Modeling the acceptance of socially interactive robotics: Social presence in human-robot interaction

Interaction Studies

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 430-460

  Shin, Dong Hee ^a   Choo, Hyungseung ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Robot acceptance model; Social presence; Social robots; Socially interactive robots

Indexed keywords

EID: 82155185521     PISSN: 15720373     EISSN: 15720381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/is.12.3.04shi     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Alac, M. (2009). Moving android: On social robots and body-in-interaction. Social Studies of Science, 39 (4), 491-528.
2. Arras, K.O., & Cerqui, D. (2005). Do we want to share our lives and bodies with robots? A 2000. people survey. Technical report Nr. 0605-001, Autonomous Systems Lab. Swiss Federal Insti- tute of Technology Lausanne.
3. Bagozzi, R.P., & Y. Yi. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.
4. Bartneck, C., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., & Nomura, T. (2007). Te infuence of people's culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards Robots. AI and Society, 21(1), 217-230. (Pubitemid 44710303)
5. Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative ft indices in structural models, Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
6. Biocca, F., & Nowak, K. (2001). Plugging your body into the telecommunication system. In C. Lin & D. Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology and society (pp. 407-447). Waverly Hill, VI: Hampton Press.
7. Breazeal, C. (2003). Towards sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42 (3-4), 167-175.
8. Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model ft: Testing Structural Equation Models. Sage: Newbury Park, CA.
9. Burgar, C., Lum, P., Shor, P., &Van der Loos, H. (2002). Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 37(6), 663-673.
10. Byrne, B.M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL. International Journal of Testing 1(1), 55-86.
11. Cronbach, L.J. (1971). Test validation: Educational measurement. In: Torndike, R.L. (Ed.), American Council on Education, second ed., Washington, pp. 443-507.
12. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: Te psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.
13. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology MIS Quarterly 13 (3), 319-340.
14. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1111-1132.
15. Dautenhahn, K. (2003). Roles and functions of robots in human society: Implications from research in autism therapy Robotica, 21 (4), 443-452.
16. Dautenhahn, K. (1998). Te art of designing socially intelligent agents-science, fction, and the human in the loop. Applied Artifcial Intelligence Journal, 12 (7-8), 573-617. (Pubitemid 128625208)
17. De Carolis, B., & Cozzolongo, G. (2007). Planning the behavior of a social robot acting as a majordomo in public environments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4733, 805-812.
18. Dufy, B. (2003). Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 177-190.
19. Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Dautenhahn, K. (2003). A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42, 143-166.
20. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
21. Gockley, R., Simmons, R., & Forlizzi, J. (2006). Modeling afect in socially interactive robots. Te 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Hatfeld, UK, September 6-8, 2006, pp. 558-563.
22. Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.), Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
23. Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2006). Te impact of infusing social presence in the web interface. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10 (2), 31-55.
24. Heerink, M., Kröse, B.J. A., Wielinga, B.J., & Evers, V (2009). Measuring acceptance of an assistive social robot. Proceedings of Ro-man 2009, Toyama, pp. 528-533.
25. Heerink, M., Krose, B., Evers, V., & Wielinga, B. (2008). Te infuence of social presence on acceptance of a companion robot by older people. Journal of Physical Agents, 2 (2), 33-40.
26. Heeter, C. (1992). Being there: Te subjective experience of presence. Presence, 1(2), 262-271.
27. Heijden, H. (2004). User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(4), 695-704.
28. Hsu, C., & Lu, H. (2007). Consumer behavior in online game communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1642-1659.
29. Hayashi, A., Chen, C., Ryan, T., & Wu, J. (2004). Te role of social presence and moderating role of computer self efcacy in predicting the continuance usage of e-learning systems. Journal of Information Systems Educations, 15 (2), 139-154.
30. Joreskog, K.G., & Sorbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: Users reference guide. Chicago: Scientifc Sof- ware International.
31. Jung, Y. (2008). Infuence of sense of presence on intention to participate in a virtual community. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008), pp. 325.
32. Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., & Ishiguro, H. (2003). Person identifcation and interaction of social robots by using wireless tags. In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS2003), pages 1657-1664, Las Vegas, NV, October 2003.
33. Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., & Ishiguro, H. (2004). Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A feld trial, human computer interaction, 19 (1-2), 61-84.
34. Kanda, T., Shiomi, M., Miyashita, Z., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N. (2009). An afective guide robot in a shopping mall. 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction (HRI2009), pp.173-180.
35. Kawamura, K., Bagchi, S., Iskarous, M., & Bishay, M. (1995). Intelligent robotic systems in service of the disabled. Proceedings of IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 3 (1), 14-21.
36. Kelloway E.K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling. Tousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Kiesler, S., & Hinds, P. (2004). Introduction to this special issue on human-robot interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 19 (1/2), 1-8.
38. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P., Jochems, W., & Burren, H. (2007). Measuring perceived sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 49 (2), 176-192. (Pubitemid 46777130)
39. Kuzuoka, H., Yamazaki, K., Yamaziki, A., Suga, Y., & Heath, C. (2004). Dual ecologies of robot as communication media. Proceedings of CHI, 183-90.
40. Loehlin, J.C. (1998). Latent variables models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural anal- ysis. 3rd Ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41. Lombard, M., & Ditton, T.B. (1997). At the heart of it all: Te concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated-Communication, 3 (2), http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue2/lombard. html.
42. Luf, P., Heath, C., Kuzuoka, H., Hindmarsh, J., & Oyama, S. (2003). Fractured ecologies: creating environments for collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction, 18 (1/2), 51-84.
43. Mahoney R., Can der Loos, H., Lum, P., & Burgar, C. (2003). Robotic stroke therapy assistant. Robotica, 21, 33-44.
44. Nomura, T., Suzuki, T., Kanda, T., Han, J., Shin, D., Burke J., & Kato, K. (2008). What people assume about humanoid and animal-type robots: Cross-cultural analysis between Japan, Korea, and the United States. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 5, 25-46. (Pubitemid 351728649)
45. Novak, K., & Biocca, F. (2003). Te efect of the agency and anthropomorphism on users' sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence 12 (5), 481-494. (Pubitemid 38137121)
46. Salem, M., Kopp, S., Wachsmuth, I., & Joublin, F. (2009). Towards meaningful robot gesture. Cognitive Systems Monograph, 6, 173-182.
47. Sallnas, E. (2005). Efects of communication mode on social presence, virtual presence, and performance in collaborative virtual environments. Presence, 14 (4), 434-449. (Pubitemid 41365736)
48. Schermerhorn, P., Scheutz, M., & Crowell, C. (2008). Robot social presence and gender. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction. HRI'08, March 12-15, 2008, Amsterdam, Te Netherlands. pp. 263-270.
49. Shin, D., & Kim, W. (2008). Applying the technology acceptance model and fow theory to Cyworld user behavior. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 11 (3), 378-382.
50. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). Te social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons.
51. Toyoda, H. (2007). Structural equation modeling. Tokyo, Japan: Tosho Publishing.
52. Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M.G. (2000). Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social infuence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24 (1), 115-139.
53. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F.D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal feld studies. Management Science, 46 (2), 186-204. (Pubitemid 30594361)
54. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, B., & Davis, F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unifed view. MIS Quarterly 27(3), 425-478.
55. Wada, K., Shibata, T., Saito, T., & Tanie, K. (2002). Analysis of factors that bring mental efects to elderly people in robot assisted activity Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2, pages 1152-1157, Lausanne, Switzerland, October 2002. (Pubitemid 35437964)
56. Weiss, A., Rernhaupt, R., Tscheligi, M., Wollherr, D., Kühnlenz, K., & Buss, M. (2008). A meth- odological variation for acceptance evaluation of human-robot interaction in public places. IEEE Int. Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN2008), 713-718.
57. Yanco, H. (2002). Evaluating the performance of assistive robotic systems. Proceedings of the Workshop on Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems, Gaithersburg, MD, August 2002.