F. Meade Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence Environmental & Resource Economics 19 2001 173 210
31. E. Strazzera, R. Scarpa, P. Calia, G.D. Garrod, and K.G. Willis Modelling zero values and protest responses in contingent valuation surveys Applied Economics 35 2003 133 138
32. S.-H. Cho, S.T. Yen, J.M. Bowker, and D.H. Newman Modeling willingness to pay for land conservation easements: treatment of zero and protest bids and application and policy implications Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 40 2008 267 285
33. J.M. Bowker, D.H. Newman, R.J. Warren, and D.W. Henderson Estimating the economic value of lethal versus nonlethal deer control in suburban communities Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal 16 2003 143 158
34. MKE (Korea Government Ministry of Knowledge Economy) Press releases [6.1.11] 2011 Available online at: http://mke.go.kr/news/bodo/bodoList.jsp [in Korean]
35. W.H. Greene Econometric analysis 5th ed. 2002 Prentice Hall New York
36. KEPCO (Korea Electric Power Corporation) Summary of electricity statistics 2010 Available online at: http://www.kepco.co.kr/ [in Korean]
37. KOSIS (Korea Statistical Information Service) Estimated future households 2010 Available online at: http://www.kosis.kr/abroad/abroad-01List.jsp [in Korean]
38. MKE (Korea Government Ministry of Knowledge Economy) Press releases [28.9.09] 2009 Available online at: http://mke.go.kr/news/bodo/bodoList.jsp [in Korean]
39. KEEI (Korea Energy Economics Institute), and KEI (Korea Environment Institute) Activation of green electricity market 2005 Uiwang-si, Korea [in Korean]
40. KEMCO (Korea Energy Management Corporation) Introduction of a Feed-in-Tariff system 2010 Available online at: http://www.knrec.or.kr/knrec/12/ KNREC120600.asp [in Korean]
41. KERI (Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute) A study on the design and application of RPS (Renewable Portfolio Standard) system in Korea 2009 Uiwang-si, Korea [in Korean]
42. EPSIS (Electric Power Statistics Information System) System marginal price statistics 2010 Available online at: http://epsis.kpx.or.kr/ [in Korean]
43. MKE (Korea Government Ministry of Knowledge Economy) The 4th basic plan for power supply (2008-2022) 2008 Gwachon-si, Korea [in Korean]
44. R. Wiser, G. Barbose, and E. Holt Supporting solar power in renewable portfolio standards: experience from the United States 2010 Berkeley, USA