An Evaluation of the Fairness of Police Line-Ups and Video Identifications

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 13, Issue 1 SUPPL., 1999, Pages

  Valentine, Tim ^a   Heaton, Pamela ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0008440672     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0720(199911)13:1+3.0.co;2-y     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ainsworth, P. B. and King, E. (1988). Witnesses' perceptions of identification parades. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris and R. N. Sykes (Eds), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 1). Chichester: Wiley.
2. Brandon, R. and Davies, C. (1973). Wrongful imprisonment: Mistaken convictions and their consequences. London: George Allen & Unwin.
3. Brigham, J. C. and Pfeifer, J. E. (1994). Evaluating the fairness of line-ups. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read and M. P. Toglia (Eds), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Brigham, J. C., Meissner, C. A. and Wasserman, A. W. (1999). Applied issues in the construction and expert assessment of photo lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology 13, S73-S92.
5. Brigham, J. C., Ready, D. J. and Spier, S. A. (1990). Standards for evaluating the fairness of photograph lineups. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 149-163.
6. Connors, E., Lundregan, T., Miller, N. and McEwan, T. (1996). Convicted by juries, exonerated by science: Case studies in the use of DNA evidence to establish innocence after trial. Alexandria, VA: National Institute of Justice.
7. Davies, G. M. (1996). Mistaken identification: Where law meets psychology head on. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 232-241.
8. Devlin, Lord P (1976). Report to the Secretary of State for the Home Department on the Departmental Committee on Evidence of Identification in Criminal Cases. London: HMSO.
9. Doob, A. N. and Kirshenbaum, H. M. (1973). Bias in Police line-ups-partial remembering. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 1, 287-293.
10. Lindsay, R. C. L., Smith, S. M. and Pryke, S. (1999). Measures of lineup fairness: Do they postdict identification accuracy? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, S93-S107.
11. Huff, C. R., Ratner, A. and Sagarin, E. (1986). Guilty until proven innocent: Wrongful conviction and public policy. Crime & Delinquency, 32, 518-544.
12. Her Majesty's Stationary Office (1995). Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (s.60(a) and s.66) Codes of Practice. London: HMSO Publications.
13. Slater, A. (1994). Identification parades: A scientific evaluation. Police Research Award Scheme, London: Police Research Group, Home Office.
14. Tredoux, C. G. (1996). Statistical inference on measures of lineup fairness. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 217-237.
15. Tredoux, C. G. (1999). Statistical considerations when determining measures of lineup size and lineup bias. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, S9-S26.
16. Wells, G. L. (1993). What do we know about eyewitness identification? American Psychologist, 48, 553-571.
17. Wells, G. L. and Bradfield, A. L. (1999). Measuring the goodness of lineups: Parameter Estimation, Question Effects, and limits to the mock witness paradigm. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, S27-S39.
18. Wells, G. L., Small, M., Penrod, S., Malpass, R. S., Fulero, S. M. and Brinacombe, C. A. E. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for line-ups and photospreads. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 603-647.
19. Wright, D. B. and McDaid, A. T. (1996). Comparing system and estimator variables using data from real line-ups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 75-84.