Modelling zero values and protest responses in contingent valuation surveys

Applied Economics

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 133-138

  Strazzera, Elisabetta ^a   Scarpa, Riccardo ^b   Calia, Pinuccia ^c   Garrod, Guy D ^d   Willis, Kenneth G ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAGLIARI   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^d NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINGENT VALUATION; PLANNING METHOD; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0037454925     PISSN: 00036846     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0003684022000015900     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Alberini, A., Kanninen, B. and Carson, R. T. (1997) Modeling response incentive effects in dichotomous choice contingent valuation data, Land Economics, 73(3), 309-24.
2. An, M. Y. and Ayala, R. A. (1996) A mixture model of willingness to pay distributions, Mimeo available by FTP at pub/ man/papers/npecross.ps.
3. Bateman, I. J., Langford, I. H. and Rasbash, J. (1999) Willingness to pay question format effects in contingent valuation studies, in Valuing Environmental Preferences (eds) I. J. Bateman and K. G. Willis, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
4. Calia, P. and Strazzera, E. (2001) A sample selection model for protest responses in contingent valuation analyses, Statistica, 61(3), 473-85; also available as Economics Energy Environment. Note di Lavoro Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, n. 55/99.
5. Cameron, T. A. (1991) Interval estimates of non-market resource values from referendum contingent valuation surveys, Land Economics, 67, 413-21.
6. Copas, J. B. and Li, H. G. (1997) Inference for non-random samples, J. Royal Statistical Society, B, 59(1), 55-95.
7. Copas, J. B. (1990) A likelihood approach to sample selectivity in multiple and binary regression models for comparative studies, School of Mathematics and Statistics Working Paper, 20/90, University of Birmingham.
8. Dalmau-Matarrodona, E. (2001) Alternative approaches to obtain optimal bid values in contingent valuation studies and to model protest zeros. Estimating the determinants of individuals' willingness to pay for home care services in day case surgery, Health Economics, 10(2), 101-18.
9. Hanemann, W. M. and Kanninen, B. (1999) The statistical analysis of discrete response CV data, in Valuing Environmental Preferences (eds) I. J. Bateman and K. G. Willis, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10. Kriström, B. (1997) Spike models in contingent valuation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79, 1013-23.
11. McFadden, D. (1994) Contingent valuation and social choice, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76, 689-708.
12. Nawata, K. and Nagase, N. (1996) Estimation of sample selection bias models, Econometric Reviews, 15, 387-400.
13. Reiser, B. and Shechter, M. (1998) Incorporating zero values in the economic valuation of environmental program benefits, Environmetrics, 10, 87-101.
14. Scarpa, R., Garrod, G. D. and Willis, K. G. (2000) Estimating WTP for speed reduction from dichotomous-choice CV responses with follow-up: the case of rural trunk roads. Economics Energy Environment. Nota di Lavoro 73.99, revised 2000, Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei, Milano.
15. Vella, F. (1998) Estimating models with sample selection bias: a survey, Journal of Human Resources, 33(1), 127-69.
16. Werner, M. (1999) Allowing for zeros in dichotomous choice contingent valuation models, Journal of Business and Statistics, 17(4), 479-86.