Determining the effect of users' mobile phone on design preference via Interactive Genetic Algorithms

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1666-1670

  Nathan Roberts, Dan ^a   Kelly, Jarod C ^a   Liu, Yili ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ERGONOMICS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; ITERATIVE METHODS; SMARTPHONES;

DESIGN PREFERENCES; DESIGN SPACES; INTERACTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHM; RANDOM MUTATION; RESEARCH NEEDS; RESEARCH STUDIES; SCREEN SIZES; SEARCHING METHODS;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 81855211974     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/1071181311551347     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Bauerly, Michael, and Liu, Yili (2006). "Computational modeling and experimental investigation of effects of compositional elements on interface and design aesthetics," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 64, No. 8, pp. 670-682.
2. Bauerly, Michael, and Liu, Yili (2008). "Effects of symmetry and grouping on interface and design aesthetics." International Journal of Human Computer Interaction. 24(3), pp. 275-287.
3. Bauerly, Michael, and Liu, Yili (2009). Evaluation and improvement of interface aesthetics with an interactive genetic algorithm (IGA). International Journal of Human Computer Interaction. In press.
4. Cho, S. B. Towards creative evolutionary systems with interactive genetic algorithm. Applied Intelligence: The International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, Neural Networks, and Complex Problem-Solving Technologies, 16(2):129-38, 03/ 2002.
5. Chuang, M. C., Chang, C. C., & Hsu, S. H. (2001). Perceptual Factors Underlying User Preferences Toward Product Form of Mobile Phones. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 27, 247-258. (Pubitemid 32143776)
6. Darowish, M., Lawton, J. N., & Evans, P. J. (2009). What is cell phone elbow, and what should we tell our patients? Cleveland Clin. Jour. Med., 76 (5), 306-308.
7. Dawkins, R. The Blind Watchmaker. Harlow : Longman Scientific and Technical, 1986.
8. Durant, E. A. Wakefield, G. H. Van Tasell, D. J. and Rickert. M. E. Efficient perceptual tuning of hearing aids with genetic algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 12(2):144-155, 2004.
9. Green, P. E. and Srinivasan, V. Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. Journal of Marketing, 54(4):3-19, 1990.
10. Han, S. H., Kim, K. J., Yun, M. H., Hong, S. W., & Kim, J. (2004). Identifying Mobile Phone Design Features Critical to User Satisfaction. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 14, 15-29.
11. Holland, J. H. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial System. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 1975.
12. International Telecommunication Union. (2010). Measuring the Information Society. Geneva, Switzerland: ITU.
13. Jordan, P. W. Human factors for pleasure in product use. Applied Ergonomics, 29(1):25-33, 1998. (Pubitemid 27503887)
14. Kelly, J. C. Interactive genetic algorithms for shape preference assessment in engineering design. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 2008.
15. Kelly, J. C., Papalambros, P., & Wakefield, G. (2006). The Development of a Tool for the Preference Assessment of the Visual Aesthetics of an Object Using Interactive Genetic Algorithms. 9th Generative Art Conference. Milan, Italy.
16. Kelly, J.C., Wakefield, G.H., Papalambros, P.Y. "Evidence for using interactive genetic algorithms in shape preference assessment". International Journal of Product Development, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2011 pp 168-184.
17. Louviere, J. J. Hensher, D. A. and Swait, J. D. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
18. Liu, Yili (2003A). Engineering aesthetics and aesthetic ergonomics: Theoretical foundations and a dual-process research methodology. Ergonomics, 46, 1273-1292. (Pubitemid 37461128)
19. Liu, Yili (2003B). The Aesthetic and Ethic Dimensions of Human Factors Design. Ergonomics, 46, 1293-1305. (Pubitemid 37461129)
20. Nathan-Roberts, Dan, Beeker, Alex, Liu, Yili. (2009). Modeling Two Key Physical Ergonomic Problems with Mobile Phones. 2009 University of Michigan Engineering Graduate Symposium. November
21. Nathan-Roberts, Dan, & Liu, Yili (2010). Investigation of Relative Mobile Phone Size Preference Using Interactive Genetic Algorithms. 54th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. San Francisco, California: HFES.
22. Nathan-Roberts, Dan, Liu, Yili, Young, Michael, Hays, Jon D., So, Christine An, Little, Christian, and Zhao, Liang Hao. "Content Analysis of Literature on Mobile Phone Design Features." IEA, 17th World Congress on Ergonomics, Aug. 2009, Beijing, China
23. Noblet, J. (1993). Industrial Design: Reflections of a Century. Paris: Abbeville Press, Inc.
24. Otto, K. N. and Wood, K. L. Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development. Prentice Hall, 2001.
25. Seva, R. R., Duh, H., & Helander, M. G. (2006). Factors Affecting Emotional Responses in Mobile Phone Design Evaluation. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting, (pp. 2173-2177). San Francisco. (Pubitemid 351742097)