Investigation of relative mobile phone size preference using interactive genetic algorithms

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 3, Issue , 2010, Pages 1807-1811

  Nathan Roberts, Dan ^a   Liu, Yili ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ERGONOMICS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; ITERATIVE METHODS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SCREEN PRINTING;

DESIGN PREFERENCES; DISCRIMINABILITY; INTERACTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHM; MOBILE-PHONE DESIGNS; PHYSICAL FACTORS; PRINCIPAL-COMPONENT ANALYSIS; RESEARCH NEEDS; SCREEN SIZES;

CELLULAR TELEPHONES;

EID: 79953084343     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/154193121005402014     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Bauerly, M., & Liu, Y. (2009). Evaluation and Improvement of Interface Aesthetics with an Interactive Genetic Algorithm (IGA). international Journal of Human Computer Interaction , 25 (2), 155-166.
2. Chuang, M. C., Chang, C. C., & Hsu, S. H. (2001). Perceptual Factors Underlying User Preferences Toward Product Form of Mobile Phones. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics , 27, 247-258. (Pubitemid 32143776)
3. Darowish, M., Lawton, J. N., & Evans, P. J. (2009). What is cell phone elbow, and what should we tell our patients? Cleveland Clin. Jour. Med. , 76(5), 306-308.
4. Han, S. H., Kim, K. J., Yun, M. H., Hong, S. W., & Kim, J. (2004). Identifying Mobile Phone Design Features Critical to User Satisfaction. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing , 14, 15-29.
5. International Telecommunication Union. (2010). Measuring the Information Society. Geneva, Switzerland: ITU.
6. Kelly, J. C., Papalambros, P., & Wakefield, G. (2006). The Development of a Tool for the Preference Assessment of the Visual Aesthetics of an Object Using Interactive Genetic Algorithms. 9th Generative Art Conference. Milan, Italy.
7. Liu, Y. (2003). Engineering aesthetics and aesthetic ergonomics: Theoretical foundations and a dual-process research methodology. Ergonomics , 46, 1273-1292.
8. Nathan-Roberts, D., Beeker, A., & Liu, Y. (2009). Modeling Two Key Physical Ergonomic Problems with Mobile Phones. University of Michigan Engineering Graduate Symposium. Ann arbor.
9. Nathan-Roberts, D., Liu, Y., Young, M., Hays, J. D., An So, C., Little, C., et al. (2009). Content Analaysis of Literature on Mobile Phone Design Features. 17th World Congress on Ergonomics. Beijing, China: IEA.
10. Noblet, J. (1993). Industrial Design: Reflections of a Century. Paris: Abbeville Press, Inc.
11. Seva, R. R., Duh, H., & Helander, M. G. (2006). Factors Affecting Emotional Responses in Mobile Phone Design Evaulation. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 50th Annual Meeting, (pp. 2173-2177). San Francisco.