Characterizing visual behaviour in a lineup task

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 23, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1012-1026

  Mansour, Jamal K ^a   Lindsay, R C L ^a   Brewer, Neil ^b   Munhall, K G ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRIME; EMOTION; EYE MOVEMENT; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF REPORT; TASK PERFORMANCE; VIGNETTE; VISUAL MEMORY;

EID: 70449428592     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1570     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bertrand, M., Beaudry, J., Mansour, J., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2006). Is increasing lineup size an alternative to sequential presentation? The question revisited and revamped. Poster presented at the American Psychology-Law Society, St. Petersburg, Florida.
2. Bloom, L. C., & Mudd, S. A. (1991). Depth of processing approach to face recognition: A test of two theories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 556-565. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.17.3.556
3. Calvo, M. G., & Lang, P. J. (2004). Gaze patterns when looking at emotional pictures: Motivationally biased attention. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 221-243. DOI: 10.1023/B:MOEM.0000040153.26156
4. Charman, S., & Wells, G. W. (2007). Applied lineup theory. In R. Lindsay, D. Ross, J. Read, & M. Toglia (Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology: Memory for people (pp. 219-254). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Christianson, S. A., Loftus, E. F., Hoffman, H., & Loftus, G. R. (1991). Eye fixations and memory for emotional events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 693-701. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.17.4.693
6. Clark, S. E. (2003). A memory and decision model for eyewitness identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 629-654. DOI: 10.1002/acp.891
7. Collewijn, H. (1999). Eye movement recording. In R. H. S. Carpenter, & J. G. Robson (Eds.), Vision research: A practical guide to laboratory methods (pp. 245-285). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Dunning, D., & Stern, L. B. (1994). Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate eyewitness identifications via inquiries about decision processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 818-835. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.17.4.693
9. Everdell, I. T., Marsh, H., Yurick, M. D., Munhall, K. G., & Paré, M. (2007). Gaze behavior in audiovisual speech: Asymmetrical distribution of face-directed fixations. Perception, 36, 1355-1545. DOI: 10.1068/p5852
10. Findlay, J. M., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2003). Active vision: The psychology of looking and seeing. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Gilchrist, I. D., & Harvey, M. (2006). Evidence for a systematic component within scan paths in visual search. Visual Cognition, 14, 704-715. DOI: 10.'080/'3506280500193719
12. Henderson, J. M., Falk, R., Minut, S., Dyer, F. C., & Mahadevan, S. (2001). Gaze control for face learning and recognition by humans and machines. In T. F. Shipley, & P. J. Kellman (Eds.), From fragments to objects: Segmentation and grouping in vision (pp. 463-481). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
13. Henderson, J. M., Williams, C. C., & Falk, R. J. (2005). Eye movements are functional during face learning. Memory & Cognition, 33, 98-106.
14. Hope, L., & Wright, D. (2008). Beyond unusual? Examining the role of attention in the weapon focus effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 957-961. DOI: 10.1002/acp.1307
15. Kneller, W., Memon, A., & Stevenage, S. (2001). Simultaneous and sequential lineups: Decision processes of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 659-671. DOI: 10.1002/acp.739
16. Leippe, M. R., & Eisenstadt, D. (2006). Eyewitness confidence and confidence-accuracy: Should we be concerned? In R. Lindsay, D. Ross, J. Read, & M. Toglia (Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology: Memory for people (pp. 377-425). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Lindsay, R. C. L., & Bellinger, K. (1999). Alternatives to the sequential lineup: The importance of controlling the pictures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 315-321. DOI: 10.1037/ 0021-9010.84.3.315
18. Lindsay, R. C. L., & Wells, G. L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 556-564. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.70.3.556
19. Loftus, E. F., Loftus, G. R., & Messo, J. (1987). Some facts about 'weapon focus". Law & Human Behavior, 11, 55-62. DOI: 10.1007/BF01044839
20. Loftus, G. R., & Mackworth, N. H. (1978). Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 565-572. DOI: doi:10.1037/0096-1523.4.4.565
21. Mäkelä, P., Näsänen, R., Rovamo, J., & Melmoth, D. (2001). Identification of facial images in peripheral vision. Vision Research, 4, 599-610. DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00259-5
22. McQuiston-Surrett, D., Malpass, R. S., & Tredoux, C. G. (2006). Sequential vs. simultaneous lineups: A review of methods, data, and theory. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 137-169. DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.153
23. Mertens, I., Siegmund, H., & Grusser, O.-J. (1993). Gaze motor asymmetries in the perception of faces during a memory task. Neuropsychologia, 31, 989-998. DOI: 10.1016/ 0028.-3932%2893%2990154-R
24. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
25. Perfect, T. J., Hollins, T. S., & Hunt, A. L. R. (2000). Practice and feedback effects on the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness memory. Memory, 8, 235-244. DOI: 10.1080/096582100406793
26. Peterson, L. R., & Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short-term retention of individiual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 193-198.
27. Pomplun, M., Sichelschmidt, L., Wagner, K., Clermont, T., Rickheit, G., & Ritter, H. (2001). Comparative visual search: A difference that makes a difference. Cognitive Science, 25, 3-36. DOI: 10.1016/ S0364-0213(00)00037-9
28. Smith, S. M., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Pryke, S. (2000). Postdictors of eyewitness errors: Can false identifications be diagnosed? Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 542-550. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.542
29. Sporer, S. L. (1993). Eyewitness identification accuracy, confidence, and decision times in simultaneous and sequential lineups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 22-33. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.22
30. Stampe, D. (1993). Heuristic filtering and reliable calibration methods for video-based pupil-tracking system. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 137-142. DOI: 10.1016/ S0165-0270(01)00527-1
31. Weber, N., Brewer, N., Wells, G. L., Semmler C., & Keast, A. (2004). Eyewitness identification accuracy and response latency: The unruly 10-12 second rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10, 139-147. DOI: 10.1037/1076-898X.10.3.139
32. Wells, G. L. (1984). The psychology of lineup identifications. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, 89-103. DOI: 10.1111/ j.1559-1816.1984.tb02223.x