Referendum models and negative willingness to pay: Alternative solutions

Journal of Environmental Economics and Management

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 251-270

  Haab, Timothy C ^a   McConnell, Kenneth E ^b  

^a EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031080326     PISSN: 00950696     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1996.0968     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. An M. Y., Ayala R. A. A Mixture Model of Willingness to Pay Distributions. 1995;Duke UniversityDepartment of Economics.
2. T. C. Brown, P. A. Champ, R. C. Bishop, D. W. McCollum, 1995, Which Response Format Reveals the Truth about Donations for a Public Good?
3. Cameron T. A. A new paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data: Maximum likelihood estimation by censored logistic regression. J. Environ. Econom. Management. 15:1988;355-379.
4. Cameron T. A., Huppert D. D. Referendum contingent valuation estimates: Sensitivity to the assignment of offered values. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 86:1991;910-918.
5. R. T. Carson, W. M. Hanemann, R. J. Kopp, J. A. Krosnick, R. C. Mitchell, S. Presser, P. A. Ruud, V. K. Smith, 1994a, Prospective Interim Lost Use Value Due to DDT and PCB Contamination in the Southern California Bight.
6. Carson R. T., Wilks L., Imber D. Valuing the preservation of Australia's Kakadu Conservation Zone. Oxford Econom. Papers. 46:1994b;727-749.
7. Cosslett S. R. Distribution-free maximum likelihood estimator of the binary choice model. Econometrica. 51:1982;765-782.
8. Cummings R. G., Harrison G. W., Ruström E. E. Homegrown values and hypothetical surveys: Is the dichotomous choice approach incentive-compatible? Amer. Econom. Rev. 85:1995;260-266.
9. Dempster A. P., Laird N. M., Rubin D. B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B. 39:1976;1-38.
10. J. W. Duffield, 1991, Western Regional Research Project W-133 Benefits & Costs in Natural Resources Planning.
11. Duffield J. W., Patterson D. A. Inference and optimal design for a welfare measure in dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Land Econom. 67:1991;225-239.
12. T. C. Haab, 1995a, The Imact of Nonparticipants on Nonmarket Valuation Techniques.
13. Haab T. C. The Distributional Impact of Indifference on Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation. 1995b;East Carolina UniversityDepartment of Economics.
14. Haab T. C., McConnell K. E. Intuitive Bounds on Willingness to Pay. 1996;East Carolina UniversityDepartment of Economics.
15. Hanemann W. M. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. Amer. J. Agri. Econom. 66:1984;332-341.
16. Hanemann W. M. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete response data: Reply. Amer. J. Agri. Econom. 71:1989;1057.
17. Hanemann W. M., Kristrom B. Preference uncertainty, optimal designs, and spikes. Current Issues in Environmental Economics. 1995;Manchester Univ. Press, Manchester.
18. Harrison G., Kristrom B. On the interpretation of responses to contingent valuation surveys. Johansson P.-O., Kristrom B., Mahler K. G. Current Issues in Environmental Economics. 1995;Manchester Univ. Press, Manchester.
19. J. Huang, 1994, New Discrete Choice Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities: Theory and Evidence.
20. Johansson P., Kristom B., Maler K. G. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete response data: Comment. Amer. J. Agri. Econom. 66:1989;1054-1056.
21. Kristrom B. A non-parametric approach to the estimation of welfare measures in discrete response valuation studies. Land Econom. 66:1990;135-139.
22. B. Kristom, 1995, Spike Models in Contingent Valuation: Theory and Illustrations, 1st Toulouse Conference on Environmental and Resource Economics, Toulouse, France, Mar. 30-31 (1995).
23. K. E. McConnell, J. H. Ducci, 1989, Valuing Environmental Quality in Developing Countries: Two Case Studies.
24. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Zarembka P. Frontiers in Econometrics. 1974;Academic Press, New York.
25. McFadden D. Contingent valuation and social choice. Amer. J. Agri. Econom. 76:1994;689-708.
26. R. Ready, D. Hu, 1994, Calculating Mean Willingness to Pay from Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation Data.
27. Robertson T., Wright F. T., Dykstra R. L. Order Restricted Statistical Inference. 1988;Wiley, New York.
28. Turnbull B. The empirical distribution function with arbitrarily grouped, censored and truncated data. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B. 38:1976;290-295.
29. M. Werner, 1994, Allowing for indifference in dichotomous choice contingent valuation models, Public Choice Issues in Environmental Economics.