Coupled parametric model for estimation of visual field tests based on OCT macular thickness maps, and vice versa, in glaucoma care

Medical Image Analysis

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 101-113

  Tsai, Andy ^a   Caprioli, Joseph ^b   Shen, Lucy Q ^c  

^a BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b JULES STEIN EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

Author keywords

Glaucoma; OCT; PCA; Visual field testing

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMIC FRAMEWORK; COUPLED MODELS; ESTIMATED PARAMETER; FOURIER DOMAIN OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; FUNCTIONAL INFORMATION; GLAUCOMA; IMAGING TECHNOLOGY; INDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY; LEAVE-ONE-OUT CROSS VALIDATIONS; LINEAR LEAST SQUARES PROBLEMS; OCT; PARAMETRIC ESTIMATION; PARAMETRIC MODELS; PCA; STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; STRUCTURAL INFORMATION; THICKNESS MAP; VISUAL FIELDS;

ESTIMATION; MODELS; OPHTHALMOLOGY; OPTICAL TOMOGRAPHY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SUBJECTIVE TESTING; THICKNESS GAGES; THICKNESS MEASUREMENT; VISION;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PATIENT CARE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; RETINA MACULA LUTEA; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MACULA LUTEA; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETINOSCOPY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; VISUAL FIELD TESTS;

EID: 82355173433     PISSN: 13618415     EISSN: 13618423     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2011.05.012     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Budenz D.L., Chang R.T., Fredette M.J., Feuer W.J., Anderson D.R. Reproducibility of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber thickness measurements with Stratus OCT in glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology 2008, 115(4):661-666.
2. Essock E., Gunvant P., Zheng Y., Garway-Heath D., Kotecha A., Spratt A. Predicting visual field loss in ocular hypertensive patients using wavelet-fourier analysis of GDx scanning laser polarimetry. Optometry and Vision Science 2007, 84:E380-E387.
3. Ferreras A., Pablo L.E., Garway-Heath D.F., Paolo F., Garvia-Feijoo J. Mapping standard automated perimetry to the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer in glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2008, 49:3018-3025.
4. Gonzalez-Garcia A.O., Vizzeri G., Bowd C., Medeiros F.A., Zangwill L.M., Weinreb R.N. Reproducibility of RTVue retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc measurements and agreement with Stratus optical coherence tomography measurements. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2009, 147:1067-1074. e1.
5. Harwerth R.S., Vilupuru A.S., Rangaswamy N.V., Smith E.L. The relationship between nerve fiber layer and perimetry measurements. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2007, 48:763-773. 3rd.
6. Hood D.C., Kardon R.H. A framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 2007, 26:688-710.
7. Hood D.C., Anderson S.C., Wall M., Kardon R.H. Structure versus function in glaucoma: an application of a linear model. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2007, 48:3662-3668.
8. Jolliffe I. Principal Component Analysis 2002, Springer-Verlag.
9. Leung C.K., Cheung C.Y., Weinreb R.N., Qiu K., Liu S., Li H., Xu G., Fan N., Pang C.P., Tse K.K., Lam D.S. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma: a study on optical coherence tomography guided progression analysis. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2010, 51:217-222.
10. Leventon, M., 2000. Statistical models for medical image analysis. MIT Ph.D. Thesis.
11. Little R., Rubin D. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data 2002, Wiley.
12. Pearson K. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philosophical Magazine 1901, 2:559-572.
13. Prevent Blindness America Survey, 2002. Prevent Blindness America, 211 West Wacker Drive, Suite 1700, Chicago, Illinois 60606.
14. Raiko T., Ilin A., Karhunen J. Principal component analysis for large scale problems with lots of missing values. European Conference on Machine Learning 2007, 691-698.
15. Roweis S. EM algorithms for PCA and SPCA. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 1998, 626-632.
16. Scholkopf B., Smola A., Muller K.R. Nonlinear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem. Neural Computation 1998, 10:1299-1319.
17. Schuman J.S., Pedut-Kloizman T., Hertzmark E., Hee M.R., Wilkins J.R., Coker J.G., Puliafito C.A., Fujimoto J.G., Swanson E.A. Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 1996, 103:1889-1898.
18. Shen, L.Q., Mock, D., Sami, M., Caprioli, J., 2010. Regional macular thickness correlates with glaucomatous visual field loss. American Glaucoma Society Annual Meeting, March, 2010, Naples, FL.
19. Tipping M.E., Bishop C.M. Probabilistic principal component analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1999, 61:611-622.
20. Tsai A., Wells W., Tempany C., Grimson E., Willsky A. Mutual information in coupled multi-shape model for medical image segmentation. Medical Image Analysis 2004, 8(4):429-445.
21. Wojtkowski M., Srinivasan V., Fujimoto J.G., Ko T., Schuman J.S., Kowalczyk A., Duker J.S. Three-dimensional retinal imaging with high-speed ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2005, 112:1734-1746.
22. Wolf-Schnurrbusch U.E., Ceklic L., Brinkmann C.K., Illiev M.E., Frey M., Rothenbuehler S.P., Enzmann V., Wolf S. Mascular thickness measurements in healthy eyes using six different optical coherence tomography instruments. Investigative Ophthalmology 2009, 50(7):3432-3437.
23. Yang J., Zhang D., Frangi A.F., Jing-yu Y. Two dimensional PCA: a new approach to appearance-based face representation and recognition. IEEE Transactions on PAMI 2004, 26:131-137.