Effects of communication mode on social presence, virtual presence, and performance in collaborative virtual environments

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 434-449

  Sallnäs, Eva Lotta ^a  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 25444446130     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/105474605774785253     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anderson, A., Newlands, A., Mullen, J., Flemming, A. M., Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Van der Velden, J. (1996). Impact of video-mediated communication on simulated service encounters. Interacting with Computers, 8(2), 193-206.
2. Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J. (submitted). Criteria and scope conditions for a theory and measure of social presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.
3. Bly, S. A., Harrison, S. R., & Irwin, S. (1993). Media spaces: Bringing people together in a video, audio, and computing environment. Communications of the ACM, 36(1), 28-47.
4. Chapanis, A. (1975). Interactive human communication. Scientific American, 232, 36-42.
5. Chapanis, A., Ochsman, R. B., Parrish, R. N., & Weeks, G. D. (1972). Studies in interactive communication: The effects of four communication modes on the behavior of teams during a co-operative problem solving. Human Factors, 14, 487-509.
6. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
7. Daly-Jones, O., Monk, A., & Watts, L. (1998). Some advantages of video conferencing over high-quality audio conferencing: Fluency and awareness of attentional focus. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 49, 21-58.
8. Dourish, P., & Bly, S. (1992). Portholes: Supporting awareness in a distributed work group. Proceedings on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 541-547.
9. Durlach, N., & Slater, M. (2000). Presence in shared virtual environments and virtual togetherness. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(2), 214-217.
10. Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (1999). The effects of work-space awareness support on the usability of real-time distributed groupware. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 6(3), 243-281.
11. Heeter, C. (1992). Being there: The subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(2), 262-271.
12. Hendrix, C., & Barfield, W. (1996). The sense of presence within auditory virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 5(3), 290-301.
13. Katz, R., & Tushman, M. (1978). Communication patterns, project performance, and task characteristics: An empirical evaluation in an R&D setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 139-162.
14. Kraut, R. E., Fish, R. S., Root, R. W., & Chalfonte, B. L. (1990). Informal communication in organizations: Form, function, and technology. In S. Oskamp & S. Spacapan (Eds.), Human Reactions to Technology: The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology (pp. 145-199). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15. Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2).
16. Matsuura, N., Fujino, G., Okada, K., & Matsushita, Y. (1993). An approach to encounters and interaction in a virtual environment. Proceedings of ACM Computer Science Conference, Association for Computing Machinery, 298-303.
17. McLaughlin, M., Sukhatme, G. S., Peng, W., Zhu, W., & Parks, J. (2003). Performance and co-presence in heterogeneous haptic collaboration. Proceedings of the Eleventh Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, IEEE Virtual Reality (VR) 2003.
18. Mehrabian, A. (1969). Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 1(6), 205-207.
19. Ochsman, R. B., & Chapanis, A. (1974). The effects of 10 communication modes on the behavior of teams during co-operative problem-solving. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 6(5), 579-619.
20. Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M., & Meader, D. K. (1995). What mix of video and audio is useful for small groups doing remote real-time design work? Proceedings of the ACM CHI'95 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 362-368.
21. Rice, R. E. (1993). Media appropriateness: Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Human Communication Research, 19(4), 451- 484.
22. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.
23. Skinner, H., & Allen, B. (1983). Does the computer make a difference? Computerized versus face-to-face versus self-report assessment of alcohol, drug and tobacco use. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(2), 267-275.
24. Slater, M., & Steed, A. (2002). Meeting people virtually: Experiments in shared virtual environments. In R. Schroeder (Ed.), The social life of avatars: Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments (pp. 146-171). London: Springer-Verlag.
25. Slater, M., & Wilbur, S. (1997). A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(6), 603-616.
26. Vaske, J. J., & Grantham, C. E. (1989). Socializing the human-computer environment. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
27. Whittaker, S., & O-Conaill, B. (1997). The role of vision in face-to-face and mediated communication. In E. E. Finn, A. J. Sellen, & S. B. Wilbur, (Eds.), ViAeo-Mediated, Communication (pp. 23-50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Williams, E. (1977). Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 963-976.
29. Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3), 225-240.