A comparison of presentation methods of video identification parades

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 835-840

  Wilcock, Rachel ^a   Kneller, Wendy ^b  

^a LONDON SOUTH BANK UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WINCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; OFFENDER; POLICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; UNITED KINGDOM; VIDEORECORDING; WITNESS;

EID: 82255194170     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1754     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ebbesen, E. B., & Flowe, H. D. (2002). Simultaneous V. sequential lineups: What do we really know? Retrieved from, 17th November 2005.
2. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
3. Huff, C. R., Rattner, A., & Sagarin, E. (1986). Guilty until proven innocent: Wrongful conviction and public policy. Crime and Delinquency, 32, 518-544.
4. Kneller, W., Memon, A., & Stevenage, S. (2001). Simultaneous and sequential lineups: Decision processes of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 659-671.
5. Levi, A. M., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2001). Lineup and photo spread procedures: Issues concerning policy recommendations. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 7, 776-790.
6. Lindsay, R. C. L., & Wells, G. L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 556-564.
7. Lindsay, R. C. L., Lea, J. A., & Fulford, J. A. (1991). Sequential lineup presentation: Technique matters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 741-745.
8. Mansour, J. K., Lindsay, R. C. L., Brewer, N., & Munhall, K. G. (2009). Characterizing visual behaviour in a linup task. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 1012-1026.
9. McQuiston-Surrett, D., Malpass, R. S., & Tredoux, C. G. (2006). Sequential versus simultaneous lineups: A review of methods data and theory. Psychology, Public, Policy and Law, 12, 137-169.
10. Meissner, C. A., Tredoux, C. G., Parker, J. F., & MacLin, O. H. (2005). Eyewitness decisions in simultaneous and sequential lineups: A dual-process signal detection theory analysis. Memory & Cognition, 33, 783-792.
11. Memon, A., & Gabbert, F. (2003). Improving the identification accuracy of senior witnesses: Do pre-lineup questions and sequential testing help? Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 341-347.
12. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
13. Pike, G., Brace, N., & Kynan, S. (2002). The visual identification of suspects: Procedures and practice. Home Office Briefing Note 2/02. London: Home Office.
14. Video ID parades picked out as good practice. (2004). retrieved 12th January 2005.
15. Police and Criminal Evidence Act. Code D Code of Practice for the Identification of Persons by Police Officers (2008 edition), retrieved 23rd April 2010.
16. Steblay, N., Dysart, J., Fulero, S., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2001). Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 459-476.
17. Technical Working Group for Eyewitness Evidence. (1999). Eyewitness evidence: A guide for law enforcement. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
18. Valentine, T., & Heaton, P. (1999). An evaluation of the fairness of police line-ups and video identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 59-72.
19. Valentine, T., Harris, N., Colman Piera, A., & Darling, S. (2003). Are police video identifications fair to African-Caribbean suspects? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 459-476.
20. Valentine, T., Darling, S., & Memon, A. (2007). Do strict rules and moving images increase the reliability of sequential identification procedures? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 933-949.
21. Wells, G. L., & Windschitl, P. D. (1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1115-1125.
22. Wilcock, R. A., Bull, R., & Vrij, A. (2005). Aiding the performance of older eyewitnesses: Enhanced non-biased lineup instructions and lineup presentation. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 12, 129-140.
23. Wilcock, R., Bull, R., & Milne, R. (2008). Witness identification in criminal cases: Psychology and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.